Discuss Scratch
- Discussion Forums
- » Suggestions
- » "Run, and run" E block (READ THE ENTIRE OP BEFORE POSTING)
- Maximouse
- Scratcher
1000+ posts
"Run, and run" E block (READ THE ENTIRE OP BEFORE POSTING)
Why did you change the block name to “run {} and {}”? It isn't possible to tell that the inputs run at the same time now.
- gosoccerboy5
- Scratcher
1000+ posts
"Run, and run" E block (READ THE ENTIRE OP BEFORE POSTING)
I agree, “run while running” would be a bit more descriptive Why did you change the block name to “run {} and {}”? It isn't possible to tell that the inputs run at the same time now.
- xXRedTheCoderXx
- Scratcher
1000+ posts
"Run, and run" E block (READ THE ENTIRE OP BEFORE POSTING)
Because Why did you change the block name to “run {} and {}”? It isn't possible to tell that the inputs run at the same time now.
I think less is more when it comes to blocks. PerhapsCan't disagree there. The name used to be, “Run, while running,” as in, it runs code while running other code, but it was changed due to people thinking some people might be confused as new coders might not understand what run in this context means. I don't like the name of the block. I like the idea of being able to run two scripts at once* in an E block, but “do while doing” is such a clunky and inelegant name, especially with the verb “do”. I personally can't think of a better name, but it just feels gross to say and read.
I honestly think I should get the old name back, what do you think?run {could work, though it'd be weird to refer to this block's name.
} and {
} ::control
But yeah, I didn't think of that. Should we just go back to the OG name now?
- GreenMonke
- Scratcher
9 posts
"Run, and run" E block (READ THE ENTIRE OP BEFORE POSTING)
(long unnecessary quote removed by moderator - please don't spam)
Support! I think that would be usefull!
Support! I think that would be usefull!
Last edited by Paddle2See (Dec. 18, 2020 16:11:51)
Have a great day and a great life! And don't forget to wear a life jacket!
- portalpower
- Scratcher
1000+ posts
"Run, and run" E block (READ THE ENTIRE OP BEFORE POSTING)
please don't quote the OP when it's long, it's basically spam
thank you for reading my post and have a nice day!
shift+down to view my signature
idk what to put here.
- Maximouse
- Scratcher
1000+ posts
"Run, and run" E block (READ THE ENTIRE OP BEFORE POSTING)
Maybe. Should we just go back to the OG name now?
- lovecodeabc
- Scratcher
1000+ posts
"Run, and run" E block (READ THE ENTIRE OP BEFORE POSTING)
I think a better name would be
Run {} while running at the same time {}
Run {} while running at the same time {}
Last edited by lovecodeabc (Dec. 18, 2020 20:39:25)
Highlight + Ctrl + Shift + down to see full sig
Check out my thingymagings!
Click on them to go to them
Click on them to go to them
© 2019 - 2023 lovecodeabc. All Rights Reserved under Title 17 of the United States Code, and especialy under Section 101-513. Unauthorized Use Prohibited, except under 17 USC § 107, Fair Use. cease and desist letters go brrrrrrr
Uh oh, did the kumquats come again?
Click here!!!OR ELSE I WILL EAT YOUR COOKIESSSSSSSSSSSSSS AND ALSO MAYBE YOUR MOM, WHO KNOWS??
;
- Maximouse
- Scratcher
1000+ posts
"Run, and run" E block (READ THE ENTIRE OP BEFORE POSTING)
I think that would be too long. I think a better name would be
Run {} while running at the same time {}
- NanoPIex
- Scratcher
500+ posts
"Run, and run" E block (READ THE ENTIRE OP BEFORE POSTING)
Support! This would be useful and the workaround is infinite blocks depending on how big of a script.
L
- MeIzAwezomeDede
- Scratcher
1000+ posts
"Run, and run" E block (READ THE ENTIRE OP BEFORE POSTING)
NO SUPPORT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! JUST DO 2 SEPERATE SCRIPTS!
Can`t you make to seperate scripts? (no support)
Support! This would be useful!
Support! This would be useful and the workaround is infinite blocks depending on how big of a script.no offense but you've said “no support” and “support” four separate times without checking to see if you've already responded or not
Remember to check for this before you post, as it can get quite spammy
Nothing to see here
- portalpower
- Scratcher
1000+ posts
"Run, and run" E block (READ THE ENTIRE OP BEFORE POSTING)
it's not possible to make a workaround for this Support! This would be useful and the workaround is infinite blocks depending on how big of a script.
thank you for reading my post and have a nice day!
shift+down to view my signature
idk what to put here.
- NanoPIex
- Scratcher
500+ posts
"Run, and run" E block (READ THE ENTIRE OP BEFORE POSTING)
Okay.NO SUPPORT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! JUST DO 2 SEPERATE SCRIPTS!Can`t you make to seperate scripts? (no support)Support! This would be useful!Support! This would be useful and the workaround is infinite blocks depending on how big of a script.no offense but you've said “no support” and “support” four separate times without checking to see if you've already responded or not
Remember to check for this before you post, as it can get quite spammy
L
- gosoccerboy5
- Scratcher
1000+ posts
"Run, and run" E block (READ THE ENTIRE OP BEFORE POSTING)
bump..
- gosoccerboy5
- Scratcher
1000+ posts
"Run, and run" E block (READ THE ENTIRE OP BEFORE POSTING)
That's me all the time Have you had those times you were going to comment on a topic about your opinion or some kind of solution?
But instead it's been brought through a roller coaster and instead you just leave it alone.
Yeah say hello to me.
- IndianRuby718
- Scratcher
100+ posts
"Run, and run" E block (READ THE ENTIRE OP BEFORE POSTING)
Oookay. so. I hadn't been on Scratch for a week, and when I saw the title got changed (nooooo whyyyy) I have been avoiding this for another week.. so time to get this sorted out once and for all…
So first of all, before anybody said anything about “run, while running” I was actually planning on saying that I don't really like the sound of “do, while doing” and that I would give a bit more support if the block was called “run, while running” I don't have any proof, but it's true.. :P
I think the second thing would've saved a lot of conversation if I had posted this earlier– Making it work like else-if:
If only I had said this earlier.. [and support btw XD]
Post 300!!
So first of all, before anybody said anything about “run, while running” I was actually planning on saying that I don't really like the sound of “do, while doing” and that I would give a bit more support if the block was called “run, while running” I don't have any proof, but it's true.. :P
I think the second thing would've saved a lot of conversation if I had posted this earlier– Making it work like else-if:
run {And there would either be buttons or options when right-clicked to add or remove more parts (block designer's choice :P) And it solves the problem of sounding right both when stacking them (because you won't need to directly stack them) and when referring to it too.
} while running {
} while running {
} :: control
If only I had said this earlier.. [and support btw XD]
Post 300!!
So… I didn't update my signature for over a year XP But… I left the forums, and I'm not coming back anytime soon
(and I'm not updating my signature)
Both stickied Suggestions Directories currently have 138 replies.
Only fdreerf can break the equilibrium.
________________
Only fdreerf can break the equilibrium.
________________
I get more frustrated with people telling me about “mass reporting” than I do about “mass reporting” itself.source
good luck digging up the original reply in the comments
ctrl+f exists
https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/post/6961734/
Bug with the color effect I would really like to see fixed
EEEEEEE DDDDDD IIIIIIII TTTTTTTT NNN NN OOOOO
EE DD DD II TT :: NNNN NN OO OO
EEEEEEE DD DD II TT NN NN NN OO OO
EE DD DD II TT :: NN NN NN OO OO
EE DD DD II TT NN NNNN OO OO
EEEEEEE DDDDDD IIIIIIII TT NN NNN OOOOO
Hand-done.
< :: extension>
< :: custom-arg>
< :: motion>
Don't click this link…
- GunChleoc
- Scratcher
500+ posts
"Run, and run" E block (READ THE ENTIRE OP BEFORE POSTING)
I'd prefer being able to pass variables to broadcast blocks.
- StiwenIsHandsome
- Scratcher
51 posts
"Run, and run" E block (READ THE ENTIRE OP BEFORE POSTING)
support!
also wouldnt the project lag really hard?
also wouldnt the project lag really hard?
- xXRedTheCoderXx
- Scratcher
1000+ posts
"Run, and run" E block (READ THE ENTIRE OP BEFORE POSTING)
No, it wouldn't. support!
also wouldnt the project lag really hard?
- portalpower
- Scratcher
1000+ posts
"Run, and run" E block (READ THE ENTIRE OP BEFORE POSTING)
only if you put the blocks that make run without screen refresh functions lag support!
also wouldnt the project lag really hard?
ex:
foreveralso just know a block like this got removed, read this
end
wait until <>
thank you for reading my post and have a nice day!
shift+down to view my signature
idk what to put here.
- Discussion Forums
- » Suggestions
- » "Run, and run" E block (READ THE ENTIRE OP BEFORE POSTING)