Scratch Team Please See This

tdRaiders

@griffpatch has extra blocks. For example, he has

([ x] of [  Sprite])

We instead have

([ x position] of [  Sprite])

I tested it. They are not equal.

tdRaiders

tdRaiders wrote:
@griffpatch has extra blocks. For example, he has
([ x] of [  Sprite])
We instead have
([ x position] of [  Sprite])
I tested it. They are not equal.

There are probably more. Scratch Team, please look at this.

gdpr533f604550b2f20900645890

Griffpatch probably edited the project file externally. The “n of sprite” block is used in some exploits for more convenient programming, I believe.

tdRaiders

No, the block is actually x of sprite. No variables. Check some of his projects.

gdpr533f604550b2f20900645890

tdRaiders wrote:
No, the block is actually x of sprite. No variables. Check some of his projects.

When did I say that I disbelieved you?

scratchyone

tdRaiders wrote:
No, the block is actually x of sprite. No variables. Check some of his projects.

Then he is getting the var “x” from a Sprite. You can do that too.

Give me an internet

tdRaiders

The x of sprite is literally the x of sprite. For example, the x position of sprite may be 89. The x of sprite block may have the value of 778.484.

gdpr533f604550b2f20900645890

tdRaiders wrote:
The x of sprite is literally the x of sprite. For example, the x position of sprite may be 89. The x of sprite block may have the value of 778.484.

The sprite has a variable called “x” with that value, probably.

scratchyone

tdRaiders wrote:
The x of sprite is literally the x of sprite. For example, the x position of sprite may be 89. The x of sprite block may have the value of 778.484.

So the Sprite probably has a variable called “x”, and it's value is 778.484. Can I please have a link to a project with these blocks?

Edit: ninja'd

Last edited by scratchyone (May 23, 2016 00:16:53)

Give me an internet

tdRaiders

No, it is the blue sensing block. Check https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/23134940/

scratchyone

tdRaiders wrote:
No, it is the blue sensing block. Check https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/23134940/

Yes. We know. That block can get a variable belonging to another Sprite, too.

Give me an internet

tdRaiders

really???????????????????????????????????????????????

tdRaiders

Thank you for telling me that.

Learn something new every day… NOT

comp09

tdRaiders wrote:
really???????????????????????????????????????????????

Yep, it's a hidden “feature” in Scratch that we often (ab)use for reflection.

Visit the website of Andrew Sun!

gdpr533f604550b2f20900645890

tdRaiders wrote:
Thank you for telling me that.
Learn something new every day… NOT

Are you being sarcastic?

tdRaiders

You technically don't learn something everyday.

Jonathan50

comp09 wrote:
tdRaiders wrote:
really???????????????????????????????????????????????oooooooooooooooooo
Yep, it's a hidden “feature” in Scratch that we often (ab)use for reflection.

No, it isn't, it's a completely normal

([x v] of [Player v])

. See inside the project.

Not yet a Knight of the Mu Calculus.

tdRaiders

I've seen that already.

think [Griffpatch is not doing crazy things.] for (2) secs

Dylan5797

Jonathan50 wrote:
comp09 wrote:
tdRaiders wrote:
really???????????????????????????????????????????????oooooooooooooooooo
Yep, it's a hidden “feature” in Scratch that we often (ab)use for reflection.
No, it isn't, it's a completely normal
([x v] of [Player v])
. See inside the project.

lol, i better fix my userscript now :P
So if you create a private variable for a sprite, you can still access it from the of block, it is in the list.

Anyways, that would not be considered an extra block.

acorn166

tdRaiders wrote:
@griffpatch has extra blocks. For example, he has
([ x] of [  Sprite])
We instead have
([ x position] of [  Sprite])
I tested it. They are not equal.

it is easy to make it like this you just have to do extra stuff

Discuss Scratch