Discuss Scratch

DevanWolf
Scratcher
100+ posts

(round ()) block change

Hello, you should update this block:
(round())
into a function that is made like:
([round v]of()::operators)
because it look more better than the other one.

Last edited by DevanWolf (Aug. 15, 2014 15:30:59)


Online YouTube Poop Generator is Here! | SimTunes! | Bring Back Backdrop Scroll Blocks! | New Scratch Blocks! | Scratch Soundfont! | Important MIDI Converter!

Please check out those cool games that you will like! Click a game! Any game!
when(mouse y)>(150)
repeat until <(programmers::extension)>(150)>
delete this cap::control cap
end
delete this limit::control cap
Please help Scratch Team remove the 150px Signature Height Cap!
derpmeup
Scratcher
1000+ posts

(round ()) block change

No support, I think it looks fine already.

Last edited by derpmeup (July 25, 2014 21:14:26)


hey bro that's a pretty good meme xD!
DevanWolf
Scratcher
100+ posts

(round ()) block change

derpmeup wrote:

No support, I think it looks fine already.
Are you sure they gone remove the old round(number) block and turn into a function that uses (|round v| of (number))?

Online YouTube Poop Generator is Here! | SimTunes! | Bring Back Backdrop Scroll Blocks! | New Scratch Blocks! | Scratch Soundfont! | Important MIDI Converter!

Please check out those cool games that you will like! Click a game! Any game!
when(mouse y)>(150)
repeat until <(programmers::extension)>(150)>
delete this cap::control cap
end
delete this limit::control cap
Please help Scratch Team remove the 150px Signature Height Cap!
TheHockeyist
Scratcher
1000+ posts

(round ()) block change

No support. This would cause numerous scripts to stop working.


AonymousGuy
Scratcher
1000+ posts

(round ()) block change

DevanWolf wrote:

You should make this block:
(round())
into a function that is:
([round v]of()::operators)
because it look more better than the other one.
Yeah, but it sounds really weird - “round of x”.

If this were implemented, it would probably have to look more like this:
([sin of v] () :: operators) 
([cos of v] () :: operators)
([tan of v] () :: operators)
([abs of v] () :: operators)
//etc...
([round v] () :: operators)
which is just stranger…
DevanWolf
Scratcher
100+ posts

(round ()) block change

Check out the round of X released detector to see if it is there already or still not.

Online YouTube Poop Generator is Here! | SimTunes! | Bring Back Backdrop Scroll Blocks! | New Scratch Blocks! | Scratch Soundfont! | Important MIDI Converter!

Please check out those cool games that you will like! Click a game! Any game!
when(mouse y)>(150)
repeat until <(programmers::extension)>(150)>
delete this cap::control cap
end
delete this limit::control cap
Please help Scratch Team remove the 150px Signature Height Cap!
DevanWolf
Scratcher
100+ posts

(round ()) block change

when I receive[Is it released? v]
say(if<([round v] of (1)::operators)>(0)>then[YAY!!! IT'S FINALLY RELEASED!!! :D]else[No, It's Not Released! :(]::operators)
Random version of my crazy round detector

Online YouTube Poop Generator is Here! | SimTunes! | Bring Back Backdrop Scroll Blocks! | New Scratch Blocks! | Scratch Soundfont! | Important MIDI Converter!

Please check out those cool games that you will like! Click a game! Any game!
when(mouse y)>(150)
repeat until <(programmers::extension)>(150)>
delete this cap::control cap
end
delete this limit::control cap
Please help Scratch Team remove the 150px Signature Height Cap!
DevanWolf
Scratcher
100+ posts

(round ()) block change

*Bumps*

Online YouTube Poop Generator is Here! | SimTunes! | Bring Back Backdrop Scroll Blocks! | New Scratch Blocks! | Scratch Soundfont! | Important MIDI Converter!

Please check out those cool games that you will like! Click a game! Any game!
when(mouse y)>(150)
repeat until <(programmers::extension)>(150)>
delete this cap::control cap
end
delete this limit::control cap
Please help Scratch Team remove the 150px Signature Height Cap!
stickfiregames
Scratcher
1000+ posts

(round ()) block change

I would support this since it makes it easier to switch between the operator blocks.

To everyone saying that “round of” doesn't make sense, neither does “10^ of” because it would be read as “10 to the power of of”. Anyway that wouldn't stop the from making the block.










If you can read this, my signature cubeupload has been eaten by an evil kumquat!




or you just used Inspect Element, you hacker

;
HOWING
Scratcher
500+ posts

(round ()) block change

No support. And because it would look like this:
([round v] () :: operators // That would probably look weird
Or:
([round v] of (9) :: operators // That would just look strange
Original:
(round ())

Hockeyist wrote:

This would cause numerous scripts to stop working.

Last edited by HOWING (Aug. 17, 2014 17:10:01)


Check out my most popular game! Check out my cool apple catcher! Check out my awesome Bullet Bill Dodge!
AonymousGuy
Scratcher
1000+ posts

(round ()) block change

stickfiregames wrote:

I would support this since it makes it easier to switch between the operator blocks.

To everyone saying that “round of” doesn't make sense, neither does “10^ of” because it would be read as “10 to the power of of”. Anyway that wouldn't stop the from making the block.
But because ^ is a symbol, it's meaning is not directly read - I still read it “10 to the power of” because the of is simply not read when reading it like that.

But “round of” is much more obviously weird.
DevanWolf
Scratcher
100+ posts

(round ()) block change

stickfiregames wrote:

I would support this since it makes it easier to switch between the operator blocks.

To everyone saying that “round of” doesn't make sense, neither does “10^ of” because it would be read as “10 to the power of of”. Anyway that wouldn't stop the from making the block.
^-^

Online YouTube Poop Generator is Here! | SimTunes! | Bring Back Backdrop Scroll Blocks! | New Scratch Blocks! | Scratch Soundfont! | Important MIDI Converter!

Please check out those cool games that you will like! Click a game! Any game!
when(mouse y)>(150)
repeat until <(programmers::extension)>(150)>
delete this cap::control cap
end
delete this limit::control cap
Please help Scratch Team remove the 150px Signature Height Cap!
stickfiregames
Scratcher
1000+ posts

(round ()) block change

AonymousGuy wrote:

stickfiregames wrote:

I would support this since it makes it easier to switch between the operator blocks.

To everyone saying that “round of” doesn't make sense, neither does “10^ of” because it would be read as “10 to the power of of”. Anyway that wouldn't stop the from making the block.
But because ^ is a symbol, it's meaning is not directly read - I still read it “10 to the power of” because the of is simply not read when reading it like that.

But “round of” is much more obviously weird.

My point is that the exact reading of the block doesn't matter, because the meaning can still be understood.










If you can read this, my signature cubeupload has been eaten by an evil kumquat!




or you just used Inspect Element, you hacker

;
TimothyLawyer
Scratcher
1000+ posts

(round ()) block change

DevanWolf wrote:

because it look more better than the other one.
it looks less better than the current one

BeetleBlocks, WatercolorBot, and Turtle Art
Hover over a name or label to translate into current language
When Earth was… Purple?

☂️




Zro716
Scratcher
1000+ posts

(round ()) block change

your idea is actually plausible, although I wouldn't put round() with the rest of the special operators.

instead, I think we could take out floor() and ceiling() and put it in a dropdown with round(), like this:
([round v](1) ::operators)
([floor v](1) ::operators)
([ceiling v](1) ::operators)

so I half-support

As a long time Scratcher, I have found new meaning to the name “Scratch”: for me, it means to “scratch that itch”, to come back again and again to realize new ideas in this toy language, even when I'm capable of creating my projects in real programming languages years later. It's a friend that helped me to pursue programming and get me to enjoy its fruit. I'm certain many others who have walked this path as well have grown fond of its importance in their life.
Firedrake969
Scratcher
1000+ posts

(round ()) block change

Zro716 wrote:

your idea is actually plausible, although I wouldn't put round() with the rest of the special operators.

instead, I think we could take out floor() and ceiling() and put it in a dropdown with round(), like this:
([round v](1) ::operators)
([floor v](1) ::operators)
([ceiling v](1) ::operators)

so I half-support
Support

'17 rickoid

bf97b44a7fbd33db070f6ade2b7dc549
DevanWolf
Scratcher
100+ posts

(round ()) block change

TimothyLawyer wrote:

DevanWolf wrote:

because it look more better than the other one.
it looks less better than the current one
Really!? I want to make
(round())
in all in one block! So that I can usually switch between the round choice and each one with the dropdown instead of switching the blocks around.

Last edited by DevanWolf (Nov. 3, 2014 02:26:54)


Online YouTube Poop Generator is Here! | SimTunes! | Bring Back Backdrop Scroll Blocks! | New Scratch Blocks! | Scratch Soundfont! | Important MIDI Converter!

Please check out those cool games that you will like! Click a game! Any game!
when(mouse y)>(150)
repeat until <(programmers::extension)>(150)>
delete this cap::control cap
end
delete this limit::control cap
Please help Scratch Team remove the 150px Signature Height Cap!
HOWING
Scratcher
500+ posts

(round ()) block change

Didn't you reply to my answer? VV
No support. And because it would look like this:
([round v] () :: operators // That would probably look weird
Original:
(round ())

TheHockeyist wrote:

This would cause numerous scripts to stop working.

Check out my most popular game! Check out my cool apple catcher! Check out my awesome Bullet Bill Dodge!
stickfiregames
Scratcher
1000+ posts

(round ()) block change

Firedrake969 wrote:

Zro716 wrote:

your idea is actually plausible, although I wouldn't put round() with the rest of the special operators.

instead, I think we could take out floor() and ceiling() and put it in a dropdown with round(), like this:
([round v](1) ::operators)
([floor v](1) ::operators)
([ceiling v](1) ::operators)

so I half-support
Support

Actually this sounds like a better suggestion since it allows easier switching between the different rounding functions without having too many functions on one block.










If you can read this, my signature cubeupload has been eaten by an evil kumquat!




or you just used Inspect Element, you hacker

;
DevanWolf
Scratcher
100+ posts

(round ()) block change

HOWING wrote:

Didn't you reply to my answer? VV
No support. And because it would look like this:
([round v] () :: operators // That would probably look weird
Original:
(round ())

TheHockeyist wrote:

This would cause numerous scripts to stop working.
I don't know what you mean by replying your answer!?

Online YouTube Poop Generator is Here! | SimTunes! | Bring Back Backdrop Scroll Blocks! | New Scratch Blocks! | Scratch Soundfont! | Important MIDI Converter!

Please check out those cool games that you will like! Click a game! Any game!
when(mouse y)>(150)
repeat until <(programmers::extension)>(150)>
delete this cap::control cap
end
delete this limit::control cap
Please help Scratch Team remove the 150px Signature Height Cap!

Powered by DjangoBB