Every time someone posts a link in the forums, it leads you to the site, but on the same page. This is not too good because you can't check it out and discuss it at the same time. So I think that all links in the forums should have a or target function. What this function does is it sends you to the website, but on a different tab. There would be an option asking if you want it to be targetted or not.
Reasons to support:
- “I open links but it opens on the same tab. So I need to find the post again”
- “I've always just right-clicked stuff and I'd rather do this instead of using the ”open link in new tab“”

support. this could be useful so people dont always have to right click links. i think it should be an option though

when green flag clicked
add [Marc92020] to [List of Scratchers v]
repeat until <I leave Scratch :: operators>
show
think [Should I Scratch?]
set (answer) to [Yes]
broadcast [KEEP SCRATCHING!!! v]
end
stop [this signature v]

Marc92020 wrote:

support. this could be useful so people dont always have to right click links. i think it should be an option though

Okay, I will update the OP. So like right after Scratch asks for the link?

I_LOVE_TO_MAKE_STUFF wrote:

Marc92020 wrote:

support. this could be useful so people dont always have to right click links. i think it should be an option though

Okay, I will update the OP. So like right after Scratch asks for the link?

that wasnt what i meant but yeah, that would be good

when green flag clicked
add [Marc92020] to [List of Scratchers v]
repeat until <I leave Scratch :: operators>
show
think [Should I Scratch?]
set (answer) to [Yes]
broadcast [KEEP SCRATCHING!!! v]
end
stop [this signature v]

<removed>

Support! I open links but it opens on the same tab. So I need to find the post again

Scratch On!

bump (3rd page)

Bump, 3rd paged

Support, I've always just right clicked stuff and I'd rather this instead of using the “open link in new tab”

Bump

Wow, second paged really quick. Bump

i mean like you can use ctrl + click , support anyways , but wouldn't that fill up the window real quick?

dave-alt-4 wrote:

but wouldn't that fill up the window real quick?

no?

dave-alt-4 wrote:

i mean like you can use ctrl + click , support anyways , but wouldn't that fill up the window real quick?

Nah, only 1 tab

Bump, 3rd page

Bump

bump

I just do a three-tap by habit on my keyboard to open most links, so I don't really see this affecting me or most users very much.

Support

when green flag clicked
forever
write code
repeat until <(bugs) = [0]>
test
fix bugs
end
release
end

kkidslogin wrote:

Support

kkidslogin wrote:

DO YOU USE THE SUPPORT CONVENTION?
Think! Is saying if you support a suggestion necessary? No! People can just tell by your constructive post after it. You have more freedom on your tone!

Please be constructive.