Urge your local lawmakers to Restore Net Neutrality!

KidoftheEnder45

Generic_Joke2 wrote:
who cares about this “Net Neutrality” thing anymore

Its gone
Who cares
Pretty sure the original creator of this tread and many people who supported it forgot it

Thank you

Nemofish84

Greenduck54 wrote:
jromagnoli wrote:
Greenduck54 wrote:
jromagnoli wrote:
Greenduck54 wrote:
Nemofish84 wrote:
KidoftheEnder45 wrote:
braxbroscratcher wrote:
Greenduck54 wrote:
And no rules for ISPs to follow on the internet doesn't?
they do have rules. they're called southern kids with shovels.
What?
I agree. Southern kids with shovels doesn't seem like a rule.
Definitely not a rule.
Not having net neutrality would not mean no rules.
Yes it does. Net Neutrality are their rules.
There are plenty of other laws regarding the internet. It's not the wild west.
None of them are strong protections for consumers from abusive ISPs.
No Net Neutrality is
jromagnoli wrote:
effective anarchy
because without it the biggest protection for consumers is gone.

Does the internet have laws?

Generic_Joke2 wrote:
who cares about this “Net Neutrality” thing anymore

Its gone
Who cares
Pretty sure the original creator of this tread and many people who supported it forgot it

I quite disagree.
Net Neutrality may be big in July, or who knows what.

Last edited by Nemofish84 (April 17, 2018 14:23:42)

jromagnoli

Nemofish84 wrote:
Greenduck54 wrote:
jromagnoli wrote:
Greenduck54 wrote:
jromagnoli wrote:
Greenduck54 wrote:
Nemofish84 wrote:
KidoftheEnder45 wrote:
braxbroscratcher wrote:
Greenduck54 wrote:
And no rules for ISPs to follow on the internet doesn't?
they do have rules. they're called southern kids with shovels.
What?
I agree. Southern kids with shovels doesn't seem like a rule.
Definitely not a rule.
Not having net neutrality would not mean no rules.
Yes it does. Net Neutrality are their rules.
There are plenty of other laws regarding the internet. It's not the wild west.
None of them are strong protections for consumers from abusive ISPs.
No Net Neutrality is
jromagnoli wrote:
effective anarchy
because without it the biggest protection for consumers is gone.
Does the internet have laws?
Generic_Joke2 wrote:
who cares about this “Net Neutrality” thing anymore

Its gone
Who cares
Pretty sure the original creator of this tread and many people who supported it forgot it
I quite disagree.
Net Neutrality may be big in July, or who knows what.

There a many laws regarding the use of information and privacy online. If the US govt stopped regulating where certain ISPS could operate, there would be no drawbacks to repealing net neutrality.

MasterOfTheTiger

Jromagnoli, what makes you against net neutrality? What is wrong with it? I think that it is positive for the internet. I don't like the idea of ISPs being able to control my internet.

braxbroscratcher

MasterOfTheTiger wrote:
Jromagnoli, what makes you against net neutrality? What is wrong with it? I think that it is positive for the internet. I don't like the idea of ISPs being able to control my internet.

They still can't. There are numerous other regulations that stand intact. Also, the removal of NN could be good as the ISP can actually throttle things that are potentially harmful.

mr-scratch-cat

MasterOfTheTiger wrote:
Jromagnoli, what makes you against net neutrality? What is wrong with it? I think that it is positive for the internet. I don't like the idea of ISPs being able to control my internet.

Either something about protection from malware or just conservative politics

Generic_Joke2

the emoji movie 2

Nemofish84

Generic_Joke2 wrote:
the emoji movie 2

…probably has to do absolutely nothing with this topic.

braxbroscratcher

mr-scratch-cat wrote:
MasterOfTheTiger wrote:
Jromagnoli, what makes you against net neutrality? What is wrong with it? I think that it is positive for the internet. I don't like the idea of ISPs being able to control my internet.
Either something about protection from malware or just conservative politics

progressives aren't really progressives though, so…

I mean, all their socialist policies don't further what's a tried and true recipe for rapid progress - capitalism.

proffessor4

jromagnoli wrote:
Greenduck54 wrote:
jromagnoli wrote:
Greenduck54 wrote:
Nemofish84 wrote:
KidoftheEnder45 wrote:
braxbroscratcher wrote:
Greenduck54 wrote:
And no rules for ISPs to follow on the internet doesn't?
they do have rules. they're called southern kids with shovels.
What?
I agree. Southern kids with shovels doesn't seem like a rule.
Definitely not a rule.
Not having net neutrality would not mean no rules.
Yes it does. Net Neutrality are their rules.
There are plenty of other laws regarding the internet. It's not the wild west.

it is the western hemisphere… and a lot of southern kids with shovels.

Generic_Joke2

Can you all stop talking about NN
So What
Its not like the internet is all over
Stop making a big deal and get over with it
They won and we didn't

proffessor4

jromagnoli wrote:
Nemofish84 wrote:
Greenduck54 wrote:
jromagnoli wrote:
Greenduck54 wrote:
jromagnoli wrote:
Greenduck54 wrote:
Nemofish84 wrote:
KidoftheEnder45 wrote:
braxbroscratcher wrote:
Greenduck54 wrote:
And no rules for ISPs to follow on the internet doesn't?
they do have rules. they're called southern kids with shovels.
What?
I agree. Southern kids with shovels doesn't seem like a rule.
Definitely not a rule.
Not having net neutrality would not mean no rules.
Yes it does. Net Neutrality are their rules.
There are plenty of other laws regarding the internet. It's not the wild west.
None of them are strong protections for consumers from abusive ISPs.
No Net Neutrality is
jromagnoli wrote:
effective anarchy
because without it the biggest protection for consumers is gone.
Does the internet have laws?
Generic_Joke2 wrote:
who cares about this “Net Neutrality” thing anymore

Its gone
Who cares
Pretty sure the original creator of this tread and many people who supported it forgot it
I quite disagree.
Net Neutrality may be big in July, or who knows what.
There a many laws regarding the use of information and privacy online. If the US govt stopped regulating where certain ISPS could operate, there would be no drawbacks to repealing net neutrality.

it would cause a LOT of drawbacks, ISP's would LOVE to rack in as much money as possible, if net neutrality gets repealed ISP's will have the freedom to charge small business's, bloggers, organizations (profit AND nonprofit), big companies, etc. for no reason. and where do those being charged get their money from? US!

proffessor4

Generic_Joke2 wrote:
Can you all stop talking about NN
So What
Its not like the internet is all over
Stop making a big deal and get over with it
They won and we didn't

actually, the senate has NOT voted yet. nobody's being effected yet because net neutrality hasn't been repealed yet.

KidoftheEnder45

proffessor4 wrote:
jromagnoli wrote:
Greenduck54 wrote:
jromagnoli wrote:
Greenduck54 wrote:
Nemofish84 wrote:
KidoftheEnder45 wrote:
braxbroscratcher wrote:
Greenduck54 wrote:
And no rules for ISPs to follow on the internet doesn't?
they do have rules. they're called southern kids with shovels.
What?
I agree. Southern kids with shovels doesn't seem like a rule.
Definitely not a rule.
Not having net neutrality would not mean no rules.
Yes it does. Net Neutrality are their rules.
There are plenty of other laws regarding the internet. It's not the wild west.
it is the western hemisphere… and a lot of southern kids with shovels.

Hol' up, lemme get mah shovel real quick-

KidoftheEnder45

Here, stop bringing it up lol

Generic_Joke2

In to the rice fields

KidoftheEnder45

Generic_Joke2 wrote:
In to the rice fields

INTO THE TOBACCER FIELDS AH GO

proffessor4

Generic_Joke2 wrote:
who cares about this “Net Neutrality” thing anymore

Its gone
Who cares
Pretty sure the original creator of this tread and many people who supported it forgot it

no, the thread isn't completely gone yet, and net neutrality still matters.
pretend net neutrality is an orange and the senate is a person holding it over the edge of a skyscraper.
at the election, senate could either drop the orange, in which the orange would fall for some time then SPLAT its irreparable.
or senate could keep holding on, and save that marvelous orange.
ISP's could be stuck in the elevator while we try to stop the repairman (ajit pai) from letting them up to grab the orange and throw it
(i know it's an awful simile)

proffessor4

KidoftheEnder45 wrote:
Generic_Joke2 wrote:
In to the rice fields
INTO THE TOBACCER FIELDS AH GO

what do you mean?

KidoftheEnder45

proffessor4 wrote:
KidoftheEnder45 wrote:
Generic_Joke2 wrote:
In to the rice fields
INTO THE TOBACCER FIELDS AH GO
what do you mean?

Shovel

Discuss Scratch