Discuss Scratch
- Discussion Forums
- » Suggestions
- » The forever if block hasn't left us.. Should the ST remove this?
- marioman20
- Scratcher
43 posts
The forever if block hasn't left us.. Should the ST remove this?
wait a sec…THAT'S RIGHT!!!!!!You didn't add the bb code for the block? forever if <>
end
P.S. Please oh please don't remove it!!!
I have it!!
the forever if block only has one condition \|/
forever if <>but the workaround can have LOADS!!
end
forever
if <>
end
if <>
end
...
end
a
- goldfish678
- Scratcher
1000+ posts
The forever if block hasn't left us.. Should the ST remove this?
I believe I did not say that…. (gah, I just messed up the whole quote chain. Yaaaay.)Most likely because, you see, Why was the forever if block removed?
1:as you can see here, you could just do this:forever
if <> then
end
end
2: It's better because: it only repeats IF something is happening, like:when green flag clicked
forever
if <[(BowserDeath)] = [ yes]> then
play sound [BowserDeath v]
hide
end
end
And ps:forever
YOU ARE AWESOME!!!!
end
Last edited by goldfish678 (Sept. 7, 2014 11:00:40)
- BGMead
- Scratcher
1000+ posts
The forever if block hasn't left us.. Should the ST remove this?
CRAZY
Heyo! I am Jade (she/her) and I used to be very active on the scratch discussion forums back in 2017. I've since left scratch to pursue an interest in game development, graphics and engine programming, and college.
- jTron
- Scratcher
100+ posts
The forever if block hasn't left us.. Should the ST remove this?
I honestly don't understand what the fuss is about.
The official and best workaround for the foreverif block is
The official and best workaround for the foreverif block is
foreverScratchblocks has not removed foreverif because
if <criteria :: operators> then
// do stuff
end
end
- it remains useful for Scratchers using 1.4
- it doesn't hurt anyone to still have it around. (it's not using a huge amount of server space, etc. to maintain support for one block.)
- danielhal
- Scratcher
100+ posts
The forever if block hasn't left us.. Should the ST remove this?
Because you could just do Why was the forever if block removed?
forever
if <> then
...
end
end
- Epicness123
- Scratcher
1000+ posts
The forever if block hasn't left us.. Should the ST remove this?
You can simply just put the "if' block inside the forever block
Sadly, my kumquats were eaten by an evil forum signature.
- RPFluffy
- Scratcher
1000+ posts
The forever if block hasn't left us.. Should the ST remove this?
I honestly don't understand what the fuss is about.
The official and best workaround for the foreverif block isforeverScratchblocks has not removed foreverif because
if <criteria :: operators> then
// do stuff
end
end
- it remains useful for Scratchers using 1.4
- it doesn't hurt anyone to still have it around. (it's not using a huge amount of server space, etc. to maintain support for one block.)
OR, this though it isn't as good:
repeat until <not <>>// Just put the condition in the not
//and code here
end
Last edited by RPFluffy (Sept. 11, 2014 22:42:51)
Nothing Is EVER 100%, that is just an assumption.
Some important links: Here and here or need help click Here. Eats followers, Loves helping people.
My “..” and “…” are not spelling mistakes, it means that they are ways of telling someone that I can continue more about it and that the sentence isn't ended the best way. I like putting new indents and lines so I can split up what I am talking about.
Some important links: Here and here or need help click Here. Eats followers, Loves helping people. Check this MMO out! Kiwi = Support WHAT THAT'S IMPOSSIBLE: Through the drop down ;)if <> :: control cstart
else :: control
end
- stickfiregames
- Scratcher
1000+ posts
The forever if block hasn't left us.. Should the ST remove this?
- RPFluffy
- Scratcher
1000+ posts
The forever if block hasn't left us.. Should the ST remove this?
That's not “not as good”. It isn't a workaround at all. OR, this though it isn't as good:repeat until <not <>>// Just put the condition in the not
//and code here
end
Actually it is though it is not as reliable.
Yes this is still better, I know:
forever
if <> then
end
end
Nothing Is EVER 100%, that is just an assumption.
Some important links: Here and here or need help click Here. Eats followers, Loves helping people.
My “..” and “…” are not spelling mistakes, it means that they are ways of telling someone that I can continue more about it and that the sentence isn't ended the best way. I like putting new indents and lines so I can split up what I am talking about.
Some important links: Here and here or need help click Here. Eats followers, Loves helping people. Check this MMO out! Kiwi = Support WHAT THAT'S IMPOSSIBLE: Through the drop down ;)if <> :: control cstart
else :: control
end
- anythingispossible
- Scratcher
100+ posts
The forever if block hasn't left us.. Should the ST remove this?
forever if
end
(Just testing)
This signature is inside the stomach of Timmy the kumquat. If you can see it, then you are in there too.
- stickfiregames
- Scratcher
1000+ posts
The forever if block hasn't left us.. Should the ST remove this?
- OmnipotentPotato
- Scratcher
1000+ posts
The forever if block hasn't left us.. Should the ST remove this?
I'm still confused why this block ever existed. xD
- stickfiregames
- Scratcher
1000+ posts
The forever if block hasn't left us.. Should the ST remove this?
There was a I'm still confused why this block ever existed. xD
when <> is true :: control hatblock in a really early version of Scratch. It was buggy, so they made
when gf clicked :: control
forever if <>
end
- scratchww
- Scratcher
72 posts
The forever if block hasn't left us.. Should the ST remove this?
well it seems kinda silly when you can just to do
just saying
when green flag clicked
forever
if <> then
end
end
just saying
Sorry I forgot my signature at home
when green flag clicked
forever
Wonder [where I left my signature]
end
- supercreeper2005
- Scratcher
100+ posts
The forever if block hasn't left us.. Should the ST remove this?
No! You are getting it confused! It is
forevernot
if <>
end
end
if <> then
forever
end
end
Last edited by supercreeper2005 (Sept. 20, 2014 15:23:25)
Hello! I'm a scratcher who likes RPGs. Please view my rpg and try out this FNAF based game! Please favorite and Love my games and visit my profile! Also try out our featured project.
Want your Project featured? Click here!
If you are proud of your project, compete here.
Thanks to @austin360 for helping with the RPGs graphics
when I receive [a scratch account v]
imagine :: custom
program :: custom
share:: custom
when I receive <<[a favorite v]:: events > or <<[a follow v]:: events > or <<[a comment v]:: events > or <[a love v]:: events >> >>
say [Thanks!] for (2) secs
say [You wil get a love too!] for (2) secs
say [I will suggest this to followers!] for (2) secs
say [I'm actually serious! Check out the projects above!] for (2) secs
- Sparf
- Scratcher
100+ posts
The forever if block hasn't left us.. Should the ST remove this?
they removed it
- monstermash3
- Scratcher
1000+ posts
The forever if block hasn't left us.. Should the ST remove this?
Testing:
forever if <>It still works. I don't think they removed it yet.
end
stop scriptThose also work.
stop all
Last edited by monstermash3 (Dec. 8, 2015 23:35:02)
(Swallowed by an evil kumquat who was just taking a walk in the neighborhood of evil kumquats when they saw a garage sale where they bought a plate which they used to eat but they discovered that it leaked and they went to get their money back but the sale was over so they went in the house but the door was locked so they got their key but it didn't fit so they went home to use the key on the right door which was their own door and then they decided to swallow a signature for no reason.)
- -SuperScratch-
- Scratcher
100+ posts
The forever if block hasn't left us.. Should the ST remove this?
forever if <>
end
- Discussion Forums
- » Suggestions
- » The forever if block hasn't left us.. Should the ST remove this?