Hello there! I have a question: how to create fast split function?

Okay, firstly - my split function:


Is there a way to somehow improve this function, make it more compact?
The point is that the function splits the string into list items, and that there is a certain character which separates them

(i know that i can use “run without screen reflesh”, im already use it, but i search more compact function)

TheForceStudio wrote:

Hello there! I have a question: how to create fast split function?

Okay, firstly - my split function:


Is there a way to somehow improve this function, make it more compact?
The point is that the function splits the string into list items, and that there is a certain character which separates them

Hi, only a bit, but yes



Greetings.

Oumuamua wrote:

Hi, only a bit, but yes
-snip-
Greetings.

That cuts out the first half of the text

TheForceStudio wrote:

Is there a way to somehow improve this function, make it more compact?

Depends, do you want it more compact height wise, or total block count?

StrangeMagic32 wrote:

That cuts out the first half of the text

Yep. i tested it, but there was a space as first letter

Greetings.

EDIT: Just put this in a custom block set to ‘run without screen refresh’.
Yes, there is a way to do this you need four variables:

And one list:

This script will go through the “ValuetoSplit” And seperate it into parts which it will then add to the “Output” list. Hope this works!
Happy Scratching!

StrangeMagic32 wrote:

Depends, do you want it more compact height wise, or total block count?

I want it to be smaller in height, I think it would be prettier

Oumuamua wrote:

I think my code is better, because zero#k will be equal to the length of the text, and not 1 more. For me it is much more correct!

joshpinto6 wrote:

EDIT: Just put this in a custom block set to ‘run without screen refresh’.
Yes, there is a way to do this you need four variables:

And one list:

* code *

This script will go through the “ValuetoSplit” And seperate it into parts which it will then add to the “Output” list. Hope this works!
Happy Scratching!

Thank you, but I think the code has not become more compact, but rather - it has more variables (now there are 2 instead of 1), and it is even higher in height. But thanks for the way!

This is more compact (height wise), but it does have it's own problems once you try doing different lengths of strings
https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/383629453/

StrangeMagic32 wrote:

This is more compact (height wise), but it does have it's own problems once you try doing different lengths of strings
https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/383629453/

I fixed this error

Thank you all for your help, I close the topic (in a few hours, maybe someone will offer something else)!
I realized that this is the most optimal code.