Think about it, a 3D scratch, that's not something a lot of Scratch's users can do, and unlike Game Builder Garage 1, this sequel would have a syntax nearly identical to Scratch, Meaning you won't have to deal with the Scratch Jr-like nodons stitched together reaching across the screen, scrambled EVERYWHERE with different meanings, sliders, galore
maybe for the large amount of people who want to make a platformer, make gravity blocks to activate gravity and set density, It's not a bad idea,
If the person making a project in GBG 2 wanted no gravity to deal with, they just set it of with a block

GBG 1 is too confusing, plus it pretends everyone just wants to make a simple platformer with the Person nodon, so people who want to do something like make the person nodon accelerate in speed over time, they can't edit the premade coding, so they have to use a moving object with a map, calculator, etc, making coding the Person nodon more complicated than it should be.

There should be AT LEAST 10 people active on Scratch right now who want this type of Nintendo game.

You and Nintendo could make millions off of something like this, even competing with Dreams' (PS4-5) experienced nodon coding
+since dreams is dead this is a good time to make something like this

OR, go pitch the idea to XBOX, Microsoft has a lot of indie PC games

I mean……. We already have SmileBASIC 4, as well as FUZE4.They're both coding languages on the Nintendo Switch, they're just not as common as Scratch would be on such a console.

I still agree that Nintendo's GBG is too confusing and can also be very messy the more graphic objects you try to handle in it. But at least it is “something” I suppose that is better than “nothing at all”.

I guess it would be neat if Scratch did have something on the NS, but it is NOT likely because they don't have the dev kit. I am also sure that this is NOT on the priority list, as they are quite busy with other priorities.

NMario84 wrote:

I mean……. We already have SmileBASIC 4, as well as FUZE4.They're both coding languages on the Nintendo Switch, they're just not as common as Scratch would be on such a console..

Oh hey look 2 games that were never advertised.

I really want a sequel to game builder garage done properly by not having to do the among us wires task every single time you want to make a change (and good online)

I have to say that theyll have to make some changes like sound, physics for the blocks (so like it'll bounce around when you drag it (ayo)), and figuring out how to make it not frustrating because of the small screen but yeah

WindowsAdmin wrote:

I really want a sequel to game builder garage done properly by not having to do the among us wires task every single time you want to make a change (and good online)

I have to say that theyll have to make some changes like sound, physics for the blocks (so like it'll bounce around when you drag it (ayo)), and figuring out how to make it not frustrating because of the small screen but yeah

FINALLY SOMEONE WHO AGREES!

MBPU (bump)

Magudragon wrote:

NMario84 wrote:

I mean……. We already have SmileBASIC 4, as well as FUZE4.They're both coding languages on the Nintendo Switch, they're just not as common as Scratch would be on such a console..

Oh hey look 2 games that were never advertised.

I didn't know about SmileBASIC until NMario mentioned it about 5 days ago, but as someone who continually takes advantage of the offers on the Nintendo eShop I found FUZE4 back in 2020

Sad news: No one can/will collaborate with Nintendo except other huge companies, and this likely won't interest most people.

this doesn't really fit for the ATs. it should probably go in QaS or suggestions

8to16 wrote:

this doesn't really fit for the ATs. it should probably go in QaS or suggestions

Did you read the OP?

This is not suggesting anything for the ST, and it's a hypothetical question, meaning it's a bad idea for QaS.

BigNate469 wrote:

(#10)
This is not suggesting anything for the ST

it's suggesting they partner with nintendo and make another “game builder garage”

8to16 wrote:

BigNate469 wrote:

(#10)
This is not suggesting anything for the ST

it's suggesting they partner with nintendo and make another “game builder garage”

Technically, it wasn't really “suggesting” as it's more so a hypothetical question.