stickfiregames wrote:

customhacker wrote:

I just put something like “debatable whether rejected.”

Where's the evidence for it being rejected?

Also, the lists still don't match up.

customhacker wrote:

stickfiregames wrote:

customhacker wrote:

I just put something like “debatable whether rejected.”

Where's the evidence for it being rejected?

Also, the lists still don't match up.

Where? And I will check the topic.

stickfiregames wrote:

customhacker wrote:

stickfiregames wrote:

customhacker wrote:

I just put something like “debatable whether rejected.”

Where's the evidence for it being rejected?

Also, the lists still don't match up.

Where? And I will check the topic.

Ranks above Scratcher and banning voice acting aren't on the short list in post #2

WolfCat67 wrote:

Blaze349 wrote:

Don't we already have one? What is wrong with the old one?

The old one isn't being updated as frequently, and it doesn't elaborate on many of the points. This one is just in case you want to learn more about each suggestion, and one to link people too just in case. However, I think this one should replace the current sticky, but instead it's an ITopic.

miniepicness wrote:

oh wait I forgot to support this!

Full support!

miniepicness wrote:

Support - Would change scratch.
(this is a joke dont be mean)

nickeljorn wrote:

How about

24. LGBT flag sprite
It doesn't take a long time to find one on google, and someone made a vector pride flag sprite that anyone can use in their projects.

go to x: (0) y: (0) // original position

titanscratch wrote:

https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/topic/251988/?page=1#post-2582765
Go to origin block. It should be rejected. Workaround:

go to x: (0) y: (0) // original position

change x by (. . .)

set x to ((x position) + (. . .))

PkmnQ wrote:

titanscratch wrote:

https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/topic/251988/?page=1#post-2582765
Go to origin block. It should be rejected. Workaround:

go to x: (0) y: (0) // original position

Then we should obsolete

change x by (. . .)

because there is

set x to ((x position) + (. . .))

titanscratch wrote:

https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/topic/251988/?page=1#post-2582765
Go to origin block. It should be rejected. Workaround:

go to x: (0) y: (0) // original position

duckboycool wrote:

jvvg wrote:

14. Banning minor remixes
Remixes are allowed as long as at least something is changed, even if it's minor.

26. Adding a Rank Above Scratcher

DaSpudLord wrote:

Scratch is not a place for people to worry about ranks.The New Scratcher rank only exists to filter spam, and since it only takes 2 weeks to get a promotion, bullying and separation is minimal. Additionally, this would divide the community between those who have a high rank and those who have a low rank, and there would be lots of bragging and bullying coming from users of higher ranks.

15. Live editing

Paddle2See wrote:

I agree that it isn't something we can support right now, because of the moderation and technical issues, however I don't agree with the statement that it teaches bad collaboration techniques. Just because it isn't the way something is done now, or by most people, isn't always a good reason to reject it.

I think this one may be better suited. (At least at the moment)

78ch3 wrote:

jvvg wrote:

26. Adding a Rank Above Scratcher

DaSpudLord wrote:

Scratch is not a place for people to worry about ranks.The New Scratcher rank only exists to filter spam, and since it only takes 2 weeks to get a promotion, bullying and separation is minimal. Additionally, this would divide the community between those who have a high rank and those who have a low rank, and there would be lots of bragging and bullying coming from users of higher ranks.

I've been around for 3 weeks and I didn't get the link to become a scratcher.