I think this would be a good block, if you had like fifty sprites, you wouldn't want to broadcast something and then in every single sprite say:

when green flag clicked
stop [all other scripts in sprite v]

That would be a whole lot of effort just to do that, so I hope this gets submitted

natdilt wrote:

> if you had like fifty sprites, you wouldn't want to broadcast something and then in every single sprite say:

I mean, you'd have to use 50 blocks anyway, right?

wendiner wrote:

natdilt wrote:

> if you had like fifty sprites, you wouldn't want to broadcast something and then in every single sprite say:

I mean, you'd have to use 50 blocks anyway, right?

101. 50 for receiving broadcast, 50 for stop all other scripts in sprite, and 1 to broadcast.

is there something I'm missing here?

-Valtren- wrote:

is there something I'm missing here?
-snip-

I think that they worded it wrong. What they mean is “stop all scripts in other sprites”

musicROCKS013 wrote:

-Valtren- wrote:

is there something I'm missing here?
-snip-

I think that they worded it wrong. What they mean is “stop all scripts in other sprites”

but then wouldn't that make it a dupe?

-Valtren- wrote:

but then wouldn't that make it a dupe?

No. All other scripts in the sprite running this code will still run.

musicROCKS013 wrote:

-Valtren- wrote:

but then wouldn't that make it a dupe?

No. All other scripts in the sprite running this code will still run.

You've got it. It's almost a dupe, but not quite. The rest of the scripts in the sprite still work but all of the others are stopped.

This wouldn't be a cap block btw. And if you want the the one in the forum as mentioned in:

-Valtren- wrote:

musicROCKS013 wrote:

-Valtren- wrote:

is there something I'm missing here?
-snip-

I think that they worded it wrong. What they mean is “stop all scripts in other sprites”

but then wouldn't that make it a dupe?

, then you could just add:

 stop [all other scripts in sprite v] 

bump

tell [all other sprites v] to {
stop [all other scripts in sprite v]
} :: control

Wouldn't this be more useful?

SciPiDilts wrote:

tell [all other sprites v] to {
stop [all other scripts in sprite v]
} :: control

Wouldn't this be more useful?

Idk I honestly think that that was talked about already…

I still think they could interpret it into the

 stop [all v] 

, an existing block, which might be less work