New studio update: Problems with managers and inactive studio owners.

DigitZeroGames

If the studio creator of a studio is inactive, then how can managers help the studio to grow? Also, how does becoming a manager benefit from being just a usual curator? In the update forum it says that people should choose their managers more carefully, but then it says that basically all permissions of managers have been minimised to a curator's level. It's a bit dodgy really, and I would truly appreciate efforts to improve this problem. Thanks for reading.

BarelySmooth

DigitZeroGames wrote:
then how can managers help the studio to grow?

The scratch team says the best option right now is to create a new studio

They are also discussing studio ownership transfer.

DigitZeroGames wrote:
Also, how does becoming a manager benefit from being just a usual curator?

Right now, managers can remove any projects and add/remove curators or managers.

DigitZeroGames wrote:
and I would truly appreciate efforts to improve this problem

The Scratch Team appreciates feedback and they continuously work on improving existing features

If you would like to know more about why these limits were put in place, see the FAQ.

Banner credit: @Prime689

(This text below is my forum signature)

Scratch Team never wrote:
Good suggestion. Let’s add that.

no offense to ST btw – Credit to @Fun_Cupcake_i81 for the above portion of the signature

Also, Nobody supports the support convention

404. That's an error.

The requested signature was not found under this post.
That's all we want you to know.

1Oaktree2

The Scratch Team is currently working on a solution for studio ownership - transferring.

Za-Chary

DigitZeroGames wrote:
If the studio creator of a studio is inactive, then how can managers help the studio to grow?

…Invite more curators? …Add more projects? I'm not really sure how changing the description to a studio would help it grow. That sounds like it would just be beneficial to those already in the studio.

DigitZeroGames wrote:
Also, how does becoming a manager benefit from being just a usual curator?

As mentioned above, managers can invite more curators, remove managers and curators, and remove projects that they did not add, in addition to adding projects. Curators can only add projects, and remove projects that they added.

Last edited by Za-Chary (July 16, 2021 10:48:11)

This is my forum signature! On a forum post, it is okay for Scratchers to advertise in their forum signature. The signature is the stuff that shows up below the horizontal line on the post. It will show up on every post I make.

I was a Scratch Team member from May 10th 2019 to October 29th 2021.

my notebook | scratch team essay | accessibility essay

Ridi0n

If a Manager is inactive on a studio and everyone that has any admin powers in it is Curator level, it's safe to say that studio is dead.

“R” Games - Studio
FNF Mod - Vs. Madness

(If scratch wasn't playing me up you would see an image here, however, you are most likely not.)
(And if the case of you not seeing an image does arise, have a cookie)

change [CookieAmount] by (1)

DigitZeroGames

BarelySmooth wrote:
DigitZeroGames wrote:
then how can managers help the studio to grow?
The scratch team says the best option right now is to create a new studio They are also discussing studio ownership transfer.

DigitZeroGames wrote:
Also, how does becoming a manager benefit from being just a usual curator?
Right now, managers can remove any projects and add/remove curators or managers.

DigitZeroGames wrote:
and I would truly appreciate efforts to improve this problem
The Scratch Team appreciates feedback and they continuously work on improving existing features

If you would like to know more about why these limits were put in place, see the FAQ.

Ok thanks for telling me about studio ownership transfer, sorry I didn't see the reply

Discuss Scratch