***** - Idea for a new 403 page design - *****

TopicBumper

BUTOTTHNBDIYANSNPITME.

Well, it was necroposted on a few months ago, but I want some discussion.

dertermenter

I saw one with Gobo holding a stop sign and that looks way better than this one.

Thoughts on AFD on the forums

The2000 wrote:
All suggestions are unnecessary. If a suggestion is necessary then it's a bug report.

dertermenter wrote:
April Fools Day on the forums has been a repeated privilege, not an expectation

ScratchCatHELLO

I made this a while ago

ScratchCatHELLO
I have 5600+ posts, I've been on scratch for 5 1/2 years, I'm a Forum Helper™ and I have a Scratch Wiki account!
I like: Python, CSS, Javascript, Rust

Python 3 Text Adventure
cool new browser game - cursed laughing-crying emoji - Illuminati - you know waterbenders, but do you know stock-imagebenders? - snek - vibin' - Bump song (vevo) - Speed bump - yee - fred - m i c k e y

the2000

Jeez, that initial mock-up is crusty

cruncherBones

It is to low quality - no support.

The page does need redesign though

THE TRUE HIPPO ON SCRATCH

platfomer coming soon

funny by my m8

avekdongol

neeb132 wrote:
What pages lead you to a 403? I've never seen one.

https://scratch.mit.edu/images/
https://scratch.mit.edu/images/emoji/easter_eggs/ksllxmfcai.png (not on april fools)

Oops! My signature was eaten by an evil kumquat!

Bring the cat blocks back!

TalksInBlocksfan

avekdongol wrote:
neeb132 wrote:
What pages lead you to a 403? I've never seen one.
https://scratch.mit.edu/images/
https://scratch.mit.edu/images/emoji/easter_eggs/ksllxmfcai.png (not on april fools)

change pen color by (The Easter Egg one is different from the 403 test page.)
https://scratch.mit.edu/403

Last edited by TalksInBlocksfan (June 19, 2021 23:01:48)

EatNYeet

cruncherBones wrote:
It is to low quality - no support.

The page does need redesign though

You're literally no-supporting a suggestion because of a mockup??? That is extremely unconstructive. It's not only saying the designer is bad, but that's like saying no support for a block suggestion where the topic owner makes the mockup as a custom block, like this:

block idea []

Why is this a thing?

dertermenter

EatNYeet wrote:
cruncherBones wrote:
It is to low quality - no support.

The page does need redesign though
You're literally no-supporting a suggestion because of a mockup??? That is extremely unconstructive. It's not only saying the designer is bad, but that's like saying no support for a block suggestion where the topic owner makes the mockup as a custom block, like this:
block idea []

Because the mock-up is the main part of the post. This is what they want it changed to. That isn’t unconstructive. And you can be critical in Suggestions . Your Block anology isn’t fair as the block wouldn’t be the main part of the block, it would be the function of the block. This is completely on design an the mock-up should be he main talking point.

Thoughts on AFD on the forums

The2000 wrote:
All suggestions are unnecessary. If a suggestion is necessary then it's a bug report.

dertermenter wrote:
April Fools Day on the forums has been a repeated privilege, not an expectation

gdpr5b78aa4361827f5c2a08d700

i dont think it makes sense for a 403 page to say “our server is scratch'ing it's head” (even though even scratch.mit.edu/403 says it), since you don't tend to scratch your head when you dont want someone to do something.

han614698

Support, the other one is outdated, but get rid of the “contact the scratch team to find out” because they will not tell you anything about it, sorry.

banner coming soon…

Codingfairy07

potatophant wrote:
i dont think it makes sense for a 403 page to say “our server is scratch'ing it's head” (even though even scratch.mit.edu/403 says it), since you don't tend to scratch your head when you dont want someone to do something.

Yes, maybe it should say “403. You don't have access to view this page”
Support. The old cat is outdated.

 (φ゜▽゜*♪) :: sensing // This is Laura, my kumquat guard who never sleeps. Sleeping is for amateur Kumquat guards.

Announcement
;

Codingfairy07

dertermenter wrote:
EatNYeet wrote:
cruncherBones wrote:
It is to low quality - no support.

The page does need redesign though
You're literally no-supporting a suggestion because of a mockup??? That is extremely unconstructive. It's not only saying the designer is bad, but that's like saying no support for a block suggestion where the topic owner makes the mockup as a custom block, like this:
block idea []
Because the mock-up is the main part of the post. This is what they want it changed to. That isn’t unconstructive. And you can be critical in Suggestions . Your Block anology isn’t fair as the block wouldn’t be the main part of the block, it would be the function of the block. This is completely on design an the mock-up should be he main talking point.

I think they were talking about the other mockup, “depression cat”

 (φ゜▽゜*♪) :: sensing // This is Laura, my kumquat guard who never sleeps. Sleeping is for amateur Kumquat guards.

Announcement
;

EatNYeet

dertermenter wrote:
the block wouldn’t be the main part of the block, it would be the function of the block.

My point, exactly.

Take the early days of Mario. Were they all, “No, this early version sucks, let's not do that”? No. Nintendo went along with it, and improved on his design and personality over time.

The title for this suggestion is "Idea for a new 403 page design“, not ”Make this the new 403 page design“. They're giving their idea for a new 403 design, being open to suggestions and improvements. They are not suggesting ”Okay, we should make this, exactly how it is, the new 403 page." The point is the main idea to make the 403 page look nicer.

Last edited by EatNYeet (June 20, 2021 17:58:08)

Why is this a thing?

dertermenter

EatNYeet wrote:
dertermenter wrote:
the block wouldn’t be the main part of the block, it would be the function of the block.
My point, exactly.

Take the early days of Mario. Were they all, “No, this early version sucks, let's not do that”? No. Nintendo went along with it, and improved on his design and personality over time.

The title for this suggestion is "Idea for a new 403 page design“, not ”Make this the new 403 page design“. They're giving their idea for a new 403 design, being open to suggestions and improvements. They are not suggesting ”Okay, we should make this, exactly how it is, the new 403 page." The point is the main idea to make the 403 page look nicer.

Sorry, no. The main point of this suggestion is the design and that is what they want it changed to. Same suggestion with different design wouldn’t be a duplicate as the design is different, which does it’s the design here. I think you may be confused. Although offering improvements can be the most constructive and welcoming way to criticise, saying no support on the design is not unconstructive.

Thoughts on AFD on the forums

The2000 wrote:
All suggestions are unnecessary. If a suggestion is necessary then it's a bug report.

dertermenter wrote:
April Fools Day on the forums has been a repeated privilege, not an expectation

Wyatt516

neeb132 wrote:
What pages lead you to a 403? I've never seen one.

https://scratch.mit.edu/403/

My browser / operating system: Windows 11, Firefox 115.0, can you guess my flash version?

(0) v (0) :: looks reporter // this is the guy, he does nothing to protect my signature from evil kumquats

i am in this project: https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/834038068/

don't look at my old posts

please

scratchering_coder

neeb132 wrote:
What pages lead you to a 403? I've never seen one.

https://en.scratch-wiki.info/wiki/403_Error

scratcherevancats

my 550 error is on my project

My browser / operating system: ChromeOS 13904.97.0, Chrome 91.0.4472.167, No Flash version detected

move (6) steps
move (5) steps

when green flag clicked
go to x: (-150) y: (50)
set [X Velocity v] to [0]
set [Y Velocity v] to [0]
[[scratchblocks]
/scratchblocks]
forever
if <> then
<key [right arrow v] pressed?>
change [X Velocity v] by (1)
end
if <key [left arrow v] pressed?> then
change [X Velocity v] by (-1)
end
set [X Velocity v] to ((X Velocity) * (0.8))
change x by (X Velocity)
end
end
[/scratchblocks]

scratcherevancats

dude341 wrote:
neeb132 wrote:
dude341 wrote:
neeb132 wrote:
dude341 wrote:
neeb132 wrote:
What pages lead you to a 403? I've never seen one.
Any page the Scratch team are only allowed to see will give you a 403. You can also see it by going to https://scratch.mit.edu/403/ . As you can see, it's extremely outdated.
I see. Well, I support!
Thanks for supporting!
I think it should be more like this though.

The best I can do for now…
Nice one!

but what

ce6704e6-8629-4493-b1d0-773f9cebb5f4

when green flag clicked
go to x: (-150) y: (50)
set [X Velocity v] to [0]
set [Y Velocity v] to [0]
[[scratchblocks]
/scratchblocks]
forever
if <> then
<key [right arrow v] pressed?>
change [X Velocity v] by (1)
end
if <key [left arrow v] pressed?> then
change [X Velocity v] by (-1)
end
set [X Velocity v] to ((X Velocity) * (0.8))
change x by (X Velocity)
end
end
[/scratchblocks]

scratcherevancats

scratcherevancats wrote:
dude341 wrote:
neeb132 wrote:
dude341 wrote:
neeb132 wrote:
dude341 wrote:
neeb132 wrote:
What pages lead you to a 403? I've never seen one.
Any page the Scratch team are only allowed to see will give you a 403. You can also see it by going to https://scratch.mit.edu/403/ . As you can see, it's extremely outdated.
I see. Well, I support!
Thanks for supporting!
I think it should be more like this though.

The best I can do for now…
Nice one!

but what

ce6704e6-8629-4493-b1d0-773f9cebb5f4

when green flag clicked
go to x: (-150) y: (50)
set [X Velocity v] to [0]
set [Y Velocity v] to [0]
[[scratchblocks]
/scratchblocks]
forever
if <> then
<key [right arrow v] pressed?>
change [X Velocity v] by (1)
end
if <key [left arrow v] pressed?> then
change [X Velocity v] by (-1)
end
set [X Velocity v] to ((X Velocity) * (0.8))
change x by (X Velocity)
end
end
[/scratchblocks]

Discuss Scratch