The Official List of Rejected Suggestions

2016s4m29

MyScratchedAccount wrote:
(#9577)
crazyfrogcat wrote:
this could be a good suggestion to be added
Why would you create a suggestion for the purpose of it being rejected?

It was created for the purpose of suggesting something, not for it to be rejected

ametrine_

LudwigMcSprinkle wrote:
These ideas are amazing!
Why did they reject them.
when green flag clicked
go to [scratchteam v]
say [Try some of these suggestions. They're helpful.]
go to [home v]
stop [all v]

they give a reason for why each suggestion is rejected, have you read those?

BigNate469

Combining looks effects blocks was rejected due to it being too ambiguous and pointless as the workaround is ridiculously simple.

Probably doesn't need to be added to the list.

Before anyone objects:

OP wrote:
Please also update me on any recently-rejected suggestions so we can discuss whether or not to add them to this list. Even if a suggestion is infrequently suggested or it is “obviously rejected,” it's still helpful for me to see that the suggestion exists

Catscratcher07

crazyfrogcat wrote:
snip

private messaging is already rejected regardless of whether it has a “super” filter, there is no need to ask the ST.

crazyfrogcat

at 6pm utc 0+ (tolors(time(revert(posts(183)))))

crazyfrogcat

Catscratcher07 wrote:
(#9584)
crazyfrogcat wrote:
snip
private messaging is already rejected regardless of whether it has a “super” filter, there is no need to ask the ST.

what about click chat

Catscratcher07

crazyfrogcat wrote:
Catscratcher07 wrote:
(#9584)
crazyfrogcat wrote:
snip
private messaging is already rejected regardless of whether it has a “super” filter, there is no need to ask the ST.
what about click chat

what is “click chat”

crazyfrogcat

Catscratcher07 wrote:
(#9587)
crazyfrogcat wrote:
Catscratcher07 wrote:
(#9584)
crazyfrogcat wrote:
snip
private messaging is already rejected regardless of whether it has a “super” filter, there is no need to ask the ST.
what about click chat
what is “click chat”

basically a chat [b-word that school doesn't like] you have to click to use it

Catscratcher07

crazyfrogcat wrote:
Catscratcher07 wrote:
(#9587)
crazyfrogcat wrote:
Catscratcher07 wrote:
(#9584)
crazyfrogcat wrote:
snip
private messaging is already rejected regardless of whether it has a “super” filter, there is no need to ask the ST.
what about click chat
what is “click chat”
basically a chat [b-word that school doesn't like] you have to click to use it

Private chat is rejected, regardless of whether you need to click to use it—how would it be used without clicking anyway?

crazyfrogcat

Catscratcher07 wrote:
(#9589)
crazyfrogcat wrote:
Catscratcher07 wrote:
(#9587)
crazyfrogcat wrote:
Catscratcher07 wrote:
(#9584)
crazyfrogcat wrote:
snip
private messaging is already rejected regardless of whether it has a “super” filter, there is no need to ask the ST.
what about click chat
what is “click chat”
basically a chat [b-word that school doesn't like] you have to click to use it
Private chat is rejected, regardless of whether you need to click to use it—how would it be used without clicking anyway?

i mean a chat b** you have to click select words/phrases and you can't type anything there (also known as (super?) safe chat)

GameCatastrophe0927

crazyfrogcat wrote:
i mean a chat b** you have to click select words/phrases and you can't type anything there (also known as (super?) safe chat)

I mean, that's allowed, Griffpatch uses it in his projects…
What are you even censoring? The word “box”? You made it sound like you were saying chat b___h but that doesn't make sense… I'm so- I'm so confused…

scareelaree

ametrine_ wrote:
LudwigMcSprinkle wrote:
These ideas are amazing!
Why did they reject them.
when green flag clicked
go to [scratchteam v]
say [Try some of these suggestions. They're helpful.]
go to [home v]
stop [all v]
they give a reason for why each suggestion is rejected, have you read those?

That’s so for real tho…

crazyfrogcat

let's celebrate tolors' 6th b-day here, plus it will be mar10 day on the same day

ToitoGames

Wait, is Scratch AI suggested rejected or not?

The-Sushi-Cat

ToitoGames wrote:
Wait, is Scratch AI suggested rejected or not?

Scratch adding AI image generation is, but not AI in of itself

2.10 AI image generation in Scratch
The Scratch Team has experimented with AI image generation for Scratch in the past. There are benefits for enhancing creativity, including making it easier for Scratchers to make the costumes they want for their projects, as well as inspiring Scratchers to make new stories based on the images they generate. However, there are also many downsides, including ethical concerns arising from AI images using copyrighted material, biases present in AI which reinforce harmful stereotypes, the ease of creating inappropriate content, and the difficulty of accessing AI. For these reasons, the Scratch Team has stated that they will not be adding AI image generation to Scratch anytime soon. For more information, see this article.

However, the use of AI as a virtual assistant is NOT rejected. You can discuss it on this topic. In general, AI in Scratch is not entirely rejected; it depends on the specific use of the AI.

Last edited by The-Sushi-Cat (March 7, 2025 00:04:18)

AmpElectrecuted

TOLORS, Armenia

Za-Chary

crazyfrogcat wrote:
could you pleased add “non-safe-chat” at the start to 7.1

I read your post and all replies to it, and I am also confused as to what you mean here. I think between 3.1 and 7.1, “non-safe-chat” is already covered by one or both of these entries.

Draked12 wrote:
10 days till this topic's 6th birthday!

Happy early birthday to TOLORS!

BigNate469 wrote:
Combining looks effects blocks was rejected due to it being too ambiguous and pointless as the workaround is ridiculously simple.

Probably doesn't need to be added to the list.

Thanks! I agree that we don't need to add it at this time.

crazyfrogcat wrote:
let's celebrate tolors' 6th b-day here, plus it will be mar10 day on the same day

MAR10 day is a day later than TOLORS' birthday, but it's quite coincidental that they are so close to each other!

Super_Basher

BigNate469 wrote:
Combining looks effects blocks was rejected due to it being too ambiguous and pointless as the workaround is ridiculously simple.

Probably doesn't need to be added to the list.

Before anyone objects:
Come one, was it really rejected because it didn’t need to be added to the LIST?
OP wrote:
Please also update me on any recently-rejected suggestions so we can discuss whether or not to add them to this list. Even if a suggestion is infrequently suggested or it is “obviously rejected,” it's still helpful for me to see that the suggestion exists

crazyfrogcat

Za-Chary wrote:
(#9597)
crazyfrogcat wrote:
let's celebrate tolors' 6th b-day here, plus it will be mar10 day on the same day
MAR10 day is a day later than TOLORS' birthday, but it's quite coincidental that they are so close to each other!

but mar10 day and tolors b-day are the same day in my country (in za-charys tolor's b-day is 9th march but mar10 is the same as uk)

StudioPangoFan_2000

Porting Scratch to a non-computer bases system should be rejected.
Also, happy 6th birthday TOLORS!

Discuss Scratch