PkmnQ wrote:

gosoccerboy5 wrote:

Question: does the “do” script end then the “while doing” script ends? Or vice versa? Or they continue regardless of whether the other script has ended?

I think they'll continue, but the scripts ending when the other does might be useful if one of the scripts does nothing.

when gf clicked
broadcast [do stuff v] // "do"
... // "while doing"

dominic305 wrote:

Easy workaround:

when gf clicked
broadcast [do stuff v] // "do"
... // "while doing"

No support.

gosoccerboy5 wrote:

This is essentially the

launch {
script::motion
}::control

block from Snap!. It launches a script that runs while you run other scripts.
(Technically, it looks like

launch ({script::motion}::grey ring)::control

but Scratch isn't ready for grey rings)
So, no support. I'm going for a launch block.

when green flag clicked
say [yoyos are so coolllllll] for (2) secs
when green flag clicked
glide (pick random (1) to (10)) secs to x: (pick random (1) to (10)) y: (pick random (1) to (10))

NanoPIex wrote:

Can`t you make to seperate scripts?

Ex.

when green flag clicked
say [yoyos are so coolllllll] for (2) secs
when green flag clicked
glide (pick random (1) to (10)) secs to x: (pick random (1) to (10)) y: (pick random (1) to (10))

The title of this topic wrote:

FOR THE LOVE OF ALL THAT IS GOOD READ THE ENTIRE OP. I ASKED NICELY BEFORE BUT PEOPLE DON'T SEEM TO CARE. Bruh.

gosoccerboy5 wrote:

The title of this topic wrote:

FOR THE LOVE OF ALL THAT IS GOOD READ THE ENTIRE OP. I ASKED NICELY BEFORE BUT PEOPLE DON'T SEEM TO CARE. Bruh.

gosoccerboy5 wrote:

NanoPIex wrote:

Can`t you make to seperate scripts?

Ex.

when green flag clicked
say [yoyos are so coolllllll] for (2) secs
when green flag clicked
glide (pick random (1) to (10)) secs to x: (pick random (1) to (10)) y: (pick random (1) to (10))

Here's my reply.

The title of this topic wrote:

FOR THE LOVE OF ALL THAT IS GOOD READ THE ENTIRE OP. I ASKED NICELY BEFORE BUT PEOPLE DON'T SEEM TO CARE. Bruh.

Do {
add [1] to [list v]
add [2] to [list v]
add [3] to [list v]
add [4] to [list v]
add [5] to [list v]
} while doing {
add [5] to [list v]
add [4] to [list v]
add [3] to [list v]
add [2] to [list v]
add [1] to [list v]
} :: control

NanoPIex wrote:

gosoccerboy5 wrote:

-snip-

They did not make it clear why they don`t like two scripts. Therefore I can object.

xXRedTheCoderXx wrote:

But Red!, you may be asking, why can't you just use two scripts like this?

when green flag clicked
forever 
wait (5) secs
show
wait (5) secs
hide
end

when green flag clicked
forever 
next costume
end

Well, okay, sure, you could do that, but what about when you CAN'T do two scripts?
Yup! I'm talking about custom blocks!

define Jump

There are many times you'd need two scripts in a custom block, but it only lets you do one script, because you can't put multiple define hats of the same custom block! This would fix that.

define Jump
Do {
...
} while doing {
...
} :: control

This would also be useful for compacting scripts in general.

portalpower wrote:

I thought Js doesn't let you do that so the closest workaround is to make a custom block and check run without screen refresh and all of the scritpts will run very fast it's almost like they're running together, the downside is you can't put certain blocks in like the forever loop and wait until block

also since they it's not possible to make this do you mean like alternating?
ex:

Do {
add [1] to [list v]
add [2] to [list v]
add [3] to [list v]
add [4] to [list v]
add [5] to [list v]
} while doing {
add [5] to [list v]
add [4] to [list v]
add [3] to [list v]
add [2] to [list v]
add [1] to [list v]
} :: control

the list would be 1,5,2,4,3,3,4,2,5,1

NanoPIex wrote:

gosoccerboy5 wrote:

-snip-

They did not make it clear why they don`t like two scripts. Therefore I can object.

xXRedTheCoderXx wrote:

But Red!, you may be asking, why can't you just use two scripts like this?

when green flag clicked
forever 
wait (5) secs
show
wait (5) secs
hide
end

when green flag clicked
forever 
next costume
end

Well, okay, sure, you could do that, but what about when you CAN'T do two scripts?
Yup! I'm talking about custom blocks!

define Jump

There are many times you'd need two scripts in a custom block, but it only lets you do one script, because you can't put multiple define hats of the same custom block! This would fix that.

define Jump
Do {
...
} while doing {
...
} :: control

This would also be useful for compacting scripts in general.

NanoPIex wrote:

portalpower wrote:

-snip-

I`m not talking about custom blocks.

portalpower wrote:

NanoPIex wrote:

portalpower wrote:

-snip-

I`m not talking about custom blocks.

1. can you stop skimming over the posts for 2 seconds
2. do you know how to snip quotes

NanoPIex wrote:

portalpower wrote:

NanoPIex wrote:

portalpower wrote:

-snip-

I`m not talking about custom blocks.

1. can you stop skimming over the posts for 2 seconds
2. do you know how to snip quotes

1. I`m not.
2. Scratch does that for you.
3. Let`s not get off topic and disrespectful.

NanoPIex wrote:

gosoccerboy5 wrote:

The title of this topic wrote:

FOR THE LOVE OF ALL THAT IS GOOD READ THE ENTIRE OP. I ASKED NICELY BEFORE BUT PEOPLE DON'T SEEM TO CARE. Bruh.

Yeah, it`s harsh, but let`s not get off topic.

NanoPIex wrote:

-snip-
I`m not talking about custom blocks.

PkmnQ wrote:

NanoPIex wrote:

-snip-
I`m not talking about custom blocks.

I think you no like read. I will explain in few words. Normal hat block work with two scripts, but custom block no work with that. Do you get now?

Ok, that might've been kinda insulting. I'll use normal sentences.

Normal hat blocks work with two scripts, but custom blocks don't.

xXRedTheCoderXx wrote:

_ReykjaviK_ wrote:

There are ways around this, but yes support! It can be helpful! (´▽`ʃ♡ƪ)

Thanks! But, how are there ways around this?

{define block 1
forever
. . .
end

define block 2
forever
, , , :: grey
end

event :: events hat
broadcast [Execute Block v]

when I receive [Execute Block v]
block 1

when I receive [Execute Block v]
block 2} ⠀⠀⠀⠀= ⠀⠀⠀{event :: events hat
do {
. . .
} while doing {
, , , :: grey
} :: control} :: reporter #aaa