We could use an AI block

AI answer (input): You ask a question, AI answers.

AI answer (answer) :: sensing

No support. Scratch is a non-profit and you need money to use ChatGPT Tokens. Plus, the whole inappropriate thing.

tagrim123 wrote:

No support. Scratch is a non-profit and you need money to use ChatGPT Tokens.

This suggestion did not say anything about ChatGPT. It only suggested AI which could be anything.

tagrim123 wrote:

Plus, the whole inappropriate thing.

This is true, it does need a filter.

Scratchedbyyou_forum wrote:

tagrim123 wrote:

No support. Scratch is a non-profit and you need money to use ChatGPT Tokens.

This suggestion did not say anything about ChatGPT. It only suggested AI which could be anything.

tagrim123 wrote:

Plus, the whole inappropriate thing.

This is true, it does need a filter.

adds filter

Scratchedbyyou_forum wrote:

tagrim123 wrote:

No support. Scratch is a non-profit and you need money to use ChatGPT Tokens.

This suggestion did not say anything about ChatGPT. It only suggested AI which could be anything.

tagrim123 wrote:

Plus, the whole inappropriate thing.

This is true, it does need a filter.

also the text to speech thing has a pretty bad filter so you can bypass the filter

I don't think we need generative AI on Scratch— it's like every single service is hopping onto this train for some reason. I don't like saying “it's unnecessary”, but come on, it really is.

bloxyandbrew wrote:

We could use an AI block

AI answer (input): You ask a question, AI answers.

AI answer (answer) :: sensing

no support, the moderation could be easily broken, and it's too costly for a non-profit site.

also, why would it even be necessary? big companies are implementing AI into everything they can for absolutely no reason. for example: kahoot did this with their new AI quiz creation feature, and more recently, even minecraft did this with their new AI chatbot, Merl (and failed miserably imo). it looks like the type of thing that people would ask for, and when it would actually be implemented, people would forget that it exists in a couple of weeks and just move on.

YtArie5 wrote:

I don't think we need generative AI on Scratch— it's like every single service is hopping onto this train for some reason. I don't like saying “it's unnecessary”, but come on, it really is.

Every suggestion's unnecessary. If it's necessary then it's a bug report. - someone else

bloxyandbrew wrote:

We could use an AI block

AI answer (input): You ask a question, AI answers.

AI answer (answer) :: sensing

scratch just doesn't work like that. There is no reason anyone, EVER, in a code would be asking AI a question. This suggestion has nothing to do with scratch. There are 0 uses for this.

This would use a lot of internet data and take forever…

no, who is al?

im just gonna delete this forum post