Discuss Scratch
- Discussion Forums
- » Developing Scratch Extensions
- » Am I the only one that finds the turbowarp extension situation circular?
![[RSS Feed]](//cdn.scratch.mit.edu/scratchr2/static/__9c6d3f90ec5f8ace6d3e8ea1e684b778__//djangobb_forum/img/feed-icon-small.png "[RSS Feed]")
![[RSS Feed]](http://cdn.scratch.mit.edu/scratchr2/static/__9c6d3f90ec5f8ace6d3e8ea1e684b778__//djangobb_forum/img/feed-icon-small.png "[RSS Feed]"){kind=icon}
- monkeymoviemaker
-
Scratcher
38 posts
Am I the only one that finds the turbowarp extension situation circular?
First, scratch has block based coding with extensions. Turbowarp adds custom extensions. Now, in development is a way to make extensions using a block based coding language. This reminds me of, oh, I don't know, SUBROUTINES in native scratch? Next is almost certainly a way to make custom blocks within that. People forget that with each bit of user-friendliness, you lose features and usability. Past a point, you're not making anything easier, just adding layers. Thoughts?
- julianlukasiak
-
Scratcher
100+ posts
Am I the only one that finds the turbowarp extension situation circular?
Use turbobuilder-steel.vercel.app
✊ Support the suggestion HERE by adding this button to your signature ✊
My social media:
Youtube
Snail ide
Planet Minecraft
another acount/inne konto
My turbowarp extensions gallery
- Discussion Forums
- » Developing Scratch Extensions
-
» Am I the only one that finds the turbowarp extension situation circular?