You've heard of the argument by now, so lets settle it.
who would win in a 1 gorilla vs 100 humans fight?

Assuming that the humans will be fighting this hypothetical gorilla bare-handed, I think the gorilla might win. But the humans could probably cooperate to overpower the gorilla. But I think the gorilla has a slightly higher chance of winning.

If the humans are allowed caveman-era weaponry like spears, they could definitely win against the gorilla.

it depends on the group of humans if they don't care about dying and actually work together they win no-diff but if the humans care about there life's and don't work together the gorilla wins no-diff

the humans would undoubtedly win, there shouldn't be any debate
1 gorilla VS 100 humans implies that the humans are working together against the gorilla, so they aren't going to divide
gorillas lack the intellectual ability that humans have held for years, so of course the gorilla would lose

DuWeido wrote:

You've heard of the argument by now, so lets settle it.
who would win in a 1 gorilla vs 100 humans fight?

the real question is
100 british people vs 100 americans

temsterriblegames wrote:

DuWeido wrote:

You've heard of the argument by now, so lets settle it.
who would win in a 1 gorilla vs 100 humans fight?

the real question is
100 british people vs 100 americans

oh I got think about that one

100 gorillas versus 1 prime Mike Tyson (brass knuckles) (bloodlusted)

I had a powerscaling topic at one point but I can't find it.

Nes1Owe_Alt wrote:

100 gorillas versus 1 prime Mike Tyson (brass knuckles) (bloodlusted)

I had a powerscaling topic at one point but I can't find it.

I know this has nothing to with the whole 1 gorilla vs 100 humans thing but curious george can solo dif anyone prove me wrong

Our ancestors hunted down mammoths with far less than 100 humans per mammoth. I think 100 humans versus a gorilla wins.

builderbob22 wrote:

Our ancestors hunted down mammoths with far less than 100 humans per mammoth. I think 100 humans versus a gorilla wins.

we are talking about the current generation not back then

CosmicStarV1 wrote:

builderbob22 wrote:

Our ancestors hunted down mammoths with far less than 100 humans per mammoth. I think 100 humans versus a gorilla wins.

we are talking about the current generation not back then

Yes. An average human powerscales at a 10-B. A pre-historic human powerscales to 10-A, 9-C with weapons.

If you have no clue what I'm talking about, get into powerscaling. It's very nerdy but enjoyable.

CosmicStarV1 wrote:

curious george can solo dif anyone prove me wrong

Goku (peak) versus Curious George (blindfolded) (no limbs) (1% curiosity)

Nes1Owe_Alt wrote:

CosmicStarV1 wrote:

builderbob22 wrote:

Our ancestors hunted down mammoths with far less than 100 humans per mammoth. I think 100 humans versus a gorilla wins.

we are talking about the current generation not back then

Yes. An average human powerscales at a 10-B. A pre-historic human powerscales to 10-A, 9-C with weapons.

If you have no clue what I'm talking about, get into powerscaling. It's very nerdy but enjoyable.

CosmicStarV1 wrote:

curious george can solo dif anyone prove me wrong

Goku (peak) versus Curious George (blindfolded) (no limbs) (1% curiosity)

Curious George Solos no diff

can confirm that either the humans or gorilla would win

l am prattv sure that the 100 gorillas would win.