The split reporter would need to report a list, which (list outputs) is not something in Scratch. This block would better belong in Snap! (in fact it's already a thing there), or it could just be a list block:

set [list v] to split text [] by [] :: list

Please don't make lists of suggestions; if you're throwing out multiple suggestions in a single thread then you probably didn't put that much thought into them, and it's better for discussion to give each idea its own thread.

the2000 wrote:

Please don't make lists of suggestions; if you're throwing out multiple suggestions in a single thread then you probably didn't put that much thought into them, and it's better for discussion to give each idea its own thread.

It is related

cruncherBones wrote:

the2000 wrote:

Please don't make lists of suggestions; if you're throwing out multiple suggestions in a single thread then you probably didn't put that much thought into them, and it's better for discussion to give each idea its own thread.

It is related

Not the same, though. The “uppercase” and “lowercase” blocks might be related, but just being in the same category as the split block wouldn't make them “related”.

the2000 wrote:

cruncherBones wrote:

the2000 wrote:

Please don't make lists of suggestions; if you're throwing out multiple suggestions in a single thread then you probably didn't put that much thought into them, and it's better for discussion to give each idea its own thread.

It is related

Not the same, though. The “uppercase” and “lowercase” blocks might be related, but just being in the same category as the split block wouldn't make them “related”.

They are both in operators thus related thus I am right and this thread should stay!!!

cruncherBones wrote:

the2000 wrote:

Not the same, though. The “uppercase” and “lowercase” blocks might be related, but just being in the same category as the split block wouldn't make them “related”.

They are both in operators thus related thus I am right and this thread should stay!!!

Is that a fdreerf funny I see? Again, being in the same category does not make them related. The camera blocks and the "touching color []" blocks were in the sensing category back in 2.0, but that doesn't mean that you could've suggested stuff for them together.

the2000 wrote:

cruncherBones wrote:

the2000 wrote:

Not the same, though. The “uppercase” and “lowercase” blocks might be related, but just being in the same category as the split block wouldn't make them “related”.

They are both in operators thus related thus I am right and this thread should stay!!!

Is that a fdreerf funny I see? Again, being in the same category does not make them related. The camera blocks and the "touching color []" blocks were in the sensing category back in 2.0, but that doesn't mean that you could've suggested stuff for them together.

They are related they are same category!

All blocks in the same category are related as they are the same colour


I did not get that from fdreerf I got it from Prime99

cruncherBones wrote:

the2000 wrote:

Is that a fdreerf funny I see? Again, being in the same category does not make them related. The camera blocks and the "touching color []" blocks were in the sensing category back in 2.0, but that doesn't mean that you could've suggested stuff for them together.

They are related they are same category!

All blocks in the same category are related as they are the same colour

I can't tell if you're being serious or sarcastic. Which are you?

the2000 wrote:

cruncherBones wrote:

the2000 wrote:

Is that a fdreerf funny I see? Again, being in the same category does not make them related. The camera blocks and the "touching color []" blocks were in the sensing category back in 2.0, but that doesn't mean that you could've suggested stuff for them together.

They are related they are same category!

All blocks in the same category are related as they are the same colour

I can't tell if you're being serious or sarcastic. Which are you?

Serious probably, as I agree. If they are in the same category they are related

dertermenter wrote:

the2000 wrote:

I can't tell if you're being serious or sarcastic. Which are you?

Serious probably, as I agree. If they are in the same category they are related

See my example in the earlier post. Would you seriously consider video sensing and the “touching color” boolean to be “related”? They were in the same category, you know….

the2000 wrote:

dertermenter wrote:

the2000 wrote:

I can't tell if you're being serious or sarcastic. Which are you?

Serious probably, as I agree. If they are in the same category they are related

See my example in the earlier post. Would you seriously consider video sensing and the “touching color” boolean to be “related”? They were in the same category, you know….

True, what they do are different, so yeah, I now agree with you

I did put some thought into these blocks. I do like @CST1229's block idea. I think that makes more sense for 4.0.

I also put some work into making the blocks. I used scratchblocks.

The true block would look like

I believe the split block has been suggested here: https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/topic/26936

And the uppercase/lowercase one here: https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/topic/173757

Please use the existing threads here for discussion of these ideas.

In general, it is a good idea to separate different ideas that don't necessarily rely on one another into different threads, so that it's easier to organize things. However, let's not get too hung up on it, since as you can see here it's easy to spend more time arguing about it than actually discussing the idea. The forum rules are meant to let good discussion flourish - if enforcing them is getting in the way of that, then maybe it's a sign it's going too far.