Dinosaurguy77 wrote:

Block scratch should add: An If then repeat block.

medians wrote:

Dinosaurguy77 wrote:

Block scratch should add: An If then repeat block.

Well, how would that be different from the repeat until block?
Also, go to the Suggestions forum for that.

when green flag clicked

no context

1-_-1_GOD wrote:

That is super helpful. Thanks!

Dinosaurguy77 wrote:

medians wrote:

Dinosaurguy77 wrote:

Block scratch should add: An If then repeat block.

Well, how would that be different from the repeat until block?
Also, go to the Suggestions forum for that.

It would only do it if something. plus we won't waste blocks.

medians wrote:

Dinosaurguy77 wrote:

medians wrote:

Dinosaurguy77 wrote:

Block scratch should add: An If then repeat block.

Well, how would that be different from the repeat until block?
Also, go to the Suggestions forum for that.

It would only do it if something. plus we won't waste blocks.

The repeat until block does that then, unless I’m misunderstanding what you’re saying.

if <(HP) = [2]> then repeat until <not <(HP) = [2]>>
move (3) steps
end

when I receive [ v]
delete ((item (10) of [list variables] :: list) variable) of [list 1]

Dinosaurguy77 wrote:

Well I guess what I mean is that if let's say HP=2 then repeat until not HP=2.

if <(HP) = [2]> then repeat until <not <(HP) = [2]>>
move (3) steps
end

if <(HP) = [2]> then
repeat until <not <(HP) = [2]>>
move (3) steps
end
end

medians wrote:

Dinosaurguy77 wrote:

Well I guess what I mean is that if let's say HP=2 then repeat until not HP=2.

if <(HP) = [2]> then repeat until <not <(HP) = [2]>>
move (3) steps
end

So just repeat until not HP = 2, since it translates to:

if <(HP) = [2]> then
repeat until <not <(HP) = [2]>>
move (3) steps
end
end

However, it functions exactly the same as if the repeat until wasn't in any if statement because repeat until <not (HP) = [2]> wouldn't run at all if the HP wasn't 2 beforehand.

Dinosaurguy77 wrote:

i would save time

I mean it would save time

if <> move () steps ::motion

medians wrote:

Dinosaurguy77 wrote:

i would save time

I mean it would save time

If this was implemented though, would there be blocks like this?

if <> move () steps ::motion

Just because it would save time?

medians wrote:

Dinosaurguy77 wrote:

i would save time

I mean it would save time

If this was implemented though, would there be blocks like this?

if <> move () steps ::motion

Just because it would save time?

if <> then play sound [Mario Jump]