Yes, I've heard most about it. I read the rule Scratch Team follows that any projects with inappropriate FNAF content can only be unshared.

But, what if someone keeps sharing a project? It couldn't have any further action, since the rule says deleting or preventing sharing of the project is out of the Question, couldn't the user just reshare the project over and over again?

Yes, they could, though they would get many alerts, and if it continued, a ban.

Well, if the user kept sharing the project, it'd probably all add up to them being temporarily blocked.

the2000 wrote:

It couldn't have any further action, since the rule says deleting or preventing sharing of the project is out of the Question

Yes, but an exception could be made if necessary, surely? If they shared the project over and over, it would kind of be like sharing lots of different projects that aren't allowed. And when the project was unshared in the first place, that told the user they shouldn't share it again. So if they did, they'd be disobeying the ST.

There are rules for a reason, so if someone repeatedly breaks them, then they'll be blocked or even banned. In this case, it wouldn't matter that the whole reason they ended up breaking the rules in the first place was because they shared their inappropriate FNAF project over and over — it would just be viewed as them breaking the rules several times in a row. Does that make sense?

Note: I'm not the ST; this is just my opinion on the subject.

EDIT: Ninja'd because I spent so long writing this post.

-Spectrum wrote:

Well, if the user kept sharing the project, it'd probably all add up to them being temporarily blocked.

the2000 wrote:

It couldn't have any further action, since the rule says deleting or preventing sharing of the project is out of the Question

Yes, but an exception could be made if necessary, surely? If they shared the project over and over, it would kind of be like sharing lots of different projects that aren't allowed. And when the project was unshared in the first place, that told the user they shouldn't share it again. So if they did, they'd be disobeying the ST.

There are rules for a reason, so if someone repeatedly breaks them, then they'll be blocked or even banned. In this case, it wouldn't matter that the whole reason they ended up breaking the rules in the first place was because they shared their inappropriate FNAF project over and over — it would just be viewed as them breaking the rules several times in a row. Does that make sense?

Note: I'm not the ST; this is just my opinion on the subject.

EDIT: Ninja'd because I spent so long writing this post.

Abstract- wrote:

Yes, they could, though they would get many alerts, and if it continued, a ban.

ST could get sued - The rule specifically states no further action can be made.

the2000 wrote:

ST could get sued - The rule specifically states no further action can be made.

When someone has broke the rules many times, no matter what the rule that's being broken is, it's perfectly OK to do more than just unshare the project. What the rule means is that no further action can be made if the rule has been broken once. After it's been broken many times, then that becomes an entirely different situation.

-Spectrum wrote:

the2000 wrote:

ST could get sued - The rule specifically states no further action can be made.

When someone has broke the rules many times, no matter what the rule that's being broken is, it's perfectly OK to do more than just unshare the project. What the rule means is that no further action can be made if the rule has been broken once. After it's been broken many times, then that becomes an entirely different situation.

Well it should mention that then.