Hey There Fellow Aters, I saw a rly old thread about what coding ediror you use, so i thought to make a new one, and so scratchers can share their editors!

I Use Carret (Chromebook), And Atom,Brackets, And Visul Code Studio (desktop)

A screenshot of your editor is asked if possible.

Notepad++ | https://capitalists.are-bad.ga/9aVbxOec.png
Code::Blocks | https://you.are-bad.ga/Drn7e1uB.png
nano | https://cookies.are-bad.ga/wcuYQG7e.png

i normally use Sublime Text 3

http://u.cubeupload.com/__init__/20180630142602.png

xn--cr8h wrote:

i normally use Sublime Text 3

http://u.cubeupload.com/__init__/20180630142602.png

I use the same code editor as you do, except that it looks different.

bybb wrote:

Notepad++ | https://capitalists.are-bad.ga/9aVbxOec.png
Code::Blocks | https://you.are-bad.ga/Drn7e1uB.png
nano | https://cookies.are-bad.ga/wcuYQG7e.png

I Use Notepad++. Vs, Brackets, Atom, and Caret (Chromebook)

>visual studio code
>atom
>brackets

Those are web browsers. This thread is asking what text editor you use, not web browser.

$(".box-head")[0].textContent = "committing AT crimes since $whenever"

MegaApuTurkUltra wrote:

>visual studio code
>atom
>brackets

Those are web browsers. This thread is asking what text editor you use, not web browser.

Lol. Serousily. I memant web brrowsers and text lol.

Most Stuff: Notepad++ or Visual Studio Code
C++, C, C#, Visual Basic: Visual Studio Community 2017
Java: IntelliJ IDEA Community (sometimes Eclipse)
Python: Python IDLE (sometimes PyCharm)
While using Windows Subsystem for Linux: nano

MegaApuTurkUltra wrote:

>visual studio code
>atom
>brackets

Those are web browsers. This thread is asking what text editor you use, not web browser.

Quite sure you can have a text editor in a web browser?

Unless this clique has a highly irregular definition of a “text editor,” I'm quite sure a text editor is anything that edits text, including textareas on websites and writing on paper.

MegaApuTurkUltra wrote:

>visual studio code
>atom
>brackets

Those are web browsers. This thread is asking what text editor you use, not web browser.

I see what you did there.

To help anyone confused by MATU's statement, the editors MATU listed are all powered by Electron. Electron is an engine (I think that is the correct word) for creating apps, powered by the same program that is used in Google Chrome. Some people (Including myself at times) believe that this leads to a very bloated editing experience.

iwotastic wrote:

MegaApuTurkUltra wrote:

>visual studio code
>atom
>brackets

Those are web browsers. This thread is asking what text editor you use, not web browser.

I see what you did there.

To help anyone confused by MATU's statement, the editors MATU listed are all powered by Electron. Electron is an engine (I think that is the correct word) for creating apps, powered by the same program that is used in Google Chrome. Some people (Including myself at times) believe that this leads to a very bloated editing experience.

To explain the joke to everyone basically, Electron is a system for turning web pages into apps.

iwotastic wrote:

To help anyone confused by MATU's statement, the editors MATU listed are all powered by Electron.

actually, brackets uses its own fork of the chromium rendering engine i think

OK, vim or emacs?

Edit: I've tried both, but prefer vim.

When I log into my Xenix system with my 110 baud teletype, both vi and Emacs are just too * slow. They print useless messages like, ‘C-h for help’ and ‘“foo” File is read only’. So I use the editor that doesn't waste my VALUABLE time.

Ed, man! !man ed

ED(1) Unix Programmer's Manual ED(1)

NAME
ed - text editor

SYNOPSIS
ed
DESCRIPTION
Ed is the standard text editor.
—

Computer Scientists love ed, not just because it comes first alphabetically, but because it's the standard. Everyone else loves ed because it's ED!

“Ed is the standard text editor.”

And ed doesn't waste space on my Timex Sinclair. Just look:

-rwxr-xr-x 1 root 24 Oct 29 1929 /bin/ed
-rwxr-xr-t 4 root 1310720 Jan 1 1970 /usr/ucb/vi
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root 5.89824e37 Oct 22 1990 /usr/bin/emacs
Of course, on the system I administrate, vi is symlinked to ed. Emacs has been replaced by a shell script which 1) Generates a syslog message at level LOG_EMERG; 2) reduces the user's disk quota by 100K; and 3) RUNS ED!!!!!!

“Ed is the standard text editor.”

Let's look at a typical novice's session with the mighty ed:

golem$ ed

?
help
?
?
?
quit
?
exit
?
bye
?
hello?
?
eat flaming death
?
^C
?
^C
?
^D
?
—

Note the consistent user interface and error reportage. Ed is generous enough to flag errors, yet prudent enough not to overwhelm the novice with verbosity.

“Ed is the standard text editor.”

Ed, the greatest WYGIWYG editor of all.

ED IS THE TRUE PATH TO NIRVANA! ED HAS BEEN THE CHOICE OF EDUCATED AND IGNORANT ALIKE FOR CENTURIES! ED WILL NOT CORRUPT YOUR PRECIOUS BODILY FLUIDS!! ED IS THE STANDARD TEXT EDITOR! ED MAKES THE SUN SHINE AND THE BIRDS SING AND THE GRASS GREEN!!

When I use an editor, I don't want eight extra KILOBYTES of worthless help screens and cursor positioning code! I just want an EDitor!! Not a “viitor”. Not a “emacsitor”. Those aren't even WORDS!!!! ED! ED! ED IS THE STANDARD!!!

TEXT EDITOR.

When IBM, in its ever-present omnipotence, needed to base their “edlin” on a Unix standard, did they mimic vi? No. Emacs? Surely you jest. They chose the most karmic editor of all. The standard.

Ed is for those who can remember what they are working on. If you are an idiot, you should use Emacs. If you are an Emacs, you should not be vi. If you use ED, you are on THE PATH TO REDEMPTION. THE SO-CALLED “VISUAL” EDITORS HAVE BEEN PLACED HERE BY ED TO TEMPT THE FAITHLESS. DO NOT GIVE IN!!! THE MIGHTY ED HAS SPOKEN!!!

?

badatprogrammingibe wrote:

snip

Why do you want to use a text editor on a Sinclair ZX Spectrum? That is inefficient! You should use a Apple II without a monitor instead, or at least a ZX80.

Notepad is the standard text editor.

badatprogrammingibe wrote:

-snip-

Because of you, I'm going to unironically use ed.

MegaApuTurkUltra wrote:

bybb wrote:

OK, vim or emacs?

Edit: I've tried both, but prefer vim.

MegaApuTurkUltra wrote:

the best editor

emacs scrubs need not apply :P

I can read it