BrownieBatter987 wrote:

CutieCow17 wrote:

Austinato wrote:

MasterOfTheTiger wrote:

TigerStores has 22 members. BrownieBatter987 and redglitter are new representatives.

Okay, thanks for the information. It has been updated accordingly.

SHOPS THAT HAVE ACCEPTED INTER-SHOP ORDER COMPLETION:

• TacoCatProuduction's Magical Market
  
• TigerStores
  
• CitruShop
  
• BrownieBatter987's shop (name coming)

The Blocky Shop, too.

And why is my shop not have a name?

legogrl502 wrote:

I do not support inter-shop order completions because it is the duty of each shop to complete its own orders. If you want to take another shop's order, then join the shop. This will make orders less important to the shops. After all, each shop is specifically designed to take requests with just its staff and complete it for the scratcher. It will take emphasis off of ordering and shop advertising because it would be better to just find a shop that specializes in what you need than asking so many people. This scratcher chose a specific shop to go to when they could've gone to any other shop.

jromagnoli wrote:

legogrl502 wrote:

I do not support inter-shop order completions because it is the duty of each shop to complete its own orders. If you want to take another shop's order, then join the shop. This will make orders less important to the shops. After all, each shop is specifically designed to take requests with just its staff and complete it for the scratcher. It will take emphasis off of ordering and shop advertising because it would be better to just find a shop that specializes in what you need than asking so many people. This scratcher chose a specific shop to go to when they could've gone to any other shop.

This, but I feel like shops could share premade items.

legogrl502 wrote:

I do not support inter-shop order completions because it is the duty of each shop to complete its own orders. If you want to take another shop's order, then join the shop. This will make orders less important to the shops. After all, each shop is specifically designed to take requests with just its staff and complete it for the scratcher. It will take emphasis off of ordering and shop advertising because it would be better to just find a shop that specializes in what you need than asking so many people. This scratcher chose a specific shop to go to when they could've gone to any other shop.

bigpuppy wrote:

^^

DevilKing54 wrote:

^^ I agree.

SolarWind12 wrote:

I agree with you wholeheartedly!

BrownieBatter987 wrote:

And why is my shop not have a name?

jromagnoli wrote:

This, but I feel like shops could share premade items.

BrownieBatter987 wrote:

I agree with jromagnoli.

Austinato wrote:

MasterOfTheTiger wrote:

TigerStores has 22 members. BrownieBatter987 and redglitter are new representatives.

Okay, thanks for the information. It has been updated accordingly.

SHOPS THAT HAVE ACCEPTED INTER-SHOP ORDER COMPLETION:

• TacoCatProuduction's Magical Market
  
• TigerStores
  
• CitruShop
  
• The Emoticon Team
  
• The Blocky Shop

I think it's a bad Idea. It would be a good idea (for example if you received an order that you didn't have the equipment to do), but my problem is that they're doing it WITHOUT THE SHOP OWNERS PERMISSION. That's like in the EU if Belgium says to Greece “Your political state is awful, and even though you are trying your best, you're doing a !@#$ job, and so we'll be taking over for now. But then Greece is, of course, proud and don't WANT any help, but even so, Belgium can take over for a while because of a new law they just passed last week. ”No!“ Greece says. ”No no NO!!! “You CAN'T do this!” “Oh yes, we can!” Says Belgium, waving a piece of paper at them, and we will. And of course, they can. What if I got an order, and I thought “This will prove to the world what SWS CAN DO!” So then I'm almost finished the thing, and then Sigton's comes along and says, “Oh Hi SW12, we've just completed your order, thought it would be too much to handle for you. We gave it to the person, explained everything, and she was really glad, said she would DEFINITELY use this and give us credit!” Can you imagine?

Thanks. My opinion is I'm rather opposed to this idea. It may be good for the large shops, such as Sigton's Shop, but small shops like Lightsaber Stores, The Solar Wind Shop and others struggle to get orders at all, without having to worry about other shops swooping in and doing the orders for them. If we need help, we ask our partners. If this motion is passed, my store will leave the USS.

Well, seen as shops of all sizes are members of the USS, why not present the idea but make it opt-out? That would benefit larger shops while still allowing the smaller ones to do business.

OK, but I still think it's a bad idea. If it is carried out you should need to obtain the shop owners permission. Or it could even be an opt-in thing, for small shops who don't have capable staff

I do not support inter-shop order completions because it is the duty of each shop to complete its own orders. If you want to take another shop's order, then join the shop. This will make orders less important to the shops. After all, each shop is specifically designed to take requests with just its staff and complete it for the scratcher. It will take emphasis off of ordering and shop advertising because it would be better to just find a shop that specializes in what you need than asking so many people. This scratcher chose a specific shop to go to when they could've gone to any other shop.

Shops receive orders. Many of them are taken real quick, while others take a little while, and some are just passed by continuously, and slide through the pages, but that isn't where the service comes in. After a few requirements are met, those neglected orders will be added to a list found here at this topic, or another official USS topic, and be open to completion by individuals from shops under the USS. This allows only neglected orders to be routinely completed in the background, while in the foreground, the individual shops are still doing their job. If somehow shops still do not want this, they can opt out completely.

• Not claimed by anybody. If it has been, it must have been dropped more than a week before.
  
• Untaken for 28 days/four weeks.

Austinato wrote:

-snip-

• Appoint justice 4.
  
• Appoint justice 5.
  
• Appoint justice 6.
  
• Appoint justice 7.

• Six representatives for Scratch Request Shop.
  
• Five one representatives for TigerStores.
  
• Two representatives for Gobo Awards.
  
• New representatives for Gentle Rain Coding Studio after the transition in leadership.

• Participate in the passing of a new suggestion, inter-shop old order completions. Support or don't, please provide a reason why!
  
• Soon, I plan on opening an Official representative vote on this suggestion. This is the first since the reconstruction of the representative role in law-passing in March.

• Specialty from TacoCatProuductions, could be now used as “Any.”
  
• Specialty from Legend & 2538's Shop, could be now used as “Any.”
  
• Specialty from the Merry Market, could be now used as “Any.”
  
• Specialty from Bigpuppy's Shop, could be now used as “Any.”
  
• Specialty from The Sunshine Ranch, could be now used as “Any.”
  
• Specialty from Scratch Request Shop, could be now used as “Any.”

• Link to DestroyerXL44's Shop.

jromagnoli wrote:

I am a representative for tiger stores as well.

MasterOfTheTiger wrote:

jromagnoli wrote:

I am a representative for tiger stores as well.

Yeah, so is redglitter and BrownieBatter987, and iluvwhiskers.

Austinato wrote:

Representative List
Here is a collected list of representatives for all of our shops. There are quite a few incorrect ones, and a few more to be added:

BY SHOP/SUBSIDIARY
Scratchcat2538 - CirtuShop

~snip~

Austinato wrote:

-snip-

Austinato wrote:

legogrl502 wrote:

I do not support inter-shop order completions because it is the duty of each shop to complete its own orders. If you want to take another shop's order, then join the shop. This will make orders less important to the shops. After all, each shop is specifically designed to take requests with just its staff and complete it for the scratcher. It will take emphasis off of ordering and shop advertising because it would be better to just find a shop that specializes in what you need than asking so many people. This scratcher chose a specific shop to go to when they could've gone to any other shop.

Okay, thanks for your feedback! I strongly agree with this statement but I'm primarily focusing on orders that have not been completed for a while, or the ones that have been on the incomplete orders list for a while, and not complete involvement in shop activities.

Should I tweak this only to cover those types of incomplete orders only?

bigpuppy wrote:

^^

DevilKing54 wrote:

^^ I agree.

SolarWind12 wrote:

I agree with you wholeheartedly!

Thanks for your input!

BrownieBatter987 wrote:

And why is my shop not have a name?

This was not intended as offensive but I didn't want to mess up the name of your shop (from memory, the shop names and owner matching is getting partially confusing. I didn't want to put Emoji or something else. It should be fixed now.)

jromagnoli wrote:

This, but I feel like shops could share premade items.

That is another good point, building on my previous statement inside this post. This service/benefit will not encourage full order completions from people outside, but rather assistance in difficult, neglected orders that shops may want to forward to others, outside of their shops, who may be able to complete the order for them.

BrownieBatter987 wrote:

I agree with jromagnoli.

Thanks for the input as well!

EDIT NOTE: I thank everyone for their input, and the statements to why you, or why you don't support this suggestion, but I'll be re-considering this suggestion as I see it's a primary concern for many. I could assemble these valid points and re-construct/remove this suggestion at a later time, but until then, I will strongly consider this suggestion's outcomes for many shops. (One shop has even offered to quit in case this gets passed. )

legogrl502 wrote:

Austinato wrote:

-snip-

I agree with the revised inter-shop order completion proposal. The shops should be taking the orders, but the USS can also help with the older orders that the shop never got around to doing. This will make sure that all orders get completed.

scratchcat2538 wrote:

Erm…you spelled CitruShop wrongly.

lkli2346 wrote:

Scratch Request Shop's Representatives
lkli2346, KittenLover7921, MasterOfTheTiger, BLPuppies7526, gems89, snowgryphon, CutieCow17

legogrl502 wrote:

I agree with the revised inter-shop order completion proposal. The shops should be taking the orders, but the USS can also help with the older orders that the shop never got around to doing. This will make sure that all orders get completed.

BrownieBatter987 wrote:

Austinato wrote:

BrownieBatter987 wrote:

And why is my shop not have a name?

This was not intended as offensive but I didn't want to mess up the name of your shop (from memory, the shop names and owner matching is getting partially confusing. I didn't want to put Emoji or something else. It should be fixed now.)

oh, I wasn't offended

jromagnoli wrote:

Same here.

jromagnoli wrote:

legogrl502 wrote:

I do not support inter-shop order completions because it is the duty of each shop to complete its own orders. If you want to take another shop's order, then join the shop. This will make orders less important to the shops. After all, each shop is specifically designed to take requests with just its staff and complete it for the scratcher. It will take emphasis off of ordering and shop advertising because it would be better to just find a shop that specializes in what you need than asking so many people. This scratcher chose a specific shop to go to when they could've gone to any other shop.

This, but I feel like shops could share premade items.