New - [ask with options and wait]

soarroying

ask [] with options [] [] @delInput @addInput and wait :: sensing //Due to the text you know what is does don't you?

Last edited by Paddle2See (May 9, 2022 12:05:52)

AIGamesDeveloper

May I please have an example of the New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New block so I know how this works?

Prime689

soarroying wrote:
-snip-

But the boolean already defined if answer = 2, so there is no need for the options feature.

sharkode

Prime689 wrote:
(#5)
soarroying wrote:
-snip-
But the boolean already defined if answer = 2, so there is no need for the options feature.

Yes there is, because instead of this…

What is 1+1?
(text box)

you have this:

What is 1+1?
1
2

Last edited by sharkode (May 8, 2022 01:18:32)

SciPiDilts

Um, wouldn't it make more sense to use a list as the input?

ask [] using [list v] as options and wait :: sensing

historical_supa

SciPiDilts wrote:
Um, wouldn't it make more sense to use a list as the input?
ask [] using [list v] as options and wait :: sensing

That would be inconvenient, since you'd have to create some lists.

SciPiDilts

historical_supa wrote:
SciPiDilts wrote:
Um, wouldn't it make more sense to use a list as the input?
ask [] using [list v] as options and wait :: sensing
That would be inconvenient, since you'd have to create some lists.

Point, though there are some cases where the list option would be more convenient (such as having text options), so having both would make the most sense, I guess.

TheTrillion

New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New is a duplicate. To check for duplicates, you can use Ocular.

TheSmartGuy1234

Prime689 wrote:
soarroying wrote:
-snip-
But the boolean already defined if answer = 2, so there is no need for the options feature.

They want to make sure they don't type in something like 3.

DinoMaster20

How would this look to the viewer?

musicROCKS013

Another question: what if you want there to be more than one answer? Is that what those “<“ “>” arrows are for?

historical_supa

musicROCKS013 wrote:
Another question: what if you want there to be more than one answer? Is that what those “<“ “>” arrows are for?

Yes

Paddle2See

TheTrillion wrote:
New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New is a duplicate. To check for duplicates, you can use Ocular.

That one appears to be multiple suggestions - and it has very little detail or discussion. I think we'll stick with this one, thanks.

soarroying

Paddle2See wrote:
TheTrillion wrote:
New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New is a duplicate. To check for duplicates, you can use Oakular.
That one appears to be multiple suggestions - and it has very little detail or discussion. I think we'll stick with this one, thanks.

Phew!

Last edited by soarroying (May 9, 2022 10:43:14)

soarroying

SciPiDilts wrote:
historical_supa wrote:
SciPiDilts wrote:
Um, wouldn't it make more sense to use a list as the input?
ask [] using [list v] as options and wait :: sensing
That would be inconvenient, since you'd have to create some lists.
Point, though there are some cases where the list option would be more convenient (such as having text options), so having both would make the most sense, I guess.

And, it would look like this:

ask [] using [list v] as options and wait :: list

TheAnimalKingdom42

What would this look like in action? Would there still be a box to enter text? If so, could you still write anything? Would it keep asking until you answered one of the options? In this block, I see no need for the answer box, and instead the need for a panel that contains clickable options.
Also, please don't create those spammy titles, it is much easier for the rest of us when the title of your suggestion tells us what you are suggesting, and without 39 “new's”.

Gato_Amigo111

AIGamesDeveloper wrote:
May I please have an example of the New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New New block so I know how this works?

Yeah, what is this suggestion, anyway?

soarroying

TheAnimalKingdom42 wrote:
What would this look like in action? Would there still be a box to enter text? If so, could you still write anything? Would it keep asking until you answered one of the options? In this block, I see no need for the answer box, and instead the need for a panel that contains clickable options.
Also, please don't create those spammy titles, it is much easier for the rest of us when the title of your suggestion tells us what you are suggesting, and without 39 “new's”.

But I like making spammy titles

Last edited by soarroying (May 9, 2022 11:53:15)

TheAnimalKingdom42

removed

Last edited by TheAnimalKingdom42 (May 9, 2022 11:54:13)

TheAnimalKingdom42

soarroying wrote:
TheAnimalKingdom42 wrote:
What would this look like in action? Would there still be a box to enter text? If so, could you still write anything? Would it keep asking until you answered one of the options? In this block, I see no need for the answer box, and instead the need for a panel that contains clickable options.
Also, please don't create those spammy titles, it is much easier for the rest of us when the title of your suggestion tells us what you are suggesting, and without 39 “new's”.
But I like making spammy titles

It is irritating, and it tells us nothing about your suggestion. It draws negative attention, the Scratch Team likes neat and descriptive titles.

Discuss Scratch