Zaneki wrote:

Followed the studio, and commented on the forum thread. :P

And, please, the spamming thing getting on my nerves. I have to agree with AlphaAxle.

LeScratcher wrote:

Zaneki wrote:

Followed the studio, and commented on the forum thread. :P

And, please, the spamming thing getting on my nerves. I have to agree with AlphaAxle.

I've been subtracting ranking points like crazy. I can't control it, you do know…

LeScratcher wrote:

Zaneki wrote:

Followed the studio, and commented on the forum thread. :P

And, please, the spamming thing getting on my nerves. I have to agree with AlphaAxle.

I've been subtracting ranking points like crazy. I can't control it, you do know…

Z-demensions wrote:

LeScratcher wrote:

Zaneki wrote:

Followed the studio, and commented on the forum thread. :P

And, please, the spamming thing getting on my nerves. I have to agree with AlphaAxle.

I've been subtracting ranking points like crazy. I can't control it, you do know…

ive got to say, i'm getting messages from this forum every two minutes, about one fourth of them are spammy

LeScratcher wrote:

Zaneki wrote:

Followed the studio, and commented on the forum thread. :P

And, please, the spamming thing getting on my nerves. I have to agree with AlphaAxle.

I've been subtracting ranking points like crazy. I can't control it, you do know…

Zaneki wrote:

LeScratcher wrote:

Zaneki wrote:

Followed the studio, and commented on the forum thread. :P

And, please, the spamming thing getting on my nerves. I have to agree with AlphaAxle.

I've been subtracting ranking points like crazy. I can't control it, you do know…

Here's the problem, though. A lot of members are apathetic about the whole ranking system, myself included. I think a better idea would be to give warnings, and if a person got three or more warnings, they are booted from the collab. And they can have their number of warnings decreased / reset after a week or two of appropriate behavior.

Zaneki wrote:

LeScratcher wrote:

Zaneki wrote:

Followed the studio, and commented on the forum thread. :P

And, please, the spamming thing getting on my nerves. I have to agree with AlphaAxle.

I've been subtracting ranking points like crazy. I can't control it, you do know…

Here's the problem, though. A lot of members are apathetic about the whole ranking system, myself included. I think a better idea would be to give warnings, and if a person got three or more warnings, they are booted from the collab. And they can have their number of warnings decreased / reset after a week or two of appropriate behavior.

LeScratcher wrote:

Z-demensions wrote:

LeScratcher wrote:

Zaneki wrote:

Followed the studio, and commented on the forum thread. :P

And, please, the spamming thing getting on my nerves. I have to agree with AlphaAxle.

I've been subtracting ranking points like crazy. I can't control it, you do know…

ive got to say, i'm getting messages from this forum every two minutes, about one fourth of them are spammy

Not like I didn't tell everyone to stop, like…let my count…7 times!

LeScratcher wrote:

From now on. STOP with the unnecessary comments. For those of you wanting to gain ranking, and everyone else, reply to this comment if you followed this thread (and @LS_Inc, an the official studio) so I know you are ready to get things started. Otherwise, your ranking may fall. If you haven't, follow it, then comment. If you have commented, check to see if your name has a ‘ ’ next to it in the rankings section of the first post.Otherwise, comment again. I WILL NOT begin until everyone has commented with confirmation.

LeScratcher wrote:

Zaneki wrote:

LeScratcher wrote:

Zaneki wrote:

Followed the studio, and commented on the forum thread. :P

And, please, the spamming thing getting on my nerves. I have to agree with AlphaAxle.

I've been subtracting ranking points like crazy. I can't control it, you do know…

Here's the problem, though. A lot of members are apathetic about the whole ranking system, myself included. I think a better idea would be to give warnings, and if a person got three or more warnings, they are booted from the collab. And they can have their number of warnings decreased / reset after a week or two of appropriate behavior.

Eh…apathetic. It is a warning system. Many people can't take another warning before the ranking hits 0 and they are kicked. Also, I beg to differ. People are asking to curate the studio, share the account, etc. If your ranking is under 10 when a project is released, you won't be anywhere in the credits. :3

Z-demensions wrote:

Zaneki wrote:

LeScratcher wrote:

Zaneki wrote:

Followed the studio, and commented on the forum thread. :P

And, please, the spamming thing getting on my nerves. I have to agree with AlphaAxle.

I've been subtracting ranking points like crazy. I can't control it, you do know…

Here's the problem, though. A lot of members are apathetic about the whole ranking system, myself included. I think a better idea would be to give warnings, and if a person got three or more warnings, they are booted from the collab. And they can have their number of warnings decreased / reset after a week or two of appropriate behavior.

that may be true, but for people like me at least, rankings are a lot funner than warnings, and scratch is supposed to make things fun right?

Zaneki wrote:

Z-demensions wrote:

Zaneki wrote:

LeScratcher wrote:

Zaneki wrote:

Followed the studio, and commented on the forum thread. :P

And, please, the spamming thing getting on my nerves. I have to agree with AlphaAxle.

I've been subtracting ranking points like crazy. I can't control it, you do know…

Here's the problem, though. A lot of members are apathetic about the whole ranking system, myself included. I think a better idea would be to give warnings, and if a person got three or more warnings, they are booted from the collab. And they can have their number of warnings decreased / reset after a week or two of appropriate behavior.

that may be true, but for people like me at least, rankings are a lot funner than warnings, and scratch is supposed to make things fun right?

They may be more fun, but they're ineffective. Even if it seems a bit stringent, I think having a three-strikes system would get and keep everyone in shape. When the novelty of “points” wears off, no one will care about what they post anymore.
Plus, there are a lot of younger kids in this collab, and when one person starts spamming, it tends to snowball out of control.

LeScratcher wrote:

LeScratcher wrote:

From now on. STOP with the unnecessary comments. For those of you wanting to gain ranking, and everyone else, reply to this comment if you followed this thread (and @LS_Inc, an the official studio) so I know you are ready to get things started. Otherwise, your ranking may fall. If you haven't, follow it, then comment. If you have commented, check to see if your name has a ‘ ’ next to it in the rankings section of the first post.Otherwise, comment again. I WILL NOT begin until everyone has commented with confirmation.

13 more confirmations…

Zaneki wrote:

Z-demensions wrote:

Zaneki wrote:

LeScratcher wrote:

Zaneki wrote:

Followed the studio, and commented on the forum thread. :P

And, please, the spamming thing getting on my nerves. I have to agree with AlphaAxle.

I've been subtracting ranking points like crazy. I can't control it, you do know…

Here's the problem, though. A lot of members are apathetic about the whole ranking system, myself included. I think a better idea would be to give warnings, and if a person got three or more warnings, they are booted from the collab. And they can have their number of warnings decreased / reset after a week or two of appropriate behavior.

that may be true, but for people like me at least, rankings are a lot funner than warnings, and scratch is supposed to make things fun right?

They may be more fun, but they're ineffective. Even if it seems a bit stringent, I think having a three-strikes system would get and keep everyone in shape. When the novelty of “points” wears off, no one will care about what they post anymore.
Plus, there are a lot of younger kids in this collab, and when one person starts spamming, it tends to snowball out of control.

LeScratcher wrote:

Zaneki wrote:

Z-demensions wrote:

Zaneki wrote:

LeScratcher wrote:

Zaneki wrote:

Followed the studio, and commented on the forum thread. :P

And, please, the spamming thing getting on my nerves. I have to agree with AlphaAxle.

I've been subtracting ranking points like crazy. I can't control it, you do know…

Here's the problem, though. A lot of members are apathetic about the whole ranking system, myself included. I think a better idea would be to give warnings, and if a person got three or more warnings, they are booted from the collab. And they can have their number of warnings decreased / reset after a week or two of appropriate behavior.

that may be true, but for people like me at least, rankings are a lot funner than warnings, and scratch is supposed to make things fun right?

They may be more fun, but they're ineffective. Even if it seems a bit stringent, I think having a three-strikes system would get and keep everyone in shape. When the novelty of “points” wears off, no one will care about what they post anymore.
Plus, there are a lot of younger kids in this collab, and when one person starts spamming, it tends to snowball out of control.

True. How about i have both? BTW I don't think ANYONE would enjoy doing hard work and not getting credited.

Zaneki wrote:

LeScratcher wrote:

Zaneki wrote:

Z-demensions wrote:

Zaneki wrote:

LeScratcher wrote:

Zaneki wrote:

Followed the studio, and commented on the forum thread. :P

And, please, the spamming thing getting on my nerves. I have to agree with AlphaAxle.

I've been subtracting ranking points like crazy. I can't control it, you do know…

Here's the problem, though. A lot of members are apathetic about the whole ranking system, myself included. I think a better idea would be to give warnings, and if a person got three or more warnings, they are booted from the collab. And they can have their number of warnings decreased / reset after a week or two of appropriate behavior.

that may be true, but for people like me at least, rankings are a lot funner than warnings, and scratch is supposed to make things fun right?

They may be more fun, but they're ineffective. Even if it seems a bit stringent, I think having a three-strikes system would get and keep everyone in shape. When the novelty of “points” wears off, no one will care about what they post anymore.
Plus, there are a lot of younger kids in this collab, and when one person starts spamming, it tends to snowball out of control.

True. How about i have both? BTW I don't think ANYONE would enjoy doing hard work and not getting credited.

…Was about to say.
It's technically plagiarism / theft if you don't credit someone. Even if one has spammed, it's a natural right to be credited for one's work.

Zaneki wrote:

LeScratcher wrote:

Zaneki wrote:

Z-demensions wrote:

Zaneki wrote:

LeScratcher wrote:

Zaneki wrote:

Followed the studio, and commented on the forum thread. :P

And, please, the spamming thing getting on my nerves. I have to agree with AlphaAxle.

I've been subtracting ranking points like crazy. I can't control it, you do know…

Here's the problem, though. A lot of members are apathetic about the whole ranking system, myself included. I think a better idea would be to give warnings, and if a person got three or more warnings, they are booted from the collab. And they can have their number of warnings decreased / reset after a week or two of appropriate behavior.

that may be true, but for people like me at least, rankings are a lot funner than warnings, and scratch is supposed to make things fun right?

They may be more fun, but they're ineffective. Even if it seems a bit stringent, I think having a three-strikes system would get and keep everyone in shape. When the novelty of “points” wears off, no one will care about what they post anymore.
Plus, there are a lot of younger kids in this collab, and when one person starts spamming, it tends to snowball out of control.

True. How about i have both? BTW I don't think ANYONE would enjoy doing hard work and not getting credited.

…Was about to say.
It's technically plagiarism / theft if you don't credit someone. Even if one has spammed, it's a natural right to be credited for one's work.

Z-demensions wrote:

Zaneki wrote:

LeScratcher wrote:

Zaneki wrote:

Z-demensions wrote:

Zaneki wrote:

LeScratcher wrote:

Zaneki wrote:

Followed the studio, and commented on the forum thread. :P

And, please, the spamming thing getting on my nerves. I have to agree with AlphaAxle.

I've been subtracting ranking points like crazy. I can't control it, you do know…

Here's the problem, though. A lot of members are apathetic about the whole ranking system, myself included. I think a better idea would be to give warnings, and if a person got three or more warnings, they are booted from the collab. And they can have their number of warnings decreased / reset after a week or two of appropriate behavior.

that may be true, but for people like me at least, rankings are a lot funner than warnings, and scratch is supposed to make things fun right?

They may be more fun, but they're ineffective. Even if it seems a bit stringent, I think having a three-strikes system would get and keep everyone in shape. When the novelty of “points” wears off, no one will care about what they post anymore.
Plus, there are a lot of younger kids in this collab, and when one person starts spamming, it tends to snowball out of control.

True. How about i have both? BTW I don't think ANYONE would enjoy doing hard work and not getting credited.

…Was about to say.
It's technically plagiarism / theft if you don't credit someone. Even if one has spammed, it's a natural right to be credited for one's work.

well you don't want to credit people who did nothing but join the collab, it isn't that hard to keep your rank above ten if you are able do to things (e.g. not on vacation) so i think it's a good idea.