[ATC#5] Codegolfing to the Extreme!

Random-Man

wizzwizz7 wrote:
CodeLegend wrote:
Yes, it is. So is “_”, since it's purpose isn't to output itself. (as compared to 0, 1, 2, etc., which are meant to output themselves)
*its

:O
Yes! Grammar corrections!!
Also, good job @wizzwizz7
I saw you kept making your programs shorter… and shorter…

gtoal wrote:
However the answer is 42. Now… what was the question?

birdoftheday

To anybody who thinks correcting people's grammar is “cool”, it's not. It's disrespectful more than anything.

Am I the only person who likes 3.0 better than 2.0, or do the people who do just not talk about it?

MegaApuTurkUltra

birdoftheday wrote:
To anybody who thinks correcting people's grammar is “cool,” it's not. It's disrespectful more than anything.

The comma goes inside quotation marks.

/s

$(".box-head")[0].textContent = "committing AT crimes since $whenever"

Jonathan50

MegaApuTurkUltra wrote:
The comma goes inside quotation marks.

Noo!

This is so horrible

Not yet a Knight of the Mu Calculus.

TheMonsterOfTheDeep

MegaApuTurkUltra wrote:
birdoftheday wrote:
To anybody who thinks correcting people's grammar is “cool,” it's not. It's disrespectful more than anything.
The comma goes inside quotation marks.

I often leave the comma outside the quotation marks because otherwise that would obfuscate my meaning

my latest extension: 2d vector math

wizzwizz7

Random-Man wrote:
wizzwizz7 wrote:
CodeLegend wrote:
Yes, it is. So is “_”, since it's purpose isn't to output itself. (as compared to 0, 1, 2, etc., which are meant to output themselves)
*its
:O
Yes! Grammar corrections!!
Also, good job @wizzwizz7
I saw you kept making your programs shorter… and shorter…

My language was rubbish.

I'm working on a better one now and I came back to this forum to look for some of the challenges.

WooHooBoy

I am as well, actually. I think I'm going to make mine work with mainly ASCII art though, I haven't seen a language do that and I think it would be nice

considered harmful

CodeLegend

wizzwizz7 wrote:
CodeLegend wrote:
Yes, it is. So is “_”, since it's purpose isn't to output itself. (as compared to 0, 1, 2, etc., which are meant to output themselves)
*its

Please do stop. You aren't contributing anything useful at all. I know the difference between “its” and “it's”, and this response does nothing to change the fact that I occasionally make errors by accident.

“… your beard people are crazier than my hat people.”

Firedrake969

CodeLegend wrote:
wizzwizz7 wrote:
CodeLegend wrote:
Yes, it is. So is “_”, since it's purpose isn't to output itself. (as compared to 0, 1, 2, etc., which are meant to output themselves)
*its
Please do stop. You aren't contributing anything useful at all. I know the difference between “its” and “it's”, and this response does nothing to change the fact that I occasionally make errors by accident.

Replying doesn't help either

(yay for me being a hypocrite)

'17 rickoid

bf97b44a7fbd33db070f6ade2b7dc549

-Io-

Firedrake969 wrote:
CodeLegend wrote:
wizzwizz7 wrote:
CodeLegend wrote:
Yes, it is. So is “_”, since it's purpose isn't to output itself. (as compared to 0, 1, 2, etc., which are meant to output themselves)
*its
Please do stop. You aren't contributing anything useful at all. I know the difference between “its” and “it's”, and this response does nothing to change the fact that I occasionally make errors by accident.
Replying doesn't help either

(yay for me being a hypocrite)

It may.

It can correct the other person's behavior.

Discuss Scratch