Codingfairy07 wrote:

PenguinLover1123 wrote:

OMEGA SUPPORT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! because 2.0 is ugly

define 2.0 uglyness spray  
//ugly

I wouldn't call 2.0 Ugly, but it is just a different design. As a 2.0 lover and a scratcher who wishes that she could have been on Scratch during 2.0, you are (sort of) offending me. Also, please be constructive. Please explain why you think 2.0 is ugly.

dertermenter wrote:

Codingfairy07 wrote:

PenguinLover1123 wrote:

OMEGA SUPPORT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! because 2.0 is ugly

define 2.0 uglyness spray  
//ugly

I wouldn't call 2.0 Ugly, but it is just a different design. As a 2.0 lover and a scratcher who wishes that she could have been on Scratch during 2.0, you are (sort of) offending me. Also, please be constructive. Please explain why you think 2.0 is ugly.

I think they think it is ugly as darker colours don't normally look as pretty as bright ones. And how can you love 2.0 if you were not on scratch at the time?

dhuls wrote:

Support. I have some ideas
1. All posts made after January 1, 2019 will have all of their Scratchblocks tags converted to 3.0
2. It should work similarly to how it does on the wiki

[scratchblocks=1.4]when green flag clicked // this will result in a Scratch 1.4 block[/scratchblocks]
[scratchblocks=2.0]when green flag clicked // this will result in a Scratch 2.0 block[/scratchblocks]
[scratchblocks=3.0]when green flag clicked // this will result in a Scratch 3.0 block[/scratchblocks]
[scratchblocks]when green flag clicked // this will also result in a Scratch 3.0 block[/scratchblocks]

3. Yes, I do know that on the wiki it is

<scratchblocks version=3.0>

but the previous method is more consistent with the rest of BBCode.

Totodile_star wrote:

Support
Because why not

dertermenter wrote:

Codingfairy07 wrote:

PenguinLover1123 wrote:

OMEGA SUPPORT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! because 2.0 is ugly

define 2.0 uglyness spray  
//ugly

I wouldn't call 2.0 Ugly, but it is just a different design. As a 2.0 lover and a scratcher who wishes that she could have been on Scratch during 2.0, you are (sort of) offending me. Also, please be constructive. Please explain why you think 2.0 is ugly.

I think they think it is ugly as darker colours don't normally look as pretty as bright ones. And how can you love 2.0 if you were not on scratch at the time?

VFDan wrote:

Currently the [scratchblocks] tag is in the 2.0 style, as shown below:

define something

(in 3.0 it is pink). The scratchblocks should be updated to 3.0, as shown here:

RazyRabbit wrote:

VFDan wrote:

Currently the [scratchblocks] tag is in the 2.0 style, as shown below:

define something

(in 3.0 it is pink). The scratchblocks should be updated to 3.0, as shown here:

i totally support

kyleb-2005 wrote:

there already is 30 blocks in scratch and there are more too
i dont know what a lot of them do but i think my brother would know hes good at scratch

(costume #)
go back () layers

go to front

kyleb-2005 wrote:

woah they made 30 scratches? ok i get it, they made the graphics better on this one and notscratch 20
also i didnt know there were form blocks as well as regular blocks, that sounds cool
so when will the new graphics come out

BanMeOS wrote:

dertermenter wrote:

Codingfairy07 wrote:

PenguinLover1123 wrote:

OMEGA SUPPORT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! because 2.0 is ugly

define 2.0 uglyness spray  
//ugly

I wouldn't call 2.0 Ugly, but it is just a different design. As a 2.0 lover and a scratcher who wishes that she could have been on Scratch during 2.0, you are (sort of) offending me. Also, please be constructive. Please explain why you think 2.0 is ugly.

I think they think it is ugly as darker colours don't normally look as pretty as bright ones. And how can you love 2.0 if you were not on scratch at the time?

Could they have had no account?

Reev0102 wrote:

Support, New Scratchers will have problems if what they discuss is different to what they program in. There are various blocks that are different in Scratch 2.0 and Scratch 3.0, such as

(costume #)
go back () layers

go to front

For now, you can use https://scratchblocks.github.io.

Barthdry wrote:

Scratch team didn't did a forum update yet and it takes a lot of time.