mrf777 wrote:

the_lova_skul wrote:

coby112 wrote:

mrf777 wrote:

the_lova_skul wrote:

coby112 wrote:

mrf777 wrote:

coby112 wrote:

mrf777 wrote:

coby112 wrote:

How come there isn't a

<touching section [   v] of sprite[ v]?>

Meaning you could split a sprite into sections so you could writes scripts like

when [a v] key pressed
If <touching section [ sword  v] of sprite[ ike v]?> then
 
switch costume to [ injured v]

change [ link hp v] by (-30)

  

i agree.

thanks it would be easier to make fighting games

why not a split block

split sprite [ v] into [ 3 ] peices

would this only be limited to the vector editor? because the bitmap editor is just one layer.

yeah. probably.

then that would suck for me cuz i hate using vector

me too!

OOOO KKKKK
Did not no so many people hated vector

the reason i hate vector is becuz its so hard to draw anything this is what happened when i drew mario in vector: http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/26337600/

exactly

coby112 wrote:

mrf777 wrote:

the_lova_skul wrote:

coby112 wrote:

mrf777 wrote:

the_lova_skul wrote:

coby112 wrote:

mrf777 wrote:

coby112 wrote:

mrf777 wrote:

coby112 wrote:

How come there isn't a

<touching section [   v] of sprite[ v]?>

Meaning you could split a sprite into sections so you could writes scripts like

when [a v] key pressed
If <touching section [ sword  v] of sprite[ ike v]?> then
 
switch costume to [ injured v]

change [ link hp v] by (-30)

  

i agree.

thanks it would be easier to make fighting games

why not a split block

split sprite [ v] into [ 3 ] peices

would this only be limited to the vector editor? because the bitmap editor is just one layer.

yeah. probably.

then that would suck for me cuz i hate using vector

me too!

OOOO KKKKK
Did not no so many people hated vector

the reason i hate vector is becuz its so hard to draw anything this is what happened when i drew mario in vector: http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/26337600/

exactly

odd. try using spriters resource for good quality sprites

the_lova_skul wrote:

coby112 wrote:

mrf777 wrote:

the_lova_skul wrote:

coby112 wrote:

mrf777 wrote:

the_lova_skul wrote:

coby112 wrote:

mrf777 wrote:

coby112 wrote:

mrf777 wrote:

coby112 wrote:

How come there isn't a

<touching section [   v] of sprite[ v]?>

Meaning you could split a sprite into sections so you could writes scripts like

when [a v] key pressed
If <touching section [ sword  v] of sprite[ ike v]?> then
 
switch costume to [ injured v]

change [ link hp v] by (-30)

  

i agree.

thanks it would be easier to make fighting games

why not a split block

split sprite [ v] into [ 3 ] peices

would this only be limited to the vector editor? because the bitmap editor is just one layer.

yeah. probably.

then that would suck for me cuz i hate using vector

me too!

OOOO KKKKK
Did not no so many people hated vector

the reason i hate vector is becuz its so hard to draw anything this is what happened when i drew mario in vector: http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/26337600/

exactly

odd. try using spriters resource for good quality sprites

spriters resource??

define Life

set [Life] to [Scratch]

go to x: (10) y: (100) z: (10)

set point (5) to x: (1) y: (10) z: (25)

deleat point (2)

flat shade polygons in sprite (4)

enable frame skipping

smooth polygon texture in sprite (2)

set polygon (56) size to (100)%

rotate polygon (34) clockwise (2) degrees

change costume/texture to (11)

polygon (20), go to x: (1) y: (20) z: (2)
 

mrf777 wrote:

in scratch 3.0, can there be an option to make a project downloadable and be played on IOS or Android? because making a game for a moble device is just cool, and scratch is easy to use. there could be several posibilities with such a different feature! if a 3D editor was added too! there could be even MORE possibilities!

the_lova_skul wrote:

mrf777 wrote:

in scratch 3.0, can there be an option to make a project downloadable and be played on IOS or Android? because making a game for a moble device is just cool, and scratch is easy to use. there could be several posibilities with such a different feature! if a 3D editor was added too! there could be even MORE possibilities!

there already is a scratch touch screen thing it's called scratch jr as for the 3d i wish the scratch team would do it its still possible to make 3d things but a heck of alot harder the scratch team won't listen thay say 3d would make scratch more complicated when in realit it would make so many peaple happy and LESS complicated cuz noobs cat just use 2d while pros can use 3d and make it LESS hard to make 3d projects!!!

Nt45 wrote:

Do you think you could make cloud data more than numbers?

cheeta wrote:

I love the ability to see inside the project on the website without having to download it, but won't this also make it easier to “cheat” by changing variables or editing scripts for infinite lives? Since one of my main goals is making games that grow from an easy start to a very hard end, I feel the challenges could be ignored and games could easily become pointless when everyone knows they could easily beat a level that's supposed to be very hard. However, the cloud variable feature also makes full-length games much better because people can easily save, come back later, and jump right in where they left off. Also, will dragging a sprite from one project into another and then sharing that project cause the original sprite creator to appear somewhere on the page? It seems like complex sprites with lots of work can be put into other projects without giving credit to the original creator, a problem which is already big enough through importing. I have seen lots of imports of projects on the top loved list where the Scratcher is claiming all the credit without even changing a thing. This makes me worried that the years I put into a project could go unnoticed when I share it, but be placed into an other project where someone claims they made it and have them get all the credit for it.

mrf777 wrote:

Nt45 wrote:

Do you think you could make cloud data more than numbers?

i think this will not happen, because chat rooms could be too easy to make.

Saiid wrote:

I have

mrf777 wrote:

Nt45 wrote:

Do you think you could make cloud data more than numbers?

i think this will not happen, because chat rooms could be too easy to make.

there are chat options in some games…

little_kitten wrote:

What shape is this room?
I'm assuming rectangular, but maybe a star because it's fabulous?
Maybe a circle with two seats on one side and a curved TV on the other(Because that would look like this- )

mrf777 wrote:

Nt45 wrote:

Do you think you could make cloud data more than numbers?

i think this will not happen, because chat rooms could be too easy to make.

play sound [medival1] For a tiny bit of time.. lol such troll