## Discuss Scratch

- Alberknyis
- Scratcher

1000+ posts

### Work-arounds

Um, actually - that block is not very simple to workaround:if <> then ::cstart

elif <> then ::celse

else ::celse

endif <> then#editorlag

else

if <> then

else

if <> then

else

if <> then

else

if <> then

else

if <> then

else

if <> then

else

if <> then

else

if <> then

else

if <> then

else

if <> then

else

if <> then

else

if <> then

else

if <> then

else

end

end

end

end

end

end

end

end

end

end

end

end

end

end

Ummm… You mean this?

if <> then

else

if <> then

else

end

end

Because, y'know… I don't understand what you need 14 if-else blocks for.

Were you talking about having to work around this sort of thing?

if <> then

elif <>::celse

elif <>::celse

elif <>::celse

elif <>::celse

elif <>::celse

else

end

Because honestly I'm fine without an elif block. I do if-else-ception all the time.

stop [all v] ::stack

- ev3commander
- Scratcher

500+ posts

### Work-arounds

Workaround for forever:

define Forever move (number) steps

move (number) steps

Forever move (number) steps :: more blocks

- Alberknyis
- Scratcher

1000+ posts

### Work-arounds

else if not elif.guys it's called

Welcome to Python. Here we have our own names for things.

*Last edited by Alberknyis (Jan. 20, 2015 10:05:52)*

stop [all v] ::stack

- zorket
- Scratcher

500+ posts

### Work-arounds

These blocks are included in scratch because they are the BASE of what makes up everything else. The fact that in some block definitions you included other blocks in your workaround that are defined elsewhere proves it. With these blocks, more workarounds are possible, and as Iditaroid said, it is intuitive.

By the way, what's the suggestion here?

By the way, what's the suggestion here?

Try out my new strategy/luck game: Battleship!

- ChocolatePi
- Scratcher

1000+ posts

### Work-arounds

in better programming languages, else if is treated likeelse if not elif.guys it's called

Welcome to Python. Here we have our own names for things.

if ...

else

if ...

else

if...

- Alberknyis
- Scratcher

1000+ posts

### Work-arounds

in better programming languages, else if is treated likeelse if not elif.guys it's called

Welcome to Python. Here we have our own names for things.if ...

else

if ...

else

if...

In Python, we still call it elif.

stop [all v] ::stack

- peppermintpatty5
- Scratcher

1000+ posts

### Work-arounds

How wierd. :/ (And it seems Python is an older language than Java.)in better programming languages, else if is treated likeelse if not elif.guys it's called

Welcome to Python. Here we have our own names for things.if ...

else

if ...

else

if...

In Python, we still call it elif.

Scratch that. Python is soooo inferior

*Last edited by peppermintpatty5 (July 29, 2015 12:44:42)*

- CodeLegend
- Scratcher

500+ posts

### Work-arounds

not mean it is magically going to be faster than its workaround.the number of blocks is not what determines the computing speed. it is actually the behind-the-scenes operations. just because you have abstracted a function as a single block does

a large number of blocks can take down FPS, but only if you have failed to use “run without screen refresh”.

But it often will be faster, not because of magic, but because there are actually less behind-the-scenes operations when a function is written in native actionscript rather than scratch blocks.

A workaround has to be interpreted block-by-block by the scratch editor, while pure actionscript code can just be interpreted by the flash player.

Example:

polygon x:[list of x points v] y:[list of y points v]::pen

//would be much much faster than

define I didn't make this but it is a real script that has been used in many projects.

set [minHeight v] to (item (1 v) of [polyY v])

set [maxHeight v] to (item (1 v) of [polyY v])

pen up

set [i v] to [0]

repeat (vertices)

change [i v] by (1)

set [j v] to (item (i) of [polyY v])

if <(j) < (minHeight)> then

set [minHeight v] to (j)

end

if <(j) > (maxHeight)> then

set [maxHeight v] to (j)

end

end

set [pixelY v] to (minHeight)

repeat ((maxHeight) - (pixelY))

delete (all v) of [nodeX v]

set [i v] to [1]

set [j v] to (vertices)

repeat (vertices)

if <<<(item (i) of [polyY v]) < (pixelY)> and <not <(item (j) of [polyY v]) < (pixelY)>>> or <<(item (j) of [polyY v]) < (pixelY)> and <not <(item (i) of [polyY v]) < (pixelY)>>>> then

add (round ((item (i) of [polyX v]) + ((((pixelY) - (item (i) of [polyY v])) / ((item (j) of [polyY v]) - (item (i) of [polyY v]))) * ((item (j) of [polyX v]) - (item (i) of [polyX v]))))) to [nodeX v]

end

set [j v] to (i)

change [i v] by (1)

end

set [i v] to [1]

repeat until <not <(i) < (length of [nodeX v])>>

if <(item (i) of [nodeX v]) > (item ((i) + (1)) of [nodeX v])> then

set [swap v] to (item (i) of [nodeX v])

replace item (i) of [nodeX v] with (item ((i) + (1)) of [nodeX v])

replace item ((i) + (1)) of [nodeX v] with (swap)

if <(i) > [1]> then

change [i v] by (-1)

end

else

change [i v] by (1)

end

end

set [i v] to [1]

set pen size to (pen size)

repeat ((length of [nodeX v]) / (2))

go to x:(item (i) of [nodeX v]) y:(pixelY)

pen down

go to x:(item ((i) + (1)) of [nodeX v]) y:(pixelY)

pen up

change [i v] by (2)

end

change [pixelY v] by (pen size)

end

set pen color to [#000008]

repeat ((vertices) + (1))

change [i v] by (1)

go to x:(item (((i) mod (vertices)) + (1)) of [polyX v]) y:(item (((i) mod (vertices)) + (1)) of [polyY v])

pen down

end

- Blank1234
- Scratcher

500+ posts

### Work-arounds

better progrqmming languages have no loopselse if not elif.guys it's called

Welcome to Python. Here we have our own names for things.if ...

else

if ...

else

if...

Did you know that “kaj” means “and” in Esperanto?

Totally not for SEO:

https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/85467306/

https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/83099266/

https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/81628056/

https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/81562288/

https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/81462110/

https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/81436112/

https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/78896920/

https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/78863998/

https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/76577776/

https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/76459270/

https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/74797364/

https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/74085188/

https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/73150274/

https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/73112658/

https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/72484040/

https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/72737486/

https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/72410420/

https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/72378152/

https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/71910314/

https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/67826618/

https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/67882676/

https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/66909070/

https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/66925858/

https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/66420350/

https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/66062314/

https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/65564542/

https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/64828196/

https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/64286296/

https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/64283600/

https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/62386850/

https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/63907584/

https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/62785306/

https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/63767660/

https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/62676562/

https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/61948978/

https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/62521426/

https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/61074988/

https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/11658256/

https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/60640274/

- peppermintpatty5
- Scratcher

1000+ posts

### Work-arounds

wut? WUT?better progrqmming languages have no loopselse if not elif.guys it's called

Welcome to Python. Here we have our own names for things.if ...

else

if ...

else

if...

*Last edited by peppermintpatty5 (July 29, 2015 21:51:20)*

- DaBombPop1
- Scratcher

4 posts

### Work-arounds

too bad you cannot move variables

*Last edited by DaBombPop1 (July 6, 2016 20:20:17)*

- Sheep_maker
- Scratcher

1000+ posts

### Work-arounds

The ST is busy, so they want to do as less as possible to still benefit Scratch. Removing all the workaroundable blocks would waste the ST's time and won't benefit anyone. Adding blocks take time and effort, and many times if there's a workaround, the ST won't do it because it's already possible. Blocks without workarounds, however, extend what's possible with Scratch.

I think that's why

I think that's why

- Sheep_maker This is a kumquat-free signature. :P

What's happening? This is my signature; it appears below all my posts. Discuss it on my profile, not the forums.

To make your own, click “Change your signature” at the bottom of the discussion home page.

<key (join [enter] []) pressed?> // This works now.postsignature { overflow: auto; } .scratchblocks { overflow-x: auto; overflow-y: hidden; }