It would be nice if alerts were more specific, as sometimes it's confusing why you got them,
Sure, you could just email scratch, but some people aren't allowed to use their email, or they forgot their email password

Can you list some things to make the alerts more specific?

I do want to agree with this idea. Scratch needs to have the alerting system have a reform, and I already have seen complaints of this.

DownsGameClub wrote:

Can you list some things to make the alerts more specific?

I do want to agree with this idea. Scratch needs to have the alerting system have a reform, and I already have seen complaints of this.

'Thanks for the report! We checked it out, but we couldn't find the image you were talking about. If you decide to report the project again, please link to the original image.'
'Please don't share comments saying mean stuff or gossiping about other Scratchers, no matter what you think they've done. If you see a disrespectful or inappropriate comment from someone else, don't respond. Instead, click the report button or use the Contact Us Link at the bottom of every page to report them to the Scratch Team, and we'll sort it out.'
'Thanks for the report! We checked it out and couldn’t find anything wrong with the content you reported. Please only report projects, comments, profiles, or studios that are mean or inappropriate. Check out the Community Guidelines (linked at the bottom of every page) for help deciding what is or isn't ok for Scratch.'

False reports are the only ambiguous ones you've noted.

Also this is a duplicate made by NanoRook; assuming that you realize the alerts for breaking a rule are descriptive.

MathlyCat wrote:

False reports are the only ambiguous ones you've noted.

Also this is a duplicate made by NanoRook; assuming that you realize the alerts for breaking a rule are descriptive.

'We removed this project because it is too violent for the Scratch website. Scratch is for kids ages 8 and up, so it's important that everything shared is appropriate for all ages.' that isn't very descriptivre, hm?

KawaiiCatGirl- wrote:

MathlyCat wrote:

False reports are the only ambiguous ones you've noted.

Also this is a duplicate made by NanoRook; assuming that you realize the alerts for breaking a rule are descriptive.

'We removed this project because it is too violent for the Scratch website. Scratch is for kids ages 8 and up, so it's important that everything shared is appropriate for all ages.' that isn't very descriptivre, hm?

Yes it is. It literally explains it's too violent for Scratch…

Are you sure you're reading carefully?

MathlyCat wrote:

KawaiiCatGirl- wrote:

MathlyCat wrote:

False reports are the only ambiguous ones you've noted.

Also this is a duplicate made by NanoRook; assuming that you realize the alerts for breaking a rule are descriptive.

'We removed this project because it is too violent for the Scratch website. Scratch is for kids ages 8 and up, so it's important that everything shared is appropriate for all ages.' that isn't very descriptivre, hm?

Yes it is. It literally explains it's too violent for Scratch…

Are you sure you're reading carefully?

Well, what part of it was to violent?
It didn't really explain what part of it was violent.
Some people may consdier scratching violent, so, well, it really wasn't clear

KawaiiCatGirl- wrote:

MathlyCat wrote:

KawaiiCatGirl- wrote:

MathlyCat wrote:

False reports are the only ambiguous ones you've noted.

Also this is a duplicate made by NanoRook; assuming that you realize the alerts for breaking a rule are descriptive.

'We removed this project because it is too violent for the Scratch website. Scratch is for kids ages 8 and up, so it's important that everything shared is appropriate for all ages.' that isn't very descriptivre, hm?

Yes it is. It literally explains it's too violent for Scratch…

Are you sure you're reading carefully?

Well, what part of it was to violent?
It didn't really explain what part of it was violent.
Some people may consdier scratching violent, so, well, it really wasn't clear

“Too violent”

That tells me the project had something that was not suitable for all ages.

Again, I hope you're reading and analyzing carefully; they seem to cover the point perfectly fine.

You also have no business knowing what exactly it was; unless you reported it

MathlyCat wrote:

KawaiiCatGirl- wrote:

MathlyCat wrote:

KawaiiCatGirl- wrote:

MathlyCat wrote:

False reports are the only ambiguous ones you've noted.

Also this is a duplicate made by NanoRook; assuming that you realize the alerts for breaking a rule are descriptive.

'We removed this project because it is too violent for the Scratch website. Scratch is for kids ages 8 and up, so it's important that everything shared is appropriate for all ages.' that isn't very descriptivre, hm?

Yes it is. It literally explains it's too violent for Scratch…

Are you sure you're reading carefully?

Well, what part of it was to violent?
It didn't really explain what part of it was violent.
Some people may consdier scratching violent, so, well, it really wasn't clear

“Too violent”

That tells me the project had something that was not suitable for all ages.

Again, I hope you're reading and analyzing carefully; they seem to cover the point perfectly fine.

You also have no business knowing what exactly it was; unless you reported it

The project didn't seem violent, it was really just a joke. All she was doing was exploding a zombie-like guy.
It was more NFE IMHO