Magnifier - Scratch comment reactions and probably something else

PATSATDAT

potatophant wrote:
why is that your idea of fun

because they are smart

my site

potatophant

magnifier received 21 new registered users on thursday alone. i'm excited to see how this turns out.

9pfs

potatophant wrote:
magnifier received 21 new registered users on thursday alone. i'm excited to see how this turns out.

ETA for SA integration, PR number if applicable?

Update to Chrome 98 immediately More info
Share

topic/571765 MUST be apologized for.
Turns out, it was!!!

CST1229

9pfs wrote:
(#1063)
potatophant wrote:
magnifier received 21 new registered users on thursday alone. i'm excited to see how this turns out.
ETA for SA integration, PR number if applicable?

w_l rejected because it apparently is useless and should be enabled by default when more people use magnifier iirc

This is a signature. It's text that appears below each post I write. Click here to learn more. And use Shift+Down to see more if you're on Chrome.

Even bigger bruh moment than the last time
my favorite coding website in which sharing code, extensions or websites written with code isn't allowed (credit to jeffalo and chiroyce)

Stuff I made
Project Explorer
note: not a file converter

potatophant

CST1229 wrote:
9pfs wrote:
(#1063)
potatophant wrote:
magnifier received 21 new registered users on thursday alone. i'm excited to see how this turns out.
ETA for SA integration, PR number if applicable?
w_l rejected because it apparently is useless and should be enabled by default when more people use magnifier iirc

i believe its still open for discussion but i'd rather wait. current user count is 351 but has started to grow exponentially in the last week or so.

Last edited by potatophant (Jan. 16, 2022 10:05:02)

potatophant

501 users celebration

i was asleep when the 500th user joined.

Chiroyce

petition to make a petition to add magnifier to SA - react to this post on oculah

looks like worldlanguages hacked ocular to prevent this petition - uh oh /j

Last edited by Chiroyce (March 15, 2022 14:19:28)

April Fools' topics:

— New Buildings in Scratch's headquarters
— Give every Scratcher an M1 MacBook Air
— Scratch should let users edit other Scratchers' projects
— Make a statue for Jeffalo
— Scratch Tech Tips™
— Make a Chiroyce statue emoji

<img src=“x” onerror=“alert('XSS vulnerability discovered')”>

this is a test sentence

brooc210

I think you add the feature to insert a specific comment id so that you can easily star it or react to it.

http://web.roblox.com

what u doing here? go make a new project!

DON'T click here

potatophant

brooc210 wrote:
I think you add the feature to insert a specific comment id so that you can easily star it or react to it.

the scratch api doesn't give an easy way of viewing a comment from its id. if I were to do that then you would be able to react to it but you wouldn't actually see it. bored people will type in any number and spam reactions with minimal effort. (starring a comment requires the contents of the comment).

if for some reason the api does let you do this (unlikely) then I will consider.

Maximouse

potatophant wrote:
if for some reason the api does let you do this (unlikely) then I will consider.

I think just using an arbitrary project or studio ID when requesting a comment used to work but it appears to be fixed.

This is Maximouse's signature. Learn more about signatures.

brooc210

potatophant wrote:
(#1069)
brooc210 wrote:
I think you add the feature to insert a specific comment id so that you can easily star it or react to it.
the scratch api doesn't give an easy way of viewing a comment from its id. if I were to do that then you would be able to react to it but you wouldn't actually see it. bored people will type in any number and spam reactions with minimal effort. (starring a comment requires the contents of the comment).

if for some reason the api does let you do this (unlikely) then I will consider.

But it works with projects, profiles, studios, topics and posts (the last 2 from ocular) so why not with comments?

http://web.roblox.com

what u doing here? go make a new project!

DON'T click here

potatophant

brooc210 wrote:
potatophant wrote:
(#1069)
brooc210 wrote:
I think you add the feature to insert a specific comment id so that you can easily star it or react to it.
the scratch api doesn't give an easy way of viewing a comment from its id. if I were to do that then you would be able to react to it but you wouldn't actually see it. bored people will type in any number and spam reactions with minimal effort. (starring a comment requires the contents of the comment).

if for some reason the api does let you do this (unlikely) then I will consider.
But it works with projects, profiles, studios, topics and posts (the last 2 from ocular) so why not with comments?

because comments are not projects, profiles, studios, topics, or posts (i believe you can't get a profile from their user id either).

brooc210

potatophant wrote:
(#1072)
brooc210 wrote:
potatophant wrote:
(#1069)
brooc210 wrote:
I think you add the feature to insert a specific comment id so that you can easily star it or react to it.
the scratch api doesn't give an easy way of viewing a comment from its id. if I were to do that then you would be able to react to it but you wouldn't actually see it. bored people will type in any number and spam reactions with minimal effort. (starring a comment requires the contents of the comment).

if for some reason the api does let you do this (unlikely) then I will consider.
But it works with projects, profiles, studios, topics and posts (the last 2 from ocular) so why not with comments?
because comments are not projects, profiles, studios, topics, or posts (i believe you can't get a profile from their user id either).

Ok.

http://web.roblox.com

what u doing here? go make a new project!

DON'T click here

Discuss Scratch