Discuss Scratch
- Discussion Forums
- » Suggestions
- » No 60 Second Rule for Trustworthy Scratchers
- giratina12
- Scratcher
100+ posts
No 60 Second Rule for Trustworthy Scratchers
I think we should have this because I am sure I'm not the only one who wants to reply very fast but can't because of this rule. I am managing 2 collabs and I really would like it if I could reply to everyone in a quick manner. I have never spammed in the forums and I have no intention of doing so in the future. I believe that if you lifted this rule for certain trustworthy Scratchers then it would make managing collabs easier and quicker. Please consider, and thank you for reading.
Hello! If you need help, just ask me on my homepage! I am good with quite a few things, and I can be a good friend!
- DotDash
- Scratcher
1000+ posts
No 60 Second Rule for Trustworthy Scratchers
certain trustworthy Scratchers then it would make managing collabs easier and quicker. Please consider, and thank you for reading.Will NEVER happen, the 60 second rule is there to prevent spam. I think we should have this because I am sure I'm not the only one who wants to reply very fast but can't because of this rule. I am managing 2 collabs and I really would like it if I could reply to everyone in a quick manner. I have never spammed in the forums and I have no intention of doing so in the future. I believe that if you lifted this rule for
My browser / operating system: MacOS Macintosh X 10.8.5, Chrome 29.0.1547.76, Flash 11.8 (release 800)
- dsaztur
- Scratcher
500+ posts
No 60 Second Rule for Trustworthy Scratchers
"Certain Trustworthy scratchers will never spam.certain trustworthy Scratchers then it would make managing collabs easier and quicker. Please consider, and thank you for reading.Will NEVER happen, the 60 second rule is there to prevent spam. I think we should have this because I am sure I'm not the only one who wants to reply very fast but can't because of this rule. I am managing 2 collabs and I really would like it if I could reply to everyone in a quick manner. I have never spammed in the forums and I have no intention of doing so in the future. I believe that if you lifted this rule for
no
- mitchboy
- Scratcher
1000+ posts
No 60 Second Rule for Trustworthy Scratchers
I'm sure that if the Scratch Team ever made a rank between Scratcher and Moderator, the rule would be shortened for them.
To be honest, it's not that much of a nuisance. I've only gotten it twice on these forums with over 500 posts.
To be honest, it's not that much of a nuisance. I've only gotten it twice on these forums with over 500 posts.
Capsicum annuum.
- giratina12
- Scratcher
100+ posts
No 60 Second Rule for Trustworthy Scratchers
Yep"Certain Trustworthy scratchers will never spam.certain trustworthy Scratchers then it would make managing collabs easier and quicker. Please consider, and thank you for reading.Will NEVER happen, the 60 second rule is there to prevent spam. I think we should have this because I am sure I'm not the only one who wants to reply very fast but can't because of this rule. I am managing 2 collabs and I really would like it if I could reply to everyone in a quick manner. I have never spammed in the forums and I have no intention of doing so in the future. I believe that if you lifted this rule for
Hello! If you need help, just ask me on my homepage! I am good with quite a few things, and I can be a good friend!
- giratina12
- Scratcher
100+ posts
No 60 Second Rule for Trustworthy Scratchers
Okay. But I am managing 2 collabs and in another one, plus now I have this forum topic so it is a lot of messages I have to type. I'm sure that if the Scratch Team ever made a rank between Scratcher and Moderator, the rule would be shortened for them.
To be honest, it's not that much of a nuisance. I've only gotten it twice on these forums with over 500 posts.
Hello! If you need help, just ask me on my homepage! I am good with quite a few things, and I can be a good friend!
- giratina12
- Scratcher
100+ posts
No 60 Second Rule for Trustworthy Scratchers
I know it is but like I said in bold print "certain trustworthy Scratchers". They would have to be trustworthy enough not to spam.certain trustworthy Scratchers then it would make managing collabs easier and quicker. Please consider, and thank you for reading.Will NEVER happen, the 60 second rule is there to prevent spam. I think we should have this because I am sure I'm not the only one who wants to reply very fast but can't because of this rule. I am managing 2 collabs and I really would like it if I could reply to everyone in a quick manner. I have never spammed in the forums and I have no intention of doing so in the future. I believe that if you lifted this rule for
Hello! If you need help, just ask me on my homepage! I am good with quite a few things, and I can be a good friend!
- powerpoint56
- Scratcher
1000+ posts
No 60 Second Rule for Trustworthy Scratchers
What defines “trustworthy”, then? Lots of things would have to be determined, and I highly doubt this will happen.
Sorry, don't support.
Sorry, don't support.
- mitchboy
- Scratcher
1000+ posts
No 60 Second Rule for Trustworthy Scratchers
You do realize you can quote more than one person per post, right? Just scroll up and quote them all at once. Like this:I know it is but like I said in bold print "certain trustworthy Scratchers". They would have to be trustworthy enough not to spam.certain trustworthy Scratchers then it would make managing collabs easier and quicker. Please consider, and thank you for reading.Will NEVER happen, the 60 second rule is there to prevent spam. I think we should have this because I am sure I'm not the only one who wants to reply very fast but can't because of this rule. I am managing 2 collabs and I really would like it if I could reply to everyone in a quick manner. I have never spammed in the forums and I have no intention of doing so in the future. I believe that if you lifted this rule for
What defines “trustworthy”, then? Lots of things would have to be determined, and I highly doubt this will happen.
Sorry, don't support.
certain trustworthy Scratchers then it would make managing collabs easier and quicker. Please consider, and thank you for reading.See? I think we should have this because I am sure I'm not the only one who wants to reply very fast but can't because of this rule. I am managing 2 collabs and I really would like it if I could reply to everyone in a quick manner. I have never spammed in the forums and I have no intention of doing so in the future. I believe that if you lifted this rule for
Capsicum annuum.
- giratina12
- Scratcher
100+ posts
No 60 Second Rule for Trustworthy Scratchers
I'm not asking for support. I am just telling the Scratch Team that this would be helpful. Also “trustworthy” would mean someone who has helped around the Scratch Community and have proved that they won't spam. What defines “trustworthy”, then? Lots of things would have to be determined, and I highly doubt this will happen.
Sorry, don't support.
Hello! If you need help, just ask me on my homepage! I am good with quite a few things, and I can be a good friend!
- giratina12
- Scratcher
100+ posts
No 60 Second Rule for Trustworthy Scratchers
I know you can. Thanks for trying to help !You do realize you can quote more than one person per post, right? Just scroll up and quote them all at once. Like this:I know it is but like I said in bold print "certain trustworthy Scratchers". They would have to be trustworthy enough not to spam.certain trustworthy Scratchers then it would make managing collabs easier and quicker. Please consider, and thank you for reading.Will NEVER happen, the 60 second rule is there to prevent spam. I think we should have this because I am sure I'm not the only one who wants to reply very fast but can't because of this rule. I am managing 2 collabs and I really would like it if I could reply to everyone in a quick manner. I have never spammed in the forums and I have no intention of doing so in the future. I believe that if you lifted this rule forWhat defines “trustworthy”, then? Lots of things would have to be determined, and I highly doubt this will happen.
Sorry, don't support.certain trustworthy Scratchers then it would make managing collabs easier and quicker. Please consider, and thank you for reading.See? I think we should have this because I am sure I'm not the only one who wants to reply very fast but can't because of this rule. I am managing 2 collabs and I really would like it if I could reply to everyone in a quick manner. I have never spammed in the forums and I have no intention of doing so in the future. I believe that if you lifted this rule for
Note: I had to wait 60 seconds for this post urg…
Hello! If you need help, just ask me on my homepage! I am good with quite a few things, and I can be a good friend!
- kayybee
- Scratcher
1000+ posts
No 60 Second Rule for Trustworthy Scratchers
Here's a hint: mitchboy told you that so you could quote both those posts in one post, so you wouldn't have to wait 60 seconds. He's trying to help, but it doesn't seem like you want it.I know you can. Thanks for trying to help !You do realize you can quote more than one person per post, right? Just scroll up and quote them all at once. Like this:I know it is but like I said in bold print "certain trustworthy Scratchers". They would have to be trustworthy enough not to spam.certain trustworthy Scratchers then it would make managing collabs easier and quicker. Please consider, and thank you for reading.Will NEVER happen, the 60 second rule is there to prevent spam. I think we should have this because I am sure I'm not the only one who wants to reply very fast but can't because of this rule. I am managing 2 collabs and I really would like it if I could reply to everyone in a quick manner. I have never spammed in the forums and I have no intention of doing so in the future. I believe that if you lifted this rule forWhat defines “trustworthy”, then? Lots of things would have to be determined, and I highly doubt this will happen.
Sorry, don't support.certain trustworthy Scratchers then it would make managing collabs easier and quicker. Please consider, and thank you for reading.See? I think we should have this because I am sure I'm not the only one who wants to reply very fast but can't because of this rule. I am managing 2 collabs and I really would like it if I could reply to everyone in a quick manner. I have never spammed in the forums and I have no intention of doing so in the future. I believe that if you lifted this rule for
Note: I had to wait 60 seconds for this post urg…
I'm pretty sure this wouldn't be a problem if you quoted and replied more than once per post.
That way, it takes more time to write a post, and you only have to write one to respond to everything in the collab.
Last edited by kayybee (Aug. 19, 2013 17:10:11)
- giratina12
- Scratcher
100+ posts
No 60 Second Rule for Trustworthy Scratchers
Well then what does He's trying to help, but it doesn't seem like you want it.
mean? Thanks for trying to help !
The problem is, that I have more then 1 collab. So I could use more than 1 quote at a time, but I have a few problems with it.
1. It might not be clear who I am talking to.
2. I am in more than 1 collab and I post very quickly.
3. Not as convenient as just doing one quote at a time.
4. When I “bump” my posts I do it quickly and I don't like having to wait 60 seconds.
Hello! If you need help, just ask me on my homepage! I am good with quite a few things, and I can be a good friend!
- chocolatepenguin
- Scratcher
1000+ posts
No 60 Second Rule for Trustworthy Scratchers
I don't like this idea.
Account hacked=MASSIVE ABUSE
Account hacked=MASSIVE ABUSE
- giratina12
- Scratcher
100+ posts
No 60 Second Rule for Trustworthy Scratchers
If an admin is hacked “MASSIVE ABUSE” can happen too but that rarely happens (if ever). Oh and you never responded on PokeIndustries but I was wondering why you quit? Could you please explain in that topic, thanks ! I don't like this idea.
Account hacked=MASSIVE ABUSE
Hello! If you need help, just ask me on my homepage! I am good with quite a few things, and I can be a good friend!
- chocolatepenguin
- Scratcher
1000+ posts
No 60 Second Rule for Trustworthy Scratchers
I quit pokeindustries because I was inactive and I wanted to restructure which collabs i am in.
- giratina12
- Scratcher
100+ posts
No 60 Second Rule for Trustworthy Scratchers
That would be good. How about limit it to 30 seconds? At least it compensates for problems caused by spamming by providing some time between posts.
Note: Had to wait 60 seconds for this post.
Hello! If you need help, just ask me on my homepage! I am good with quite a few things, and I can be a good friend!
- giratina12
- Scratcher
100+ posts
No 60 Second Rule for Trustworthy Scratchers
Restructure? So did you have other collabs prioritized over mine? Thanks for the name anyways. We'll give you credit for that and the Legendary Fakémon you thought of. Best of luck on your other collabs! Feel free to show me there finished products! Thanks for joining! I quit pokeindustries because I was inactive and I wanted to restructure which collabs i am in.
~giratina12
Hello! If you need help, just ask me on my homepage! I am good with quite a few things, and I can be a good friend!
- gregory9
- Scratcher
100+ posts
No 60 Second Rule for Trustworthy Scratchers
I Like that idea. But it probably will not happen.
Use DuckDuckGo instead of Google, Bing, or Yahoo
Check out Coursacado, and SBX Share!
I am gw90 on GitHub
- Discussion Forums
- » Suggestions
- » No 60 Second Rule for Trustworthy Scratchers