Captain_Purple wrote:

I can imagine this situation happening in ROBLOX.
Kid: “how old do you have to be to say numbers?”
Other Kid: “##”
“########”
“agh”

Econinja wrote:

RIP all 13- users. Numbers will now be filtered.
Oh, and that update rolled out today.

StackMasher wrote:

Econinja wrote:

RIP all 13- users. Numbers will now be filtered.
Oh, and that update rolled out today.

So people under 13 can't see any numbers, but older people can?
I thought maybe they just don't want people saying their age, but either way it would be ridiculous

awesome5185 wrote:

Which is more offensive? A person saying to a ROBLOX player that Minecraft is the best, or a person saying to a Minecraft player that ROBLOX is the best? Hehe

MeIoetta wrote:

awesome5185 wrote:

Which is more offensive? A person saying to a ROBLOX player that Minecraft is the best, or a person saying to a Minecraft player that ROBLOX is the best? Hehe

roblox is itself more offensive than all these combined

technoguyx wrote:

MeIoetta wrote:

awesome5185 wrote:

Which is more offensive? A person saying to a ROBLOX player that Minecraft is the best, or a person saying to a Minecraft player that ROBLOX is the best? Hehe

roblox is itself more offensive than all these combined

hahahahah true.

lightspeedmind134 wrote:

technoguyx wrote:

MeIoetta wrote:

awesome5185 wrote:

Which is more offensive? A person saying to a ROBLOX player that Minecraft is the best, or a person saying to a Minecraft player that ROBLOX is the best? Hehe

roblox is itself more offensive than all these combined

hahahahah true.

yep, very! They're basically telling us that we aren't responsible enough to know not to give out phone numbers and addresses despite our parents always talking to us about privacy 24/7. They might also suspect that the 13- players of Roblox will use bigger vocabulary the wrong way? I mean, this is true for some people, but really? 13+? Can't they at least lower it to 11+? Something tells me that Roblox might be taking the many offensive news articles a tad bit too serious, though we should understand that they are only trying to make Roblox a safe environment with positive articles inviting individuals of all ages to play. Maybe the reason why they removed Tix was because they needed an extra money boost from losing some players from articles about cyberbullying in Roblox? Ooh, I have to study this!

lightspeedmind134 wrote:

technoguyx wrote:

MeIoetta wrote:

awesome5185 wrote:

Which is more offensive? A person saying to a ROBLOX player that Minecraft is the best, or a person saying to a Minecraft player that ROBLOX is the best? Hehe

roblox is itself more offensive than all these combined

hahahahah true.

yep, very! They're basically telling us that we aren't responsible enough to know not to give out phone numbers and addresses despite our parents always talking to us about privacy 24/7. They might also suspect that the 13- players of Roblox will use bigger vocabulary the wrong way? I mean, this is true for some people, but really? 13+? Can't they at least lower it to 11+? Something tells me that Roblox might be taking the many offensive news articles a tad bit too serious, though we should understand that they are only trying to make Roblox a safe environment with positive articles inviting individuals of all ages to play. Maybe the reason why they removed Tix was because they needed an extra money boost from losing some players from articles about cyberbullying in Roblox? Ooh, I have to study this!

miniepicness wrote:

lightspeedmind134 wrote:

technoguyx wrote:

MeIoetta wrote:

awesome5185 wrote:

Which is more offensive? A person saying to a ROBLOX player that Minecraft is the best, or a person saying to a Minecraft player that ROBLOX is the best? Hehe

roblox is itself more offensive than all these combined

hahahahah true.

yep, very! They're basically telling us that we aren't responsible enough to know not to give out phone numbers and addresses despite our parents always talking to us about privacy 24/7. They might also suspect that the 13- players of Roblox will use bigger vocabulary the wrong way? I mean, this is true for some people, but really? 13+? Can't they at least lower it to 11+? Something tells me that Roblox might be taking the many offensive news articles a tad bit too serious, though we should understand that they are only trying to make Roblox a safe environment with positive articles inviting individuals of all ages to play. Maybe the reason why they removed Tix was because they needed an extra money boost from losing some players from articles about cyberbullying in Roblox? Ooh, I have to study this!

support for 11+. Rip all 5 year olds who actually enjoy roblox because they have to wait 8 years to actually talk to people.

lightspeedmind134 wrote:

Maybe the reason why they removed Tix was because they needed an extra money boost from losing some players from articles about cyberbullying in Roblox? Ooh, I have to study this!

technoguyx wrote:

lightspeedmind134 wrote:

Maybe the reason why they removed Tix was because they needed an extra money boost from losing some players from articles about cyberbullying in Roblox? Ooh, I have to study this!

You might be on to something there. Most “market” updates such as Limited items, the removal of tickets (and thus of currency trading - which was the main way NBCs could get money) and BC-exclusives overall are all ways to make ROBLOX into a “play-to-win” social game, rather than the original point it had: being a space for creative people to make their own virtual worlds. Now the only point anyone ever sees in creating a popular game is for profit (hence why most of the popular games are just lame copies of popular concepts, i.e. CoD-likes, “High School/Town” games where people hang up and meet people, etc.). With things such as the Developers Program, this is even more explicit (you can earn actual cash from making a popular game).

Guess this was something to be expected from a game that needs huge amounts of money to run (to keep servers active etc). Anyhow, I miss the old, 2007-2009 ROBLOX.

Captain_Purple wrote:

lol all these rumors about peeps getting hacked on march 18th
IT'S NOT REAL
i have 2 step login so any real hackers will need two passwords to get to my account

MeIoetta wrote:

Captain_Purple wrote:

lol all these rumors about peeps getting hacked on march 18th
IT'S NOT REAL
i have 2 step login so any real hackers will need two passwords to get to my account

omg
john doe was a test account for admins to play with regular people incognito.
in 2015 there was a friend glitch and hackers on a hacking site made accounts and friended john
then they created thec0mmunity group and scammed people for robux, that's all.

Econinja wrote:

MeIoetta wrote:

Captain_Purple wrote:

lol all these rumors about peeps getting hacked on march 18th
IT'S NOT REAL
i have 2 step login so any real hackers will need two passwords to get to my account

omg
john doe was a test account for admins to play with regular people incognito.
in 2015 there was a friend glitch and hackers on a hacking site made accounts and friended john
then they created thec0mmunity group and scammed people for robux, that's all.

eeup
but john doe driving happened
that means they wanted to prank us all.
/s
also 60 second rule yee

technoguyx wrote:

lightspeedmind134 wrote:

Maybe the reason why they removed Tix was because they needed an extra money boost from losing some players from articles about cyberbullying in Roblox? Ooh, I have to study this!

You might be on to something there. Most “market” updates such as Limited items, the removal of tickets (and thus of currency trading - which was the main way NBCs could get money) and BC-exclusives overall are all ways to make ROBLOX into a “pay-to-win” social game, rather than the original point it had: being a space for creative people to make their own virtual worlds. Now the only point anyone ever sees in creating a popular game is for profit (hence why most of the popular games are just lame copies of popular concepts, i.e. CoD-likes, “High School/Town” games where people hang up and meet people, etc.). With things such as the Developers Program, this is even more explicit (you can earn actual cash from making a popular game).

Guess this was something to be expected from a game that needs huge amounts of money to run (to keep servers active etc). Anyhow, I miss the old, 2007-2009 ROBLOX.

EDIT: typed “play-to-win” instead of “pay-to-win”, which is pretty much the guiding principle of roblox now

MeIoetta wrote:

Guys
“greg” (a thec0mmunity group admin) said in a post from a deleted group this:

march 24th?