pokepowerd-eevee wrote:

NANI FLASH?!

HelloLanguage wrote:

pokepowerd-eevee wrote:

NANI FLASH?!

Yes, Flash! Did you try it?

kccuber wrote:

you need to update your browser if it still allows Flash player.

HelloLanguage wrote:

on the browser you chose! (I chose IE)

Chiroyce wrote:

HelloLanguage wrote:

on the browser you chose! (I chose IE)

they chose IE in the first place, thats why.

HelloLanguage wrote:

Chiroyce wrote:

HelloLanguage wrote:

on the browser you chose! (I chose IE)

they chose IE in the first place, thats why.

I chose IE because i dont have Chrome version >83 or Firefox/Waterfox

HelloLanguage wrote:

(#6)

Chiroyce wrote:

HelloLanguage wrote:

on the browser you chose! (I chose IE)

they chose IE in the first place, thats why.

I chose IE because i dont have Chrome version >83 or Firefox/Waterfox

dhuls wrote:

HelloLanguage wrote:

(#6)

Chiroyce wrote:

HelloLanguage wrote:

on the browser you chose! (I chose IE)

they chose IE in the first place, thats why.

I chose IE because i dont have Chrome version >83 or Firefox/Waterfox

How about you download a browser that still gets updates, like this, or this, or even this.

god286 wrote:

(#9)

dhuls wrote:

HelloLanguage wrote:

(#6)

Chiroyce wrote:

HelloLanguage wrote:

on the browser you chose! (I chose IE)

they chose IE in the first place, thats why.

I chose IE because i dont have Chrome version >83 or Firefox/Waterfox

How about you download a browser that still gets updates, like this, or this, or even this.

because of flash!

working online

NanoRook wrote:

Genuinely do not understand the amount of “how to use 2.0 online again” posts in here lately. It's feasible but horrendously impractical.

First of all, the 2.0 offline editor exists, and it functions identically to the old online 2.0 editor.

Secondly, the only way you could feasibly use 2.0 online again (assuming Scratch still hosted it, which they don't) you would have to contend with using an old browser that still supports an older version of Flash that doesn't have the killswitch code that the last few versions of Flash had, which means you have to use a very old, unstable, vulnerable browser (like IE6) that has an equally old and vulnerable version of Flash support. That's not to mention that you can no longer officially download Flash.

And maybe you want to go through all that trouble, but is it really worth it when the offline editor is still perfectly functional?

NanoRook wrote:

Genuinely do not understand the amount of “how to use 2.0 online again” posts in here lately. It’s feasible but horrendously impractical.

HelloLanguage wrote:

NanoRook wrote:

Genuinely do not understand the amount of “how to use 2.0 online again” posts in here lately. It's feasible but horrendously impractical.

First of all, the 2.0 offline editor exists, and it functions identically to the old online 2.0 editor.

Secondly, the only way you could feasibly use 2.0 online again (assuming Scratch still hosted it, which they don't) you would have to contend with using an old browser that still supports an older version of Flash that doesn't have the killswitch code that the last few versions of Flash had, which means you have to use a very old, unstable, vulnerable browser (like IE6) that has an equally old and vulnerable version of Flash support. That's not to mention that you can no longer officially download Flash.

And maybe you want to go through all that trouble, but is it really worth it when the offline editor is still perfectly functional?

You know people that want to save MEMORY??

HelloLanguage wrote:

(#14)

HelloLanguage wrote:

NanoRook wrote:

Genuinely do not understand the amount of “how to use 2.0 online again” posts in here lately. It's feasible but horrendously impractical.

First of all, the 2.0 offline editor exists, and it functions identically to the old online 2.0 editor.

Secondly, the only way you could feasibly use 2.0 online again (assuming Scratch still hosted it, which they don't) you would have to contend with using an old browser that still supports an older version of Flash that doesn't have the killswitch code that the last few versions of Flash had, which means you have to use a very old, unstable, vulnerable browser (like IE6) that has an equally old and vulnerable version of Flash support. That's not to mention that you can no longer officially download Flash.

And maybe you want to go through all that trouble, but is it really worth it when the offline editor is still perfectly functional?

You know people that want to save MEMORY??

Oh yes, people on iOS?!

HelloLanguage wrote:

1st of all, No custom blocks.

HelloLanguage wrote:

You know people that want to save MEMORY??

dhuls wrote:

People on iOS can't even use Flash via the browser. Ever heard of Steve Jobs's "Thoughts on Flash" letter?

HelloLanguage wrote:

P U F F I N W E B B R O W S E R

Chiroyce wrote:

HelloLanguage wrote:

P U F F I N W E B B R O W S E R

HelloLanguage wrote:

NanoRook wrote:

Genuinely do not understand the amount of “how to use 2.0 online again” posts in here lately. It's feasible but horrendously impractical.

First of all, the 2.0 offline editor exists, and it functions identically to the old online 2.0 editor.

Secondly, the only way you could feasibly use 2.0 online again (assuming Scratch still hosted it, which they don't) you would have to contend with using an old browser that still supports an older version of Flash that doesn't have the killswitch code that the last few versions of Flash had, which means you have to use a very old, unstable, vulnerable browser (like IE6) that has an equally old and vulnerable version of Flash support. That's not to mention that you can no longer officially download Flash.

And maybe you want to go through all that trouble, but is it really worth it when the offline editor is still perfectly functional?

You know people that want to save MEMORY??

HelloLanguage wrote:

Chiroyce wrote:

HelloLanguage wrote:

P U F F I N W E B B R O W S E R

Ok. But it still allows Adobe Flash Player.

NanoRook wrote:

HelloLanguage wrote:

Chiroyce wrote:

HelloLanguage wrote:

P U F F I N W E B B R O W S E R

Ok. But it still allows Adobe Flash Player.

Show me Puffin running with Adobe Flash Player.