TechHamster wrote:

Let's talk about the bite of ‘83. This is a mysterious thing. No one knows much but that some friends of the crying child’s brother(?) stuffed him into a Fredbear animatronic, and the robot unknowingly chomped him up. Although many people have said “Well, the bite was when someone's frontal lobe got chomped off, and it doesn't show that!” Well, the very pixelly graphics in the minigames weren't so great, so I think that might have just been another bite. The bite of ‘83 (you can see the year in another minigame on a television) and the bite of ’87. The bite of ‘83 happened at the crying child’s birthday party during the Fredbear stage of FFP. Then, in FNAF 2, the next game timeline-wise, another bite happened, presumably Mangle did it. Here's my theory: The crying child was the first death at FFP. He then turned into the Marionette, and I explained the rest in another theory. So there, the crying child was the first “murder” at FFP. It actually wasn't a murder. Ok, people, you know the drill. If you like this theory, respond saying you do, and if you don't agree, respond stating your theory on the bite of '83. Thanks.

TechHamster wrote:

Let's talk about the bite of ‘83. This is a mysterious thing. No one knows much but that some friends of the crying child’s brother(?) stuffed him into a Fredbear animatronic, and the robot unknowingly chomped him up. Although many people have said “Well, the bite was when someone's frontal lobe got chomped off, and it doesn't show that!” Well, the very pixelly graphics in the minigames weren't so great, so I think that might have just been another bite. The bite of ‘83 (you can see the year in another minigame on a television) and the bite of ’87. The bite of ‘83 happened at the crying child’s birthday party during the Fredbear stage of FFP. Then, in FNAF 2, the next game timeline-wise, another bite happened, presumably Mangle did it. Here's my theory: The crying child was the first death at FFP. He then turned into the Marionette, and I explained the rest in another theory. So there, the crying child was the first “murder” at FFP. It actually wasn't a murder. Ok, people, you know the drill. If you like this theory, respond saying you do, and if you don't agree, respond stating your theory on the bite of '83. Thanks.

fireaction2001 wrote:

TechHamster wrote:

Let's talk about the bite of ‘83. This is a mysterious thing. No one knows much but that some friends of the crying child’s brother(?) stuffed him into a Fredbear animatronic, and the robot unknowingly chomped him up. Although many people have said “Well, the bite was when someone's frontal lobe got chomped off, and it doesn't show that!” Well, the very pixelly graphics in the minigames weren't so great, so I think that might have just been another bite. The bite of ‘83 (you can see the year in another minigame on a television) and the bite of ’87. The bite of ‘83 happened at the crying child’s birthday party during the Fredbear stage of FFP. Then, in FNAF 2, the next game timeline-wise, another bite happened, presumably Mangle did it. Here's my theory: The crying child was the first death at FFP. He then turned into the Marionette, and I explained the rest in another theory. So there, the crying child was the first “murder” at FFP. It actually wasn't a murder. Ok, people, you know the drill. If you like this theory, respond saying you do, and if you don't agree, respond stating your theory on the bite of '83. Thanks.

I agree with that other guy. Scott wouldn't just drop a new bite on us when he's finishing the story! I had a theory that “the bite of ‘83” is actually the bite of ’87 because Josh died in 1987 due to the loss of his frontal lobe.

And one more thing, the minigames couldn't have taken place in 1987. I know one of you said that the TV commercial said 1983 because that's when Fredbear's was founded, but think about it. In fnaf2, which takes place in 1987, the phone guy says that Fredbear's Family Diner has been closed for YEARS.

I also agree with another guy that the purple guy could've been Josh's dad, and all of his victims are kids that have oppressed Josh or his first victims were but then he went crazy or something and started killing ALL the kids.

TechHamster wrote:

fireaction2001 wrote:

TechHamster wrote:

Let's talk about the bite of ‘83. This is a mysterious thing. No one knows much but that some friends of the crying child’s brother(?) stuffed him into a Fredbear animatronic, and the robot unknowingly chomped him up. Although many people have said “Well, the bite was when someone's frontal lobe got chomped off, and it doesn't show that!” Well, the very pixelly graphics in the minigames weren't so great, so I think that might have just been another bite. The bite of ‘83 (you can see the year in another minigame on a television) and the bite of ’87. The bite of ‘83 happened at the crying child’s birthday party during the Fredbear stage of FFP. Then, in FNAF 2, the next game timeline-wise, another bite happened, presumably Mangle did it. Here's my theory: The crying child was the first death at FFP. He then turned into the Marionette, and I explained the rest in another theory. So there, the crying child was the first “murder” at FFP. It actually wasn't a murder. Ok, people, you know the drill. If you like this theory, respond saying you do, and if you don't agree, respond stating your theory on the bite of '83. Thanks.

I agree with that other guy. Scott wouldn't just drop a new bite on us when he's finishing the story! I had a theory that “the bite of ‘83” is actually the bite of ’87 because Josh died in 1987 due to the loss of his frontal lobe.

And one more thing, the minigames couldn't have taken place in 1987. I know one of you said that the TV commercial said 1983 because that's when Fredbear's was founded, but think about it. In fnaf2, which takes place in 1987, the phone guy says that Fredbear's Family Diner has been closed for YEARS.

I also agree with another guy that the purple guy could've been Josh's dad, and all of his victims are kids that have oppressed Josh or his first victims were but then he went crazy or something and started killing ALL the kids.

I actually agree with the bite of ‘87 being a delayed death of the child, which was in 1987. Although, I do believe that when Josh died, he became the puppet, because he died at the time of FNAF 2’s pizzeria. Also, because he's the crying child, and he strongly resembles the puppet, with his looks, and everything else. Then, purple guy killed children for the loss of his own. The Marionette, angry that his father chose the violent path. The Puppet decided to bring the bodies he stuffed into the animatronics to life, as an army of bots to destroy him and any other employees that they could. They only come alive at night, so they could only get their hands on the nightguards, which unravels the whole purpose of the game and it's story. So they try and try until there were new animatronics to use as an army. This story could be reinvented by saying that they used Mangle to do the bite of ‘87. Back to the first story. They then kill phone guy in FNAF 1, the kitchen camera being a hideout for the puppet. Then, when the Puppet is finally defeated after years of neglect, he comes back as a phantom in FNAF 3. Not being an ultimate power force, he uses himself to block you, so the next best thing, (Springtrap,) a chance to kill you. But this story is also impossible. It goes in a loop for the rest of the timeline, that is, until the possible next game. It goes back to 1983, where they auction off the parts from the FNAF 3 horror attraction inferno from 2027, or 2017. Either one, Plushtrap is probably the thing auctioned off, or the plushies or cupcake, or Freddy’s hat, from the first teaser on Scott's website for FNAF 4. Then it repeats and repeats, each time ending in the FNAF 3 horror attraction burning down. It's almost like the FNAF pizzerias and the horror attraction is in another universe, repeating itself each time. Well, I guess with the infinite possibilities of the the universe, anything can happen. Especially one where electric doors zoom up when the electricity goes out. Oh well. That's just a theory. A FORUM'S THEORY! THANKS FOR READING!

kittykat_005 wrote:

charlesdog wrote:

sunmount wrote:
I agree, it's very likely. AND IT BETTER DARN BE TRUE OR SCOTT WILL MYSTERIOUSLY DIE IN A FIRE

You mean this?

omg favorite song.









lol here is another link to another song that I love

oh and another song


and i like this

this is flippin' hilarious




















ha

when green flag clicked
broadcast [WAFFLEZ v]

when I receive [WAFFLEZ v]
say [WAFFLEZ? OH MY GOSH!!!!!!!!!]

charlesdog wrote:

LOOK AT THOSE POSTS!!

kittykat_005 wrote:

charlesdog wrote:

LOOK AT THOSE POSTS!!

How did you find that out?

charlesdog wrote:

kittykat_005 wrote:

charlesdog wrote:

sunmount wrote:
I agree, it's very likely. AND IT BETTER DARN BE TRUE OR SCOTT WILL MYSTERIOUSLY DIE IN A FIRE

You mean this?

omg favorite song.









lol here is another link to another song that I love

oh and another song


and i like this

this is flippin' hilarious




















ha

oh and this is good





oh m8 and this is like the best thing ever






Got any grapes?

charlesdog wrote:

hbrown0302 wrote:

danny61734 wrote:

hbrown0302 wrote:

charlesdog wrote:

Incase anyone is wondering what the bite of `83 was heres a pic:

I don't think Scott will just drop the bite of '83 onus when he is just trying to finish the story

why 83? isnt it 87?

exactly

sfranc8638 wrote:

http://i61.tinypic.com/2z7pr9w.jpg

johnt221 wrote:

The bite of 83' does not exist, and ‘Josh’ is still alive (see FNAF4 ending)