hotcrystal wrote:

About the browser extension policy thing, what if instead, the ST has to manually approve browser extensions as trusted for them to be mentioned?

Za-Chary wrote:

5.1 Remove studio activity messages
Although they may seem annoying at times, they are rather helpful for some users. Removing such messages entirely does not have a clear benefit for everyone. If you find it annoying, one easy way to solve this is to not curate so many studios.

MagicCoder330 wrote:

I think you should clarify in the social action block section that

<loved? :: sensing>
<favorited? :: sensing>

are rejected. not particularly neccasary but may be nice.

nikky10000000 wrote:

Za-Chary wrote:

5.1 Remove studio activity messages
Although they may seem annoying at times, they are rather helpful for some users. Removing such messages entirely does not have a clear benefit for everyone. If you find it annoying, one easy way to solve this is to not curate so many studios.

Also ST: does it in july but brings them back

lesphenry-31 wrote:

I propose removing the ban on adding an option to change your username

lesphenry-31 wrote:

I propose removing the ban on adding an option to change your username

hotcrystal wrote:

What about this? https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/topic/794067/

The-Sushi-Cat wrote:

lesphenry-31 wrote:

I propose removing the ban on adding an option to change your username

Solutions are allowed, but username changing has a bit of issues

The way Scratch stores usernames would make moderation difficult. Plus, people would change their username to avoid punishment or to pretend to be someone else. If you can solve these, then you can make a suggestion

AlejandrixKing245 wrote:

The-Sushi-Cat wrote:

lesphenry-31 wrote:

I propose removing the ban on adding an option to change your username

Solutions are allowed, but username changing has a bit of issues

The way Scratch stores usernames would make moderation difficult. Plus, people would change their username to avoid punishment or to pretend to be someone else. If you can solve these, then you can make a suggestion

I think it's a good idea to add 2 warnings that require your password and add a automatic moderation for usernames that warns about no appropriate username, but it's better to have a manual moderation

The-Sushi-Cat wrote:

AlejandrixKing245 wrote:

The-Sushi-Cat wrote:

lesphenry-31 wrote:

I propose removing the ban on adding an option to change your username

Solutions are allowed, but username changing has a bit of issues

The way Scratch stores usernames would make moderation difficult. Plus, people would change their username to avoid punishment or to pretend to be someone else. If you can solve these, then you can make a suggestion

I think it's a good idea to add 2 warnings that require your password and add a automatic moderation for usernames that warns about no appropriate username, but it's better to have a manual moderation

Well, the issue is changing your username to ‘hide’ from people, so you don't get reported.

Someone sends an email to ST saying, “The-Sushi-Cat is spamming me!” And when ST goes to investigate, the username has been switched to something else. They could go through the logs, however it requires more manpower and time

if they sent a link, that username link would be broken, because my username has been changed, so they would be at a different link

coolpro1290 wrote:

The-Sushi-Cat wrote:

AlejandrixKing245 wrote:

The-Sushi-Cat wrote:

lesphenry-31 wrote:

I propose removing the ban on adding an option to change your username

Solutions are allowed, but username changing has a bit of issues

The way Scratch stores usernames would make moderation difficult. Plus, people would change their username to avoid punishment or to pretend to be someone else. If you can solve these, then you can make a suggestion

I think it's a good idea to add 2 warnings that require your password and add a automatic moderation for usernames that warns about no appropriate username, but it's better to have a manual moderation

Well, the issue is changing your username to ‘hide’ from people, so you don't get reported.

Someone sends an email to ST saying, “The-Sushi-Cat is spamming me!” And when ST goes to investigate, the username has been switched to something else. They could go through the logs, however it requires more manpower and time

if they sent a link, that username link would be broken, because my username has been changed, so they would be at a different link

I kind of agree because recently there has been spammers and if there are spammers to avoid getting deleted they can just change the username, so I agree with you

when red pentagon clicked

myroslava2015 wrote:

(#9357)
Hello, Scratch Team. Please add new block

when @stopSign clicked::events hat

8to16 wrote:

myroslava2015 wrote:

(#9357)
Hello, Scratch Team. Please add new block

when @stopSign clicked::events hat

firstly it's an octagon, not a pentagon (this is a bit of a nitpick),
and this is rejected, please read the list.

(join [online engine] [9])