mybearworld wrote:

Is there an interpreter/compiler?

ajskateboarder wrote:

Is this made with ChatGPT?

TeenySpoon wrote:

How is “simple” and “esoteric” in the same phrase? Just wondering…

Google wrote:

es·o·ter·ic
adjective
intended for or likely to be understood by only a small number of people with a specialized knowledge or interest.
“esoteric philosophical debates”

Steve0Greatness wrote:

TeenySpoon wrote:

How is “simple” and “esoteric” in the same phrase? Just wondering…

Contrary to most beliefs, esoteric does not mean complicated.

Google wrote:

es·o·ter·ic
adjective
intended for or likely to be understood by only a small number of people with a specialized knowledge or interest.
“esoteric philosophical debates”

Esoteric Meaning
I believe you're misunderstanding of “esoteric” comes from most Esoteric Programming Languages(Esolangs) being overly-complicated like Malbolge(which apparently no human can make a program for) or Brain F.

However, in this case of the word esoteric, I believe OP(@i_eat_coffee) meant that it's not intended for very many people to use, and thus: it is esotoric.

• Put list indices through evaluateExpression so that a loop can use an array.
  
• A variable or list element x might be zero, so don't check its existence as !x.
  
• Fix “mul” and “div”: they both subtract instead of multiplying or dividing.
  
• Use Number() instead of parseInt() so that we can have non-whole numbers.
  

case "setArrValue":
  if (!arrays[tokens[1]]) render('Invalid array: ' + command, true);
  if (!(evaluateExpression(variables,tokens[2]) > 0)) render('Invalid array position: ' + command, true);
  arrays[tokens[1]][evaluateExpression(variables,tokens[2])-1] = evaluateExpression(variables, tokens.slice(3).join(' '));
  break;
case "getArrValue":
  if (!arrays[tokens[1]]) render('Invalid array: ' + command, true);
  if (!(evaluateExpression(variables,tokens[2]) > 0)) render('Invalid array position: ' + command, true);
  if (arrays[tokens[1]][evaluateExpression(variables,tokens[2])-1] === undefined) render('Invalid array value ' + command, true);
  variables.res = arrays[tokens[1]][evaluateExpression(variables,tokens[2])-1];
  break;

case "+":
  if (variables[tokens[1]] === undefined) render('Invalid variable: ' + command, true);
  if (variables[tokens[1]].toString() != '0' && !Number(variables[tokens[1]])) render('Variable must be a number: ' + command, true);
  variables[tokens[1]]++;
  break;
case "-":
  if (variables[tokens[1]] === undefined) render('Invalid variable: ' + command, true);
  if (variables[tokens[1]].toString() != '0' && !Number(variables[tokens[1]])) render('Variable must be a number: ' + command, true);
  variables[tokens[1]]--;
  break;

case "wait":
  if (Number(evaluateExpression(variables, tokens[1])) > 1 && Number(evaluateExpression(variables, tokens[1])) < 9) {
    await new Promise(r => setTimeout(r, evaluateExpression(variables, tokens[1]) * 1000));
  } else { render("Wait time must be between 1 to 9 seconds.", true); }
  break;

case "add":
  const add1 = evaluateExpression(variables, tokens[1]);
  const add2 = evaluateExpression(variables, tokens[2]);
  variables["res"] = Number(add1)+Number(add2);
  break;
case "sub":
  const sub1 = evaluateExpression(variables, tokens[1]);
  const sub2 = evaluateExpression(variables, tokens[2]);
  variables["res"] = Number(sub1)-Number(sub2);
  break;
case "mul":
  const mul1 = evaluateExpression(variables, tokens[1]);
  const mul2 = evaluateExpression(variables, tokens[2]);
  variables["res"] = Number(mul1)*Number(mul2);
  break;
case "div":
  const div1 = evaluateExpression(variables, tokens[1]);
  const div2 = evaluateExpression(variables, tokens[2]);
  variables["res"] = Number(div1)/Number(div2);
  break;

• resetting variables when “Run” is clicked, so that “defInCase” is more reliable
  
• allowing “write” to print zero
  
• letting “if” skip multiple lines: an optional extra parameter might be a number of lines to skip if the condition is false, or “{” to indicate if the condition is false, skip every command until finding the command “}”
  
• “setArrValueInCase”
  
• string operations like Scratch's length of () and letter () of ()
  

gilbert_given_189 wrote:

Something about this language seems familiar to me…

DifferentDance8 wrote:

gilbert_given_189 wrote:

Something about this language seems familiar to me…

What seems familiar about this language?

mlcreater wrote:

…

• resetting variables when “Run” is clicked, so that “defInCase” is more reliable
  

…

mlcreater wrote:

string operations like Scratch's length of () and letter () of ()

gilbert_given_189 wrote:

Something about this language seems familiar to me…

i_eat_coffee wrote:

mlcreater wrote:

…

• resetting variables when “Run” is clicked, so that “defInCase” is more reliable
  

…

That would make “defInCase” just useless, since it would act just like “def”. I made the command defInCase specially for loops so that users can set starting variables with ease while working with loops.

i_eat_coffee wrote:

INTERPRETER IS HERE: [REDACTED]

Steve0Greatness wrote:

i_eat_coffee wrote:

INTERPRETER IS HERE: [REDACTED]

Why did you redact it?

DifferentDance8 wrote:

Maybe you should add a "[string1] contains [string2]" condition to the if command? Helps with making chatbots.