Discuss Scratch

giratina12
Scratcher
100+ posts

No 60 Second Rule for Trustworthy Scratchers

I think we should have this because I am sure I'm not the only one who wants to reply very fast but can't because of this rule. I am managing 2 collabs and I really would like it if I could reply to everyone in a quick manner. I have never spammed in the forums and I have no intention of doing so in the future. I believe that if you lifted this rule for certain trustworthy Scratchers then it would make managing collabs easier and quicker. Please consider, and thank you for reading.

Hello! If you need help, just ask me on my homepage! I am good with quite a few things, and I can be a good friend!
DotDash
Scratcher
1000+ posts

No 60 Second Rule for Trustworthy Scratchers

giratina12 wrote:

I think we should have this because I am sure I'm not the only one who wants to reply very fast but can't because of this rule. I am managing 2 collabs and I really would like it if I could reply to everyone in a quick manner. I have never spammed in the forums and I have no intention of doing so in the future. I believe that if you lifted this rule for certain trustworthy Scratchers then it would make managing collabs easier and quicker. Please consider, and thank you for reading.
Will NEVER happen, the 60 second rule is there to prevent spam.

My browser / operating system: MacOS Macintosh X 10.8.5, Chrome 29.0.1547.76, Flash 11.8 (release 800)
dsaztur
Scratcher
500+ posts

No 60 Second Rule for Trustworthy Scratchers

DotDash wrote:

giratina12 wrote:

I think we should have this because I am sure I'm not the only one who wants to reply very fast but can't because of this rule. I am managing 2 collabs and I really would like it if I could reply to everyone in a quick manner. I have never spammed in the forums and I have no intention of doing so in the future. I believe that if you lifted this rule for certain trustworthy Scratchers then it would make managing collabs easier and quicker. Please consider, and thank you for reading.
Will NEVER happen, the 60 second rule is there to prevent spam.
"Certain Trustworthy scratchers will never spam.

no
mitchboy
Scratcher
1000+ posts

No 60 Second Rule for Trustworthy Scratchers

I'm sure that if the Scratch Team ever made a rank between Scratcher and Moderator, the rule would be shortened for them.

To be honest, it's not that much of a nuisance. I've only gotten it twice on these forums with over 500 posts.

Capsicum annuum.
giratina12
Scratcher
100+ posts

No 60 Second Rule for Trustworthy Scratchers

dsaztur wrote:

DotDash wrote:

giratina12 wrote:

I think we should have this because I am sure I'm not the only one who wants to reply very fast but can't because of this rule. I am managing 2 collabs and I really would like it if I could reply to everyone in a quick manner. I have never spammed in the forums and I have no intention of doing so in the future. I believe that if you lifted this rule for certain trustworthy Scratchers then it would make managing collabs easier and quicker. Please consider, and thank you for reading.
Will NEVER happen, the 60 second rule is there to prevent spam.
"Certain Trustworthy scratchers will never spam.
Yep

Hello! If you need help, just ask me on my homepage! I am good with quite a few things, and I can be a good friend!
giratina12
Scratcher
100+ posts

No 60 Second Rule for Trustworthy Scratchers

mitchboy wrote:

I'm sure that if the Scratch Team ever made a rank between Scratcher and Moderator, the rule would be shortened for them.

To be honest, it's not that much of a nuisance. I've only gotten it twice on these forums with over 500 posts.
Okay. But I am managing 2 collabs and in another one, plus now I have this forum topic so it is a lot of messages I have to type.

Hello! If you need help, just ask me on my homepage! I am good with quite a few things, and I can be a good friend!
giratina12
Scratcher
100+ posts

No 60 Second Rule for Trustworthy Scratchers

DotDash wrote:

giratina12 wrote:

I think we should have this because I am sure I'm not the only one who wants to reply very fast but can't because of this rule. I am managing 2 collabs and I really would like it if I could reply to everyone in a quick manner. I have never spammed in the forums and I have no intention of doing so in the future. I believe that if you lifted this rule for certain trustworthy Scratchers then it would make managing collabs easier and quicker. Please consider, and thank you for reading.
Will NEVER happen, the 60 second rule is there to prevent spam.
I know it is but like I said in bold print "certain trustworthy Scratchers". They would have to be trustworthy enough not to spam.

Hello! If you need help, just ask me on my homepage! I am good with quite a few things, and I can be a good friend!
powerpoint56
Scratcher
1000+ posts

No 60 Second Rule for Trustworthy Scratchers

What defines “trustworthy”, then? Lots of things would have to be determined, and I highly doubt this will happen.

Sorry, don't support.


Explore, my Scratch mod | Car Crash | My projects | (image by @MicroMacro)
mitchboy
Scratcher
1000+ posts

No 60 Second Rule for Trustworthy Scratchers

giratina12 wrote:

DotDash wrote:

giratina12 wrote:

I think we should have this because I am sure I'm not the only one who wants to reply very fast but can't because of this rule. I am managing 2 collabs and I really would like it if I could reply to everyone in a quick manner. I have never spammed in the forums and I have no intention of doing so in the future. I believe that if you lifted this rule for certain trustworthy Scratchers then it would make managing collabs easier and quicker. Please consider, and thank you for reading.
Will NEVER happen, the 60 second rule is there to prevent spam.
I know it is but like I said in bold print "certain trustworthy Scratchers". They would have to be trustworthy enough not to spam.
You do realize you can quote more than one person per post, right? Just scroll up and quote them all at once. Like this:

powerpoint56 wrote:

What defines “trustworthy”, then? Lots of things would have to be determined, and I highly doubt this will happen.

Sorry, don't support.

giratina12 wrote:

I think we should have this because I am sure I'm not the only one who wants to reply very fast but can't because of this rule. I am managing 2 collabs and I really would like it if I could reply to everyone in a quick manner. I have never spammed in the forums and I have no intention of doing so in the future. I believe that if you lifted this rule for certain trustworthy Scratchers then it would make managing collabs easier and quicker. Please consider, and thank you for reading.
See?

Capsicum annuum.
giratina12
Scratcher
100+ posts

No 60 Second Rule for Trustworthy Scratchers

powerpoint56 wrote:

What defines “trustworthy”, then? Lots of things would have to be determined, and I highly doubt this will happen.

Sorry, don't support.
I'm not asking for support. I am just telling the Scratch Team that this would be helpful. Also “trustworthy” would mean someone who has helped around the Scratch Community and have proved that they won't spam.

Hello! If you need help, just ask me on my homepage! I am good with quite a few things, and I can be a good friend!
giratina12
Scratcher
100+ posts

No 60 Second Rule for Trustworthy Scratchers

mitchboy wrote:

giratina12 wrote:

DotDash wrote:

giratina12 wrote:

I think we should have this because I am sure I'm not the only one who wants to reply very fast but can't because of this rule. I am managing 2 collabs and I really would like it if I could reply to everyone in a quick manner. I have never spammed in the forums and I have no intention of doing so in the future. I believe that if you lifted this rule for certain trustworthy Scratchers then it would make managing collabs easier and quicker. Please consider, and thank you for reading.
Will NEVER happen, the 60 second rule is there to prevent spam.
I know it is but like I said in bold print "certain trustworthy Scratchers". They would have to be trustworthy enough not to spam.
You do realize you can quote more than one person per post, right? Just scroll up and quote them all at once. Like this:

powerpoint56 wrote:

What defines “trustworthy”, then? Lots of things would have to be determined, and I highly doubt this will happen.

Sorry, don't support.

giratina12 wrote:

I think we should have this because I am sure I'm not the only one who wants to reply very fast but can't because of this rule. I am managing 2 collabs and I really would like it if I could reply to everyone in a quick manner. I have never spammed in the forums and I have no intention of doing so in the future. I believe that if you lifted this rule for certain trustworthy Scratchers then it would make managing collabs easier and quicker. Please consider, and thank you for reading.
See?
I know you can. Thanks for trying to help !
Note: I had to wait 60 seconds for this post urg…

Hello! If you need help, just ask me on my homepage! I am good with quite a few things, and I can be a good friend!
kayybee
Scratcher
1000+ posts

No 60 Second Rule for Trustworthy Scratchers

giratina12 wrote:

mitchboy wrote:

giratina12 wrote:

DotDash wrote:

giratina12 wrote:

I think we should have this because I am sure I'm not the only one who wants to reply very fast but can't because of this rule. I am managing 2 collabs and I really would like it if I could reply to everyone in a quick manner. I have never spammed in the forums and I have no intention of doing so in the future. I believe that if you lifted this rule for certain trustworthy Scratchers then it would make managing collabs easier and quicker. Please consider, and thank you for reading.
Will NEVER happen, the 60 second rule is there to prevent spam.
I know it is but like I said in bold print "certain trustworthy Scratchers". They would have to be trustworthy enough not to spam.
You do realize you can quote more than one person per post, right? Just scroll up and quote them all at once. Like this:

powerpoint56 wrote:

What defines “trustworthy”, then? Lots of things would have to be determined, and I highly doubt this will happen.

Sorry, don't support.

giratina12 wrote:

I think we should have this because I am sure I'm not the only one who wants to reply very fast but can't because of this rule. I am managing 2 collabs and I really would like it if I could reply to everyone in a quick manner. I have never spammed in the forums and I have no intention of doing so in the future. I believe that if you lifted this rule for certain trustworthy Scratchers then it would make managing collabs easier and quicker. Please consider, and thank you for reading.
See?
I know you can. Thanks for trying to help !
Note: I had to wait 60 seconds for this post urg…
Here's a hint: mitchboy told you that so you could quote both those posts in one post, so you wouldn't have to wait 60 seconds. He's trying to help, but it doesn't seem like you want it.
I'm pretty sure this wouldn't be a problem if you quoted and replied more than once per post.
That way, it takes more time to write a post, and you only have to write one to respond to everything in the collab.

Last edited by kayybee (Aug. 19, 2013 17:10:11)

giratina12
Scratcher
100+ posts

No 60 Second Rule for Trustworthy Scratchers

kayybee wrote:

He's trying to help, but it doesn't seem like you want it.
Well then what does

giratina12 wrote:

Thanks for trying to help !
mean?
The problem is, that I have more then 1 collab. So I could use more than 1 quote at a time, but I have a few problems with it.
1. It might not be clear who I am talking to.
2. I am in more than 1 collab and I post very quickly.
3. Not as convenient as just doing one quote at a time.
4. When I “bump” my posts I do it quickly and I don't like having to wait 60 seconds.

Hello! If you need help, just ask me on my homepage! I am good with quite a few things, and I can be a good friend!
chocolatepenguin
Scratcher
1000+ posts

No 60 Second Rule for Trustworthy Scratchers

I don't like this idea.
Account hacked=MASSIVE ABUSE

giratina12
Scratcher
100+ posts

No 60 Second Rule for Trustworthy Scratchers

chocolatepenguin wrote:

I don't like this idea.
Account hacked=MASSIVE ABUSE
If an admin is hacked “MASSIVE ABUSE” can happen too but that rarely happens (if ever). Oh and you never responded on PokeIndustries but I was wondering why you quit? Could you please explain in that topic, thanks !

Hello! If you need help, just ask me on my homepage! I am good with quite a few things, and I can be a good friend!
ProdigyZeta7
Scratcher
1000+ posts

No 60 Second Rule for Trustworthy Scratchers

How about limit it to 30 seconds? At least it compensates for problems caused by spamming by providing some time between posts.



chocolatepenguin
Scratcher
1000+ posts

No 60 Second Rule for Trustworthy Scratchers

I quit pokeindustries because I was inactive and I wanted to restructure which collabs i am in.

giratina12
Scratcher
100+ posts

No 60 Second Rule for Trustworthy Scratchers

ProdigyZeta7 wrote:

How about limit it to 30 seconds? At least it compensates for problems caused by spamming by providing some time between posts.
That would be good.
Note: Had to wait 60 seconds for this post.

Hello! If you need help, just ask me on my homepage! I am good with quite a few things, and I can be a good friend!
giratina12
Scratcher
100+ posts

No 60 Second Rule for Trustworthy Scratchers

chocolatepenguin wrote:

I quit pokeindustries because I was inactive and I wanted to restructure which collabs i am in.
Restructure? So did you have other collabs prioritized over mine? Thanks for the name anyways. We'll give you credit for that and the Legendary Fakémon you thought of. Best of luck on your other collabs! Feel free to show me there finished products! Thanks for joining!
~giratina12

Hello! If you need help, just ask me on my homepage! I am good with quite a few things, and I can be a good friend!
gregory9
Scratcher
100+ posts

No 60 Second Rule for Trustworthy Scratchers

I Like that idea. But it probably will not happen.

Use DuckDuckGo instead of Google, Bing, or Yahoo

Check out Coursacado, and SBX Share!

I am gw90 on GitHub

Powered by DjangoBB

Standard | Mobile