Discuss Scratch

greentreebee
Scratcher
100+ posts

The Official List of Rejected Suggestions

50_scratch_tabs wrote:

Officially rejected: https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/topic/794906/
what does “NFE” mean
ametrine_
Scratcher
1000+ posts

The Official List of Rejected Suggestions

greentreebee wrote:

what does “NFE” mean
not for everyone. it's a rating scratch team members give projects if they almost (but don't) break the guidelines.
the rating isn't visible, but if a project is nfe it won't show up in search results.
Create-Scratch101
Scratcher
500+ posts

The Official List of Rejected Suggestions

StudioPangoFan_2000
Scratcher
100+ posts

The Official List of Rejected Suggestions

ametrine_ wrote:

greentreebee wrote:

what does “NFE” mean
not for everyone. it's a rating scratch team members give projects if they almost (but don't) break the guidelines.
the rating isn't visible, but if a project is nfe it won't show up in search results.
It also can’t get to the front page in any way.
Cool_kid092
Scratcher
100+ posts

The Official List of Rejected Suggestions

bump
jmb1293634
Scratcher
100+ posts

The Official List of Rejected Suggestions

Cool_kid092 wrote:

bump
bumping stickys won't do anything
Catscratcher07
Scratcher
1000+ posts

The Official List of Rejected Suggestions

jmb1293634 wrote:

Cool_kid092 wrote:

bump
bumping stickys won't do anything
technically it does put it at the top of the stickies, but it is still pointless.
8to16
Scratcher
1000+ posts

The Official List of Rejected Suggestions

Catscratcher07 wrote:

(#9387)

jmb1293634 wrote:

Cool_kid092 wrote:

bump
bumping stickys won't do anything
technically it does put it at the top of the stickies, but it is still pointless.
As pointed out like 15 pages ago, please don't argue over bumping stickies, and don't bump stickies in the first place.

Last edited by 8to16 (Dec. 19, 2024 17:12:21)

PrincessIsza
Scratcher
100+ posts

The Official List of Rejected Suggestions

Sliced-UP wrote:

PrincessIsza wrote:

Ayden7329 wrote:

I think this topic is rejected.
Maybe
I think it is
?
BigNate469
Scratcher
1000+ posts

The Official List of Rejected Suggestions

https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/topic/795797/ (buttons for “support”, “semi-support” and “no support” for suggestions) was rejected, might be worth mentioning under 9.6 that this is also rejected.
crazyfrogcat
Scratcher
500+ posts

The Official List of Rejected Suggestions

here is a new mock up for 6.1 in the list

[b]6.1 [url=https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/post/8079552]delete your comments everywhere[/url] or [url=https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/post/1939992/]edit your comments everywhere[/url][/b]
The inability to delete your comments everywhere is put in place so users do not post inappropriate comments or spam comments on other users' profiles, projects, or studios, just to delete them later on. In contrast, you are not really likely to spam your own projects or profile. The only benefits to this are to remove comments that you did not mean to post and to fix spelling errors. The former could be solved by thinking carefully before posting any comments, and the latter could be worked around by typing slowly and/or stating your mistakes in a reply to the comment. This also applies to forum posts; that is, a feature for Scratchers to delete their own forum posts will not be implemented. This suggestion extends to the ability to delete your own comments even if nobody has seen them yet.

Editing comments could similarly lead to comment manipulation, such as a user commenting "I like this project," waiting until someone replies with "I agree," and then editing the original comment to say "I hate this project." Allowing Scratch Team members to view the edit history of a comment does not make it easy to moderate, since then they have to look carefully at the context of each edit, which takes time.

edit1: i fixed the post

edit2 : i linked a better post

edit3 : i made the post have no separate suggestions

edit4: i updated it

Last edited by crazyfrogcat (Jan. 26, 2025 10:38:51)

Turbo-Code1000
Scratcher
19 posts

The Official List of Rejected Suggestions

MaximunPokeMaster wrote:

A “Go To Middle” block is rejected
PrincessFlowerTV Requested to add this when the 3rd directory was a sticky, but it was never responded by LionHeart70.
https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/topic/341878/?page=1#post-3452628
Paddle said this about it:

Paddle2See wrote:

We want Scratchers to become familiar with the Scratch coordinate system - so I don't think we are likely to want to create a special block that discourages learning about it. But thanks for taking the time to put together this suggestion
I think you can still create a “Go to middle” custom block like this:
Go to middle
define Go to middle
go to x: (0) y: (0)
But the scratch team may add restrictions to the custom blocks too.
Catscratcher07
Scratcher
1000+ posts

The Official List of Rejected Suggestions

Turbo-Code1000 wrote:

MaximunPokeMaster wrote:

A “Go To Middle” block is rejected
PrincessFlowerTV Requested to add this when the 3rd directory was a sticky, but it was never responded by LionHeart70.
https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/topic/341878/?page=1#post-3452628
Paddle said this about it:

Paddle2See wrote:

We want Scratchers to become familiar with the Scratch coordinate system - so I don't think we are likely to want to create a special block that discourages learning about it. But thanks for taking the time to put together this suggestion
I think you can still create a “Go to middle” custom block like this:
Go to middle
define Go to middle
go to x: (0) y: (0)
But the scratch team may add restrictions to the custom blocks too.
No, the ST is not going to add restrictions to custom blocks to prevent them from being used to replicate rejected blocks; suggestions are rejected because they are not worth adding or would cause problems, not because we want to cause qualiity-of-life issues.
crazyfrogcat
Scratcher
500+ posts

The Official List of Rejected Suggestions

when I start as a clone ::cat
create clone of [cat v]
delete this clone
you don't see that ever as only 0.05 people have see it because it's rejected (sort of)

Last edited by crazyfrogcat (Dec. 21, 2024 19:58:20)

Catscratcher07
Scratcher
1000+ posts

The Official List of Rejected Suggestions

crazyfrogcat wrote:

when I start as a clone ::cat
create clone of [cat v]
delete this clone
you don't see that ever as only 0.05 people have see it because it's rejected (sort of)
Scratch crashing scripts are banned, not rejected. Those are entirely separate concepts
8to16
Scratcher
1000+ posts

The Official List of Rejected Suggestions

helloooooo? is za-cherry here????????????

Last edited by 8to16 (Dec. 22, 2024 12:24:56)

2016s4m29
Scratcher
1000+ posts

The Official List of Rejected Suggestions

8to16 wrote:

(#9396)
helloooooo? is za-cherry here????????????
no
starlightsparker
Scratcher
1000+ posts

The Official List of Rejected Suggestions

8to16 wrote:

helloooooo? is za-cherry here????????????
I believe he checks TOLoRS weekly. Please be patient.
Za-Chary
Scratcher
1000+ posts

The Official List of Rejected Suggestions

50_scratch_tabs wrote:

Officially rejected: https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/topic/794906/
Thanks. Has this been rejected before? It seems like it would be a popular suggestion, so I'm wondering if Scratch Team members have said something about this before.

Despite that, I am a little hesitant to add it to the list. Discussion of NFE is not exactly meant to be public, so I don't know if it's a good idea to put it on this list.

8to16 wrote:

i found a way to make the post links shorter than /post/:
[wiki=post:post number]link text[/wiki]
e.g. to link to first post of TOLORS, do this
Since using the /post/ links are easy to do and have no problems associated with them, I think that is what I will continue to use. I don't think we're in danger of reaching the character limit in the OP anytime soon. But thanks anyway.

Create-Scratch101 wrote:

New! Changing the age limit for Parental Consent!
Thanks. I've seen this suggestion once or twice, but I'm tempted to leave it off the list for now because I don't think it's super-popular. Let's see if people keep suggesting it.

BigNate469 wrote:

https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/topic/795797/ (buttons for “support”, “semi-support” and “no support” for suggestions) was rejected, might be worth mentioning under 9.6 that this is also rejected.
This just sounds like a poll in the forums, and is directly rejected; I don't think a separate note is required.

crazyfrogcat wrote:

here is a new mock up for 6.1 in the list
Thanks, but I think I will not make these edits. Your link for “delete your comments everywhere” does not lead to a Scratch Team member's post explaining the rejection. I don't really see the suggestion of “delete comments as a studio host” being a solution to this, as this is not exactly a method of deleting your own comments. That is, this seems like a separate suggestion.

starlightsparker wrote:

8to16 wrote:

helloooooo? is za-cherry here????????????
I believe he checks TOLoRS weekly. Please be patient.
Yes. I was traveling for the past few days and could not reliably update the list at that time. I got back yesterday evening and was spending time with family for the rest of the night.

@8to16, let me once again remind you about three things:
  • I typically check the list every weekend on either Friday, Saturday, or Sunday at potentially different times. So there should not be any expectation of which day I check the list or what time of day I check the list. If it seems that I usually check the list on a certain day/time, that doesn't mean I will always check the list on that day/time.

  • There is actually no expectation that I need to check the list every week, so on rare occasion I may skip a week due to certain circumstances. If this happens, that is fine and nothing worth sending reminders about.

  • If it seems that I am not checking the list, it doesn't make sense to point that out in this thread, because if I am not checking the thread then I will not see any reminders made on the thread.
Please only send a reminder if a full calendar month has passed since I last posted in this thread, and send such a reminder on my profile.
nikky10000000
Scratcher
500+ posts

The Official List of Rejected Suggestions

8to16 wrote:

helloooooo? is za-cherry here????????????
There he is

Powered by DjangoBB