Due to the 3.0 update, “managers” cannot manage the studio anymore. What they can do is invite people. Please rename the “manager” role to “inviters” to more accurately reflect this.

Edit: This is slightly tongue-in-cheek, by the way.

yes, i agree. if they can't do anything then, please, let them assume their role as an inviter -_-

Agreed as the name is condraticting. Maybe the studio owner can just be called a “manager” and that is it.

dertermenter wrote:

Agreed as the name is condraticting. Maybe the studio owner can just be called a “manager” and that is it.

Support.

Yeah, I agree! Since they can't actually manage the studio anymore, it doesn't make sense

Agreed. That's the roles managers play, and we wouldn't want to confuse people with a misleading name.

DogCatPuppyLover wrote:

Due to the 3.0 update, “managers” cannot manage the studio anymore. What they can do is invite people. Please rename the “manager” role to “inviters” to more accurately reflect this.

PREACH

Support! The only thing that makes the current manager status different from the curator status, is the fact that they can invite people. It's misleading and implies that managers can actually manage something.

bump

No support. We don’t need to have more people rebelling because they aren’t called managers anymore. And no, they are not just inviters - they can add/remove projects, add/remove people, and edit the “anyone can add projects” checkbox.

They can do much more than invite people, this would just cause confusion.

han614698 wrote:

No support. We don’t need to have more people rebelling because they aren’t called managers anymore. And no, they are not just inviters - they can add/remove projects, add/remove people, and edit the “anyone can add projects” checkbox.

Then the name would be incorrect. The only non-curator permission they have now is that they can invite and remove people. it should be called Curator+ because that’s what it is

Also, curators can add and remove projects, and IMO the “anyone can add projects” feature is kinda useless because it just allows people to spam projects in the studio.

Support. It makes much more sense.

DogCatPuppyLover wrote:

Due to the 3.0 update, “managers” cannot manage the studio anymore. What they can do is invite people. Please rename the “manager” role to “inviters” to more accurately reflect this.

I completely agree with this!!! Its so annoying that managers cant do anything anymore, lets just reverse that update plz….

allxya_ wrote:

han614698 wrote:

No support. We don’t need to have more people rebelling because they aren’t called managers anymore. And no, they are not just inviters - they can add/remove projects, add/remove people, and edit the “anyone can add projects” checkbox.

Then the name would be incorrect. The only non-curator permission they have now is that they can invite and remove people. it should be called Curator+ because that’s what it is

Also, curators can add and remove projects, and IMO the “anyone can add projects” feature is kinda useless because it just allows people to spam projects in the studio.

Bro you're new so you don't understand, the “anyone can add projects” feature is a big helper making add-everything studios.

No support. The name “manager” is completely fine. It's not like you can't live without having the name changed.
And

ScolderCreations wrote:

They can do much more than invite people, this would just cause confusion.

han614698 wrote:

No support. We don’t need to have more people rebelling because they aren’t called managers anymore. And no, they are not just inviters - they can add/remove projects, add/remove people, and edit the “anyone can add projects” checkbox.

I agree.

SunnyBunny_Marvel wrote:

DogCatPuppyLover wrote:

Due to the 3.0 update, “managers” cannot manage the studio anymore. What they can do is invite people. Please rename the “manager” role to “inviters” to more accurately reflect this.

I completely agree with this!!! Its so annoying that managers cant do anything anymore, lets just reverse that update plz….

Did you just… Alr…

REVERSING THE STUDIO UPDATE IS REJECTED

also, please avoid necroposting, which is responding to an old dead post without adding anything new

You also don't have to quote OP…

Semi-support. This can get really confusing for me sometimes, and if I have to request something, I'd have to reach out to a manager, who can't edit the studio.
Sometimes it's completely hard and inconvenient when using this new feature, as when one person has to edit the studio, the owner has to make them the next owner, so only one person can edit at a time, which can be fairly annoying, especially when the owner is inactive.
However, scratch can probably go back to its chaotic era, editing after editing if this update is changed, and it can be harder to manage studios.
I'm not saying we should reverse the update, but we should at least make a bit of changes to make it more easier to edit studios and to remove confusion between the roles of Managers and Owners due to this 3.0 update.