Ok, so I want a scratch block that looks like this.

(() to ():: sensing)

or

(() to ():: operators)

It would be useful as you can make scripts like this

if <<(mouse x) = ((56) to (-56):: sensing)> and <(mouse y) = ((85) to (45):: sensing)>> then
do something

or

if <<(mouse x) = ((56) to (-56):: operators)> and <(mouse y) = ((85) to (45):: operators)>> then
do something

There is a way to do this by making a list and adding all the x or y places, but that is very time consuming.


It probably should be green but it could be used in operations.


Please submit your thoughts

TheUltermateFollower wrote:

Ok, so I want a scratch block that looks like this. except green

(() to ())

It would be useful as you can make scripts like this

if <<(mouse x) = ((56) to (-56))> and <(mouse y) = ((85) to (45))>> then
do something

Please submit your thoughts

Round or hexagon blocks need to have a single value. Maybe something like this?

<() is between () and () :: operators>

24691357 wrote:

TheUltermateFollower wrote:

Ok, so I want a scratch block that looks like this. except green

(() to ())

It would be useful as you can make scripts like this

if <<(mouse x) = ((56) to (-56))> and <(mouse y) = ((85) to (45))>> then
do something

Please submit your thoughts

Round or hexagon blocks need to have a single value. Maybe something like this?

<() is between () and () :: operators>

should it be blue or green, sensing or operations

24691357 wrote:

TheUltermateFollower wrote:

Ok, so I want a scratch block that looks like this. except green

(() to ())

It would be useful as you can make scripts like this

if <<(mouse x) = ((56) to (-56))> and <(mouse y) = ((85) to (45))>> then
do something

Please submit your thoughts

Round or hexagon blocks need to have a single value. Maybe something like this?

<() is between () and () :: operators>

you mean an answer. Then I guess you could do it like this with that one

if <<(mouse x) is between (56) and (-56) :: operators> and <(mouse y) is between (85) and (45) :: operators>> then
do something

say((1)to(10)::operators)

What would the sprite say?

TheUltermateFollower wrote:

Ok, so I want a scratch block that looks like this. except blue or green. idk

(() to ())

It would be useful as you can make scripts like this

if <<(mouse x) = ((56) to (-56))> and <(mouse y) = ((85) to (45))>> then
do something

There is a way to do this by making a list and adding all the x or y places, but that is very time consuming.




Please submit your thoughts

Is this new block like the

(pick random () to ())

?

Yanderan wrote:

TheUltermateFollower wrote:

Ok, so I want a scratch block that looks like this. except blue or green. idk

(() to ())

It would be useful as you can make scripts like this

if <<(mouse x) = ((56) to (-56))> and <(mouse y) = ((85) to (45))>> then
do something

There is a way to do this by making a list and adding all the x or y places, but that is very time consuming.




Please submit your thoughts

Is this new block like the

(pick random () to ())

?

No, It senses if your sprite or mouse pointer is between one x (or y) point and another x (or y) point

Sheep_maker wrote:

say((1)to(10)::operators)

What would the sprite say?

what do you mean?

TheUltermateFollower wrote:

24691357 wrote:

TheUltermateFollower wrote:

Ok, so I want a scratch block that looks like this. except green

(() to ())

It would be useful as you can make scripts like this

if <<(mouse x) = ((56) to (-56))> and <(mouse y) = ((85) to (45))>> then
do something

Please submit your thoughts

Round or hexagon blocks need to have a single value. Maybe something like this?

<() is between () and () :: operators>

you mean an answer. Then I guess you could do it like this with that one

if <<(mouse x) is between (56) and (-56) :: operators> and <(mouse y) is between (85) and (45) :: operators>> then
do something

Yes, it's used like this.

Sheep_maker wrote:

say((1)to(10)::operators)

What would the sprite say?

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
It's like a list.

Support if I haven't.

<<(mouse x) > [-57]> and <(mouse x) < [57]>>

No support.

Scratcher1002 wrote:

Sheep_maker wrote:

say((1)to(10)::operators)

What would the sprite say?

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
It's like a list.

Support if I haven't.

Then this

<[5] = ((1) to (10) :: operators)>

is not true as 5 is not 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10. Unless Scratch handles it as list internally…

<<(number) > [min]> and <(number) < [max]>>

No support as per seanbobe.

Scratcher1002 wrote:

Sheep_maker wrote:

say((1)to(10)::operators)

What would the sprite say?

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
It's like a list.

Support if I haven't.

So, assuming first class lists are invented implemented,

<((1)to(10)::operators) contains [5]>

EDIT: Used the wrong word

Support if first class lists are implanted, no support otherwise.

What would this return? Does it keep returning with different values until the containing block returns true?

helloandgoodbye9 wrote:

Support if first class lists are implanted, no support otherwise.

xD

Jonathan50 wrote:

What would this return? Does it keep returning with different values until the containing block returns true?

helloandgoodbye9 wrote:

Support if first class lists are implanted, no support otherwise.

xD

lol bad spellcheck. Im too tired to edit it though.

helloandgoodbye9 wrote:

Support if first class lists are implanted, no support otherwise.

what do you mean?

Jonathan50 wrote:

What would this return? Does it keep returning with different values until the containing block returns true?

helloandgoodbye9 wrote:

Support if first class lists are implanted, no support otherwise.

xD

it was a thing?

Scratcher1002 wrote:

Sheep_maker wrote:

say((1)to(10)::operators)

What would the sprite say?

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
It's like a list.

Support if I haven't.

thx

Sorry if I sound incompetent but isn't this the same as:

(pick random (1) to (10))

TheUltermateFollower wrote:

it was a thing?

What?