The Official List of Rejected Suggestions

PaperMarioFan2022

AlejandrixKing245 wrote:
CAN NOT WE GO OFF-TOPIC???

Looks like this is still happening after they were giving out many warnings not to. Should we suggest requesting a full clean-up for TOLORS?

Also please just report any off-topic posts and move on from there. Responding to them more will only cause more users to do the same.

And please stop spamming ? marks.

AlejandrixKing245

PaperMarioFan2022Open in Ocular wrote:
AlejandrixKing245 wrote:
CAN NOT WE GO OFF-TOPIC???
Looks like this is still happening after they were giving out many warnings not to. Should we suggest requesting a full clean-up for TOLORS?

Also please just report any off-topic posts and move on from there. Responding to them more will only cause more users to do the same.

thats good idea

8to16

could we add “remove the suggestions forum” back to the list?

nvm

Last edited by 8to16 (Oct. 16, 2024 18:21:55)

Spaceandmoon1

8to16 wrote:
could we add “remove the suggestions forum” back to the list?

Why would that be helpful?

Catscratcher07

8to16 wrote:
could we add “remove the suggestions forum” back to the list?

“Remove the suggestions forum” was removed from the list because such suggestions generally were jokes or people getting frustrated that their suggestions won't getting implemented within a short time; TOLoRS is not effective at reducing such bad faith suggestions.

Unless you can prove that there has been a wave of serious “Remove the suggestions forum” suggestions lately, I don't think it should be added back.

starlightsparker

Perhaps, this as well should be added to the private messaging rejection as not rejected.

Xzillox

starlightsparker wrote:
Perhaps, this as well should be added to the private messaging rejection as not rejected.

that actually seems quite similar to the other non rejected one

starlightsparker

Xzillox wrote:
that actually seems quite similar to the other non rejected one

It’s not the same, in fact, Paddle2See denied closing it as it is similar but not the same.
The other suggestion only supports 1:1 chats, and there is not a designated place for these and there can be these 1:1 chats on any normal comment section.
As for mine, they support 1:1 as well as group chats, and have a designated place for them and cannot be present on any normal comment section.

Xzillox

starlightsparker wrote:
Xzillox wrote:
that actually seems quite similar to the other non rejected one
It’s not the same, in fact, Paddle2See denied closing it as it is similar but not the same.
The other suggestion only supports 1:1 chats, and there is not a designated place for these and there can be these 1:1 chats on any normal comment section.
As for mine, they support 1:1 as well as group chats, and have a designated place for them and cannot be present on any normal comment section.

ah ok i see now. still similar but i see the differences

Za-Chary

In 9.1, I changed “Discuss tab” to “Discuss button.” That's probably more accurate, right?

Coughfe wrote:
Za-Chary wrote:
I've been using the post/ID links whenever I add a new entry to the list. This is something I want to do, but I haven't had the chance to do it. Now that the forums load quickly, I may be able to do it faster. When I finish writing this post, I'll update some of them at least in Section 2, and see if I can continue this later.
I forgot to remind, whoop.
Doesn't seem like anyone else has, so uh…
Reminder

An update: this is now complete. Thanks again for bringing it up!

8to16 wrote:
“Former Scratch Team Member” rank just got rejected
https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/post/8187666/

Thanks. Thoughts on whether or not I should add this to the list? It's unclear to me at the moment if this is a popular suggestion. (I am particularly interested in how many users really wanted this to be a suggestion in the link shown above.)

UserBlockedYou wrote:
Yes, file blocks are rejected for security reasons. See: Post by Paddle2See

I'd like to know if anyone has other examples of this one being suggested. Also, it's a little unclear to me what precisely this is suggesting, so unless there is another similar thread that was closed/rejected, I'm not sure I can add this to the list.

PaperMarioFan2022 wrote:
AlejandrixKing245 wrote:
CAN NOT WE GO OFF-TOPIC???
Looks like this is still happening after they were giving out many warnings not to. Should we suggest requesting a full clean-up for TOLORS?

Also please just report any off-topic posts and move on from there. Responding to them more will only cause more users to do the same.

I'm not seeing much of a need for a “clean-up,” unless there were many posts made and deleted before I looked at this thread.

I do agree with the second part, though. Just use the Report button on the off-topic posts. Saying “stop getting off-topic” doesn't really help anyone.

starlightsparker wrote:
It’s not the same, in fact, Paddle2See denied closing it as it is similar but not the same.
The other suggestion only supports 1:1 chats, and there is not a designated place for these and there can be these 1:1 chats on any normal comment section.
As for mine, they support 1:1 as well as group chats, and have a designated place for them and cannot be present on any normal comment section.

In that case, yours actually seems more general than the other one. Personally I think one could really be closed as a duplicate of the other; these suggestions are so similar that I'm not really sure it's worth putting both in the list. So I'm going to replace that link with your suggestion (since yours is more general).

8to16

Za-Chary wrote:
Thanks. Thoughts on whether or not I should add this to the list? It's unclear to me at the moment if this is a popular suggestion. (I am particularly interested in how many users really wanted this to be a suggestion in the link shown above.)

A dupe of it was made just before it got rejected
Also a few years ago https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/topic/453093

Catscratcher07

Za-Chary wrote:
UserBlockedYou wrote:
Yes, file blocks are rejected for security reasons. See: Post by Paddle2See
I'd like to know if anyone has other examples of this one being suggested. Also, it's a little unclear to me what precisely this is suggesting, so unless there is another similar thread that was closed/rejected, I'm not sure I can add this to the list.

https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/post/7677180/ — doesn't hard reject, but closes so that file formats can be considered on a case-by-case basis

The only conclusively rejected file blocks are ones that allow any file format, it would seem.

I have reported a few old file block suggestions with “rejection?”, so if anything surfaces with a rejection statement, then someone ought to report it here.

alpha_ape_13

Renaming scratch possibly rejected?
https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/topic/778940/?page=2#post-8123804

Last edited by alpha_ape_13 (Oct. 20, 2024 22:55:12)

ThisIsTemp1

alpha_ape_13 wrote:
Renaming scratch possibly rejected?
https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/topic/778940/?page=2#post-8123804

https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/post/8132243/

ihavenocluewhythisis

https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/topic/785592/

Catscratcher07

ihavenocluewhythisis wrote:
https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/topic/785592/

That is not rejected.

AliMASTER430258

Another one down, and another one down.
Another one bite the dust.

Catscratcher07

AliMASTER430258 wrote:
Another one down, and another one down.
Another one bite the dust.

https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/post/8132243/

MagicCoder330

A fine addition to your collection: https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/topic/785596/

ThisIsTemp1

MagicCoder330 wrote:
A fine addition to your collection: https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/topic/785596/

I’m wondering if this rejection basically makes all emoji suggestions rejected.

Discuss Scratch