Cloud variables are very very annoying because Lightnin is going around and saying “you'll get removed from the 2.0 beta.” Stop scaring people. I am unsharing all cloud data things since apparently, if it can be used as a chatroom in some way or shape or form…

Several encoders, the only way I could make a string thing to do good highscores, are taken down.

Wow. Just stop - that is insane.

tlangster i would recomend re wording that it might rub somone in ST the wrong way…
but i do think we should be able to use our encoders for non chat things

botcrusher wrote:

tlangster i would recomend re wording that it might rub somone in ST the wrong way…
but i do think we should be able to use our encoders for non chat things

I know! I tried that and I wasn't even allowed to! This really isn't fair. I worked hours on that.

ImagineIt wrote:

botcrusher wrote:

tlangster i would recomend re wording that it might rub somone in ST the wrong way…
but i do think we should be able to use our encoders for non chat things

I know! I tried that and I wasn't even allowed to! This really isn't fair. I worked hours on that.

Exactly! hard work that we made cant be shared just because we decided to try something new! In fact, it saves the ST a ton of time! This is beta version, and beta is for trying new things!

ImagineIt wrote:

botcrusher wrote:

tlangster i would recomend re wording that it might rub somone in ST the wrong way…
but i do think we should be able to use our encoders for non chat things

I know! I tried that and I wasn't even allowed to! This really isn't fair. I worked hours on that.

yeah i spent a good deal of time, but for now while it's unshared let's re-program them to act as encryptors!
that was the original intent before i modified it for tlangster's private chat where it doubled as encryption and encoding.

ImagineIt wrote:

botcrusher wrote:

tlangster i would recomend re wording that it might rub somone in ST the wrong way…
but i do think we should be able to use our encoders for non chat things

I know! I tried that and I wasn't even allowed to! This really isn't fair. I worked hours on that.

What's up with that?

ImagineIt wrote:

botcrusher wrote:

tlangster i would recomend re wording that it might rub somone in ST the wrong way…
but i do think we should be able to use our encoders for non chat things

I know! I tried that and I wasn't even allowed to! This really isn't fair. I worked hours on that.

Heh, it took me only 20 mins to make my encoder

botcrusher wrote:

ImagineIt wrote:

botcrusher wrote:

tlangster i would recomend re wording that it might rub somone in ST the wrong way…
but i do think we should be able to use our encoders for non chat things

I know! I tried that and I wasn't even allowed to! This really isn't fair. I worked hours on that.

yeah i spent a good deal of time, but for now while it's unshared let's re-program them to act as encryptors!
that was the original intent before i modified it for tlangster's private chat where it doubled as encryption and encoding.

I did that before it was cool.

wormboy wrote:

ImagineIt wrote:

botcrusher wrote:

tlangster i would recomend re wording that it might rub somone in ST the wrong way…
but i do think we should be able to use our encoders for non chat things

I know! I tried that and I wasn't even allowed to! This really isn't fair. I worked hours on that.

Heh, it took me only 20 mins to make my encoder

My original one took the same amount of time, but then i had to rewrite it for using only numbers

Lol, while looking at this, I was playing this. ( It's a project. )