BaconAndEggs1School wrote:

bro i was in math class but i wasnt doing math i was really playing scrathc LIEK a B0SS XD but then my teacher mr yanni caught me and said no more scratch during math time i was soooo madd uhrn so then i hit him on the head withmy laptop and i was like “HOWS THIS FOR MAth!!” and then i got in big trouble because mr yanni died now i dont even go to school anymore just juvenile detention!!! aw yeah its paper minceaft tiem all the time baby! good bye school!

funnycoder22 wrote:

Math + Brain = 0 brain cell!!!

CatsUnited wrote:

I smell some ban evasion in the air

PecanPi314 wrote:

so i was doing math and i see this thread and im like!! wtfrick!! (what the fr*ick!!) this is so dumb!! math is totally epic and you guys are going to clean up trash as your job wheen u r older >))

CatsUnited wrote:

PecanPi314 wrote:

so i was doing math and i see this thread and im like!! wtfrick!! (what the fr*ick!!) this is so dumb!! math is totally epic and you guys are going to clean up trash as your job wheen u r older >))

or be youtubers, same thing

dreamlandsonic wrote:

Math is even worse when you have Dyscalculia…

• a set (collection) called S
  
• a binary operation on S (meaning, it takes two elements of S and produces an element of S) called +
  
• an element of S called e
  
• an unary operation on S (meaning, it takes an element of S and produces an element of S) called -
  

• for all a, b, c in S, a + (b + c) = (a + b) + c (associativity)
  
• for all x in S, x + e = x and e + x = x (identity)
  
• for all x in S, x + (-x) = e (inverse)
  

• e + (-e) = e (inverse, where x = e)
  
• e + (-e) = -e (identity, where x = -e)
  
• -e = e (transitivity of equality)
  

TheAspiringHacker wrote:

dreamlandsonic wrote:

Math is even worse when you have Dyscalculia…

How does dyscalculia affect the understanding of more abstract mathematical ideas, which don't involve numbers?

For example, if I told you,

There is something called a “group” that consists of:

• a set S
  
• a binary operation on S called +
  
• an element of S called e
  
• an unary operation on S called -
  

such that

• for all a, b, c in S, a + (b + c) = (a + b) + c (associativity)
  
• for all x in S, x + e = x and e + x = x (identity)
  
• for all x in S, x + (-x) = e (inverse)
  

(and the elements of S are not numbers, you shouldn't think about how much they are “worth;” you can only look at the above rules)

then showed you this proof:

Lemma: The identity element e is its own inverse
Proof:

• e + (-e) = e (inverse, where x = e)
  
• e + (-e) = -e (identity, where x = -e)
  
• -e = e (transitivity of equality)
  

can you understand what's going on?

2Dproductions wrote:

TheAspiringHacker wrote:

dreamlandsonic wrote:

Math is even worse when you have Dyscalculia…

How does dyscalculia affect the understanding of more abstract mathematical ideas, which don't involve numbers?

For example, if I told you,

There is something called a “group” that consists of:

• a set S
  
• a binary operation on S called +
  
• an element of S called e
  
• an unary operation on S called -
  

such that

• for all a, b, c in S, a + (b + c) = (a + b) + c (associativity)
  
• for all x in S, x + e = x and e + x = x (identity)
  
• for all x in S, x + (-x) = e (inverse)
  

(and the elements of S are not numbers, you shouldn't think about how much they are “worth;” you can only look at the above rules)

then showed you this proof:

Lemma: The identity element e is its own inverse
Proof:

• e + (-e) = e (inverse, where x = e)
  
• e + (-e) = -e (identity, where x = -e)
  
• -e = e (transitivity of equality)
  

can you understand what's going on?

no. because math has been outlawed in my country so we don't learn it.

TheAspiringHacker wrote:

2Dproductions wrote:

TheAspiringHacker wrote:

dreamlandsonic wrote:

Math is even worse when you have Dyscalculia…

How does dyscalculia affect the understanding of more abstract mathematical ideas, which don't involve numbers?

For example, if I told you,

There is something called a “group” that consists of:

• a set S
  
• a binary operation on S called +
  
• an element of S called e
  
• an unary operation on S called -
  

such that

• for all a, b, c in S, a + (b + c) = (a + b) + c (associativity)
  
• for all x in S, x + e = x and e + x = x (identity)
  
• for all x in S, x + (-x) = e (inverse)
  

(and the elements of S are not numbers, you shouldn't think about how much they are “worth;” you can only look at the above rules)

then showed you this proof:

Lemma: The identity element e is its own inverse
Proof:

• e + (-e) = e (inverse, where x = e)
  
• e + (-e) = -e (identity, where x = -e)
  
• -e = e (transitivity of equality)
  

can you understand what's going on?

no. because math has been outlawed in my country so we don't learn it.

Shush, I'm asking a serious question…

CatsUnited wrote:

PecanPi314 wrote:

so i was doing math and i see this thread and im like!! wtfrick!! (what the fr*ick!!) this is so dumb!! math is totally epic and you guys are going to clean up trash as your job wheen u r older >))

or be youtubers, same thing

adobe-brick wrote:

CatsUnited wrote:

PecanPi314 wrote:

so i was doing math and i see this thread and im like!! wtfrick!! (what the fr*ick!!) this is so dumb!! math is totally epic and you guys are going to clean up trash as your job wheen u r older >))

or be youtubers, same thing

If there was a like button on the scratch forums i would click it on this post.