Make the forum blocks 3.0

sathvikrias

madcoding1 wrote:
SUPPORT!!!
We need the Scratch team to look at this

please be constructive by saying why

lapisi

realItchCat wrote:
lapisi wrote:
the2000 wrote:
64lu wrote:
the2000 wrote:
lapisi wrote:
the2000 wrote:
Wrong opinion alert! Wrong opinion alert! Wrong opinion alert! /s
no such thing as a wrong opinion
that's why i wrote /s… it was a joke
did you really need to write it then
Apparently so, as they couldn't figure it out even with the “/s”
I actually have no idea what /s means.
/sarcasm. It's supposed to look like a forums tag.

but there's already an s being used as a forums tag, and it does this

mybearworld

I think it means /s, as in “Okay, that was fun, now let's stop with the wrong thing”

madcoding1

sathvikrias wrote:
madcoding1 wrote:
SUPPORT!!!
We need the Scratch team to look at this
please be constructive by saying why

Ah, Well you see, some block do not appear as they do in 3.0.
Such as

when green flag clicked

Is a too dark shade of brown

define

Is purple when it should be pink

(list :: list)

Is red when it should be orange

They might also want to add the extra blocks, like Lego Mindstorms, or Amazon Translate

Last edited by madcoding1 (March 18, 2021 20:24:14)

sathvikrias

madcoding1 wrote:
Amazon Translate

*Google translate

the2000

mybearworld wrote:
I think it means /s, as in “Okay, that was fun, now let's stop with the wrong thing”

Ah yes, the phrase everyone thinks of when they hear the letter s

/s, It means sarcasm

han614698

Bump

dhuls

Support. I have some ideas
1. All posts made after January 1, 2019 will have all of their Scratchblocks tags converted to 3.0
2. It should work similarly to how it does on the wiki

[scratchblocks=1.4]when green flag clicked // this will result in a Scratch 1.4 block[/scratchblocks]
[scratchblocks=2.0]when green flag clicked // this will result in a Scratch 2.0 block[/scratchblocks]
[scratchblocks=3.0]when green flag clicked // this will result in a Scratch 3.0 block[/scratchblocks]
[scratchblocks]when green flag clicked // this will also result in a Scratch 3.0 block[/scratchblocks]

3. Yes, I do know that on the wiki it is

<scratchblocks version=3.0>

but the previous method is more consistent with the rest of BBCode.

badilreal

NilsTheBest wrote:
Scratchblocks were updated on the wiki recently, so it should be updated on the forums soon, I guess. Be patient

annnnnddddddddddd it never happened

64lu

badilreal wrote:
NilsTheBest wrote:
Scratchblocks were updated on the wiki recently, so it should be updated on the forums soon, I guess. Be patient
annnnnddddddddddd it never happened

soon is later

PGBFLITE6373

cSupport has this might confuse new scratchers why the the blocks look weird

dhuls

bump

TheCloudDev

bump

ScratchCat1038

Support! The 3.0 design is a lot more modern. Also, we have to type in more stuff for the new 3.0 blocks. For example, the BB-Code to make a () contains () block is this:

() contains () :: operators

which turns into this:

() contains () :: operators

However, new scratchers might use this instead:

() contains ()

which turns into this:

() contains ()

That's the list block, which is incorrect. When the 3.0 design is added,

() contains ()

will turn into

() contains () :: operators

and

[ v] contains ()

will turn into

[ v] contains ()

which is correct.

Unithlees3

Support! 2.0 is ugly tbh

k7e

The main reason I support is because there are new 3.0 blocks.

ScratchCat1038

k7e wrote:
The main reason I support is because there are new 3.0 blocks.

Same. I made a post above about it, explaining how trying to use the 3.0 blocks doesn't work/turns it into a different block.
400th post on this topic

Last edited by ScratchCat1038 (June 21, 2021 17:57:03)

dhuls

Bump
King of the Page no edit.

PenguinLover1123

OMEGA SUPPORT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! because 2.0 is ugly

define 2.0 uglyness spray  
//ugly

Codingfairy07

PenguinLover1123 wrote:
OMEGA SUPPORT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! because 2.0 is ugly
define 2.0 uglyness spray  
//ugly

I wouldn't call 2.0 Ugly, but it is just a different design. As a 2.0 lover and a scratcher who wishes that she could have been on Scratch during 2.0, you are (sort of) offending me. Also, please be constructive. Please explain why you think 2.0 is ugly.

Last edited by Codingfairy07 (July 13, 2021 15:29:44)

Discuss Scratch