✰ ITopic: Complete List of Rejected Suggestions ✰

customhacker

jromagnoli wrote:
https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/topic/252830/?page=1#post-2592554 Making topics for every rejected suggestion is rejected.

It took me a minute to actually understand that…

bigpuppy

customhacker wrote:
jromagnoli wrote:
https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/topic/252830/?page=1#post-2592554 Making topics for every rejected suggestion is rejected.

It took me a minute to actually understand that…

Lol xD

customhacker

That thing was too weird and weirded me out. Yeah. It was weirded out. Isnt it wierd how many times I use weird in this sentence? Weird, right?

duckboycool

78ch3 wrote:
I've been active on scratch for 3 weeks AND I post a lot of constructive comments.

You need two projects shared to become a Scratcher.

Plus, you need to just wait a bit after all of this is met.

stickfiregames

Adding ranks above Scratcher is rejected now.

Also showing when users are banned still need adding.

jromagnoli

Moderating mini-mods

venyanwarrior

Could you add my rejected block? The thread is here: https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/topic/199751/

Transition [sprite 1 v]  [costume 1 v] to [costume 2 v]::looks

jromagnoli

venyanwarrior wrote:
Could you add my rejected block? The thread is here: https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/topic/199751/
Transition [sprite 1 v]  [costume 1 v] to [costume 2 v]::looks

That's not rejected.

bigpuppy

jromagnoli wrote:
venyanwarrior wrote:
Could you add my rejected block? The thread is here: https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/topic/199751/
Transition [sprite 1 v]  [costume 1 v] to [costume 2 v]::looks
That's not rejected.

Yes, if it was rejected, a Scratch Team member would have posted on it and told you it wasn't going to be added and why. (Unless there's something we're missing here..?)

venyanwarrior

bigpuppy wrote:
jromagnoli wrote:
venyanwarrior wrote:
Could you add my rejected block? The thread is here: https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/topic/199751/
Transition [sprite 1 v]  [costume 1 v] to [costume 2 v]::looks
That's not rejected.
Yes, if it was rejected, a Scratch Team member would have posted on it and told you it wasn't going to be added and why. (Unless there's something we're missing here..?)

I didn't close the topic.

Did the ST?

customhacker

OK. NEWS: I cannot update this for about the next week due to me being really busy. I will add them soon!

bigpuppy

"No more studio activity messages" is now rejected - basically removing studio activity messages entirely is rejected.

PkmnQ

jvvg wrote:
There is way too much ambiguity to how this would work. Would it return true of the broadcast was fired at any point since the project was created, since the green flag was clicked, since something else was broadcasted, etc.? If you really want to do something like this, instead just make a variable and set it to 1 and use the equals block.

What if there were multiple? Would it work?

Last edited by PkmnQ (June 12, 2017 14:25:08)

MathlyCat

jromagnoli wrote:
Moderating mini-mods

How is this rejected? I'd like to know if you actually read Paddle's response as he thought only certain types of mini-modding was allowed.

Anyways, banning mini-mods falls under banning F4F/FNaF/etc.

LionHeart70

Is disabling a project from being able to be added to a studio considered “rejected”?

Sheep_maker

LionHeart70 wrote:
Is disabling a project from being able to be added to a studio considered “rejected”?

No but it has been suggested already.

WolfCat67

Just pointing out a quick mistake on one of the topics; you wrote "<broadcast received>", but as you can see, the square thing is invisible. You shouldn't use this: [ v] but instead use this: [[] v], as it then appears correctly in the comments. You can keep stacking [ ]s inside of it to continue the pattern. Also, shouldn't a boolean have a question mark at the end…?

customhacker

Guys - Sorry about not updating this… Lots of IRL stuff for school… This will get updated at the end of this month.

MathlyCat

WolfCat67 wrote:
Just pointing out a quick mistake on one of the topics; you wrote "<broadcast received>", but as you can see, the square thing is invisible. You shouldn't use this: [ v] but instead use this: [[] v], as it then appears correctly in the comments. You can keep stacking [ ]s inside of it to continue the pattern. Also, shouldn't a boolean have a question mark at the end…?

It's not asking for the broadcast?

PkmnQ

This is not a sticky anymore.

Discuss Scratch