So, I was thinking that, maybe, if you are the owner of a studio, you have the ability to give up your role as owner and make someone else the owner of the studio?

Support.

Suppose you want to leave a studio that you made, but it's super popular, so you don't want to just delete it. There's nothing you can really do. Your suggestion would allow you to effectively leave the studio without deleting it.

However, I think it must be so that there's only one owner at any given time. Also, only the current owner can change who the owner is, with permission from the other Scratcher.

Za-Chary wrote:

However, I think it must be so that there's only one owner at any given time.

That's what I was aiming for. Like in Google Docs, there can only be one owner of the document. Same case here - There can only be one owner of the studio at a time.

Support for reasons above. I also think that in the case of a deleted account, ownership should be assigned to one of the managers, though I don't know what order it should do that in. Maybe the user must specify when deleting?

TheRealNetherBefore wrote:

Support for reasons above. I also think that in the case of a deleted account, ownership should be assigned to one of the managers, though I don't know what order it should do that in. Maybe the user must specify when deleting?

Perhaps if that was the case, it'd go to the manager/curator who checks on the studio the most.

Just found a studio that would maybe benefit from this idea, as the owner isn't active anymore -
https://scratch.mit.edu/studios/1070630/

Even though this is a duplicate, I still support. I have a studio I made a long time ago that I no longer care about, but a lot of other people seem to, and I'd like to give up my role as owner and let someone else take control.

LionHeart70 wrote:

Even though this is a duplicate—

Oh, whoops. Didn't know this has already been suggested.

Galxia why r u so unobservant

Support.

1004587 wrote:

TheRealNetherBefore wrote:

Support for reasons above. I also think that in the case of a deleted account, ownership should be assigned to one of the managers, though I don't know what order it should do that in. Maybe the user must specify when deleting?

Perhaps if that was the case, it'd go to the manager/curator who checks on the studio the most.

We could throw in a co-owner system for that…

Hex4Nova wrote:

Support.

Reasons?…

Galaxia_TheWolf684 wrote:

Hex4Nova wrote:

Support.

Reasons?…

Reasons above. It's a good idea with virtually no downside that can be applied in a variety of situations, as long as both parties must agree to said change.

Bump oKAYYYYY why am I doing this I'm pretty sure this topic already died like all my other topicssssssss……

Hex4Nova wrote:

Support.

1004587 wrote:

TheRealNetherBefore wrote:

Support for reasons above. I also think that in the case of a deleted account, ownership should be assigned to one of the managers, though I don't know what order it should do that in. Maybe the user must specify when deleting?

Perhaps if that was the case, it'd go to the manager/curator who checks on the studio the most.

We could throw in a co-owner system for that…

support for this and the co-owner system. Shall we make another topic for co-owner suggestion?

Support, I guess. It'd surely be a great idea for when someone is becoming too inactive or whatever other reason

Support, for the reasons above. I think this would also be great for Forum Topics like shops.

Support for reasons above.
I'd just like to add on one of my own reasons why I support. The first Scratch account that my friend ever made she deleted, except turned off the comments in all her studios. I was a manager in the majority of these because we were (and still are) really good friends. Anyways, she later on made a few more accounts, and I feel like if this suggestion were put into play before she deleted her account that those studios could still be active to this day.

Galaxia_TheWolf684 wrote:

thIS IS THE MOST SUPPORT I'VE GOTTEN, EVER–

I understand, that happened to me as well.

Support!

sowut123 wrote:

Support!

Why do you support?