SuperDoom wrote:

TealWashableMarker wrote:

SuperDoom wrote:

PonyoPenguin wrote:

I don't see why splitting the discussion was necessary. My initial suggestion was to have a general age ratings discussion thread.

This was solely for ESRB and Sega's old VGA. Nothing else.



NOTHING CAN CHANGE MY MIND.
If you look closely at the PEGI thread, Computerfan is the only person to post there who would actually use PEGI.

But why does it need to be?

Because it does.

TealWashableMarker wrote:

SuperDoom wrote:

TealWashableMarker wrote:

SuperDoom wrote:

PonyoPenguin wrote:

I don't see why splitting the discussion was necessary. My initial suggestion was to have a general age ratings discussion thread.

This was solely for ESRB and Sega's old VGA. Nothing else.



NOTHING CAN CHANGE MY MIND.
If you look closely at the PEGI thread, Computerfan is the only person to post there who would actually use PEGI.

But why does it need to be?

Because it does.

But that's stupid.

jromagnoli wrote:

TealWashableMarker wrote:

SuperDoom wrote:

TealWashableMarker wrote:

SuperDoom wrote:

PonyoPenguin wrote:

I don't see why splitting the discussion was necessary. My initial suggestion was to have a general age ratings discussion thread.

This was solely for ESRB and Sega's old VGA. Nothing else.



NOTHING CAN CHANGE MY MIND.
If you look closely at the PEGI thread, Computerfan is the only person to post there who would actually use PEGI.

But why does it need to be?

Because it does.

But that's stupid.

But it is his thread and pegi is different than ESRB.

SuperDoom wrote:

jromagnoli wrote:

TealWashableMarker wrote:

SuperDoom wrote:

TealWashableMarker wrote:

SuperDoom wrote:

PonyoPenguin wrote:

I don't see why splitting the discussion was necessary. My initial suggestion was to have a general age ratings discussion thread.

This was solely for ESRB and Sega's old VGA. Nothing else.



NOTHING CAN CHANGE MY MIND.
If you look closely at the PEGI thread, Computerfan is the only person to post there who would actually use PEGI.

But why does it need to be?

Because it does.

But that's stupid.

But it is his thread and pegi is different than ESRB.

This.

Nyambii wrote:

SuperDoom wrote:

jromagnoli wrote:

TealWashableMarker wrote:

SuperDoom wrote:

TealWashableMarker wrote:

SuperDoom wrote:

PonyoPenguin wrote:

I don't see why splitting the discussion was necessary. My initial suggestion was to have a general age ratings discussion thread.

This was solely for ESRB and Sega's old VGA. Nothing else.



NOTHING CAN CHANGE MY MIND.
If you look closely at the PEGI thread, Computerfan is the only person to post there who would actually use PEGI.

But why does it need to be?

Because it does.

But that's stupid.

But it is his thread and pegi is different than ESRB.

This.

PEGI is used to rate how friendly the online usage of a game, right? Or is it just an outside of America thing? Like… Britain's version of the ESRB?
Whatever it is, I'm sure it's different than ESRB.

SuperDoom wrote:

Nyambii wrote:

Britain's version of the ESRB?

and almost all of europe

IgDegOo wrote:

SuperDoom wrote:

Nyambii wrote:

Britain's version of the ESRB?

and almost all of europe

MicrosuccSam wrote:

Hi, PEGI user here.
I'm gonna state my opinion, but I don't think Street Fighter games need a 12+ rating.

SuperDoom wrote:

Hope we're all happy now.

MicrosuccSam wrote:

Hi, PEGI user here.
I'm gonna state my opinion, but I don't think Street Fighter games need a 12+ rating.

PecanPi314 wrote:

MicrosuccSam wrote:

Hi, PEGI user here.
I'm gonna state my opinion, but I don't think Street Fighter games need a 12+ rating.

I'm guessing 12+ in ESRB would be T, and I think Street fighter deserves that rating. While I haven't actually played any street fighter games, if something like SSBB can get a T, then SF deserves a T, as it appears the violence is a little more realistic.

computerfan wrote:

On CSM, the parents have rated Mario Kart 8 Deluxe 12+. They have also rated COD3 the same.

computerfan wrote:

On CSM, the parents have rated Mario Kart 8 Deluxe 12+. They have also rated COD3 the same.

PrincessPanda_test_ wrote:

computerfan wrote:

On CSM, the parents have rated Mario Kart 8 Deluxe 12+. They have also rated COD3 the same.

For some reason, an annoying Cloudflare message comes up when I try to access Common Sense Media. And I can't even load the Captcha.

DA HECK?!?!

I've played MK8DX a billion times and I haven't seen a single thing that's 12+. The most violent thing in MK8DX are the bombs, which are treated as cartoony.

Parents are over sensitive these days.

SuperDoom wrote:

PrincessPanda_test_ wrote:

computerfan wrote:

On CSM, the parents have rated Mario Kart 8 Deluxe 12+. They have also rated COD3 the same.

For some reason, an annoying Cloudflare message comes up when I try to access Common Sense Media. And I can't even load the Captcha.

DA HECK?!?!

I've played MK8DX a billion times and I haven't seen a single thing that's 12+. The most violent thing in MK8DX are the bombs, which are treated as cartoony.

Parents are over sensitive these days.

This. I'm not allowed to play Shadow the Hedgehog (an E10+ game, mind you) because of Shadow saying ‘d***’.

PrincessPanda_test_ wrote:

SuperDoom wrote:

PrincessPanda_test_ wrote:

computerfan wrote:

On CSM, the parents have rated Mario Kart 8 Deluxe 12+. They have also rated COD3 the same.

For some reason, an annoying Cloudflare message comes up when I try to access Common Sense Media. And I can't even load the Captcha.

DA HECK?!?!

I've played MK8DX a billion times and I haven't seen a single thing that's 12+. The most violent thing in MK8DX are the bombs, which are treated as cartoony.

Parents are over sensitive these days.

This. I'm not allowed to play Shadow the Hedgehog (an E10+ game, mind you) because of Shadow saying ‘d***’.

My parents do not allow me to play that same game because of gun usage.

PonyoPenguin wrote:

There's a game which was found in court to contain illegal images (can't get into specific detail on Scratch, but it is illegal to even possess these images) that the ESRB never revoked their rating for; if you search for it on their site, it's still rated M.

Could the ESRB's negligence be used in a court of law, I wonder? “Your honor, this game has officially been approved for sale and rated ‘Mature’ by a ratings board that parents and sensitive players regularly depend on. How was I supposed to know it contained illegal content?”

Most stores don't sell the game anymore, but it still turns up in places/online.