I use math blocks a bit. but there aren't blocks like…

(() ^ ())
 ([cube root v] of (9))
(() !)

(btw, () ! is take 5! = 5*4*3*2*1=120 (i'm pretty sure.) The ()^() can be replaced with the following:

define (base) ^ (exponent)
set [Total v] to [1]
repeat (exponent)
set [Total v] to ((Total) * (base))
end

IDK about the cuberoot of () and ()!

when green flag clicked
forever
see [how many times I change my signature v]
end

If we implement the first one, we should not implement the second one, because then it can be workarounded as so:

((base :: grey) ^ ((1) / (3)) :: operators)

Also your workaround for exponent will not work for decimal or negative exponents. One that works for decimal exponents (but will break for negative bases) is this:

([e ^ v] of ((exponent :: grey) * ([ln v] of (base :: grey)))

Finally, I'm not sure how useful the factorial function is, but I think if it's implemented it should be labelled as factorial but actually call the Gamma function (which basically is factorial that works on decimals / negatives).

Ok! makes sense!

when green flag clicked
forever
see [how many times I change my signature v]
end

JRR078 wrote:

I use math blocks a bit. but there aren't blocks like…

(() ^ ())
 ([cube root v] of (9))
(() !)

(btw, () ! is take 5! = 5*4*3*2*1=120 (i'm pretty sure.) The ()^() can be replaced with the following:

define (base) ^ (exponent)
set [Total v] to [1]
repeat (exponent)
set [Total v] to ((Total) * (base))
end

IDK about the cuberoot of () and ()!

Cube root is literally a number to the 1/3 power. Already easily workaroundable; no support.

lol the quote

when green flag clicked
forever
see [how many times I change my signature v]
end