Not that hard with jQuery AJAX and loops xD Probably should be patched unless we want *real* AE studios.

edit - ogod http://prntscr.com/76dmeh I'll just stop now…

Well that's nice.

Quite.

Ninja'd by several months. Except my script was for legit purposes

Some manager dude deleted most projects and curators from a front-pages Beatles studio a while back, so I wrote a script to read activity logs and add them all back.

MegaApuTurkUltra wrote:

Ninja'd by several months. Except my script was for legit purposes

Some manager dude deleted most projects and curators from a front-pages Beatles studio a while back, so I wrote a script to read activity logs and add them all back.

That's awesome.

LOL looks like paddle2see sent you a “cease and desist” comment there. +1 on the “AT'er being busted by ST member for doing something harmless” meter! I think it's on 3 - kaj comments, comp09's test account, this!

ChocolatePi wrote:

LOL looks like paddle2see sent you a “cease and desist” comment there. +1 on the “AT'er being busted by ST member for doing something harmless” meter! I think it's on 3 - kaj comments, comp09's test account, this!

What comment?

MegaApuTurkUltra wrote:

ChocolatePi wrote:

LOL looks like paddle2see sent you a “cease and desist” comment there. +1 on the “AT'er being busted by ST member for doing something harmless” meter! I think it's on 3 - kaj comments, comp09's test account, this!

What comment?

I think he means this one: https://scratch.mit.edu/studios/1231860/comments/#comments-12050712

@ChocolatePi - I wouldn't call it harmless. If the Scratch Team thinks it's harmful, it quite possibly is.

Superdoggy wrote:

MegaApuTurkUltra wrote:

ChocolatePi wrote:

LOL looks like paddle2see sent you a “cease and desist” comment there. +1 on the “AT'er being busted by ST member for doing something harmless” meter! I think it's on 3 - kaj comments, comp09's test account, this!

What comment?

I think he means this one: https://scratch.mit.edu/studios/1231860/comments/#comments-12050712

@ChocolatePi - I wouldn't call it harmless. If the Scratch Team thinks it's harmful, it quite possibly is.

I agree. It does place unnecessary load on scratch servers. That's also why comp09's test account was warned.

We tried this once. We got up to a few tens of thousands of projects. It was back during the AT drama, so we even had a sentiment analyser that would detect “unhappy” or “happy” comments, and remove or add all of that user's projects, respectively.

The ST noticed. It added unnecessary bloat to their project–studio relation table! So we had to delete it. It was an interesting social experiment though

blob8108 wrote:

We tried this once. We got up to a few tens of thousands of projects. It was back during the AT drama, so we even had a sentiment analyser that would detect “unhappy” or “happy” comments, and remove or add all of that user's projects, respectively.

The ST noticed. It added unnecessary bloat to their project–studio relation table! So we had to delete it. It was an interesting social experiment though

You mean AE drama, right?

Anyway, lol, I remember. MathWizz was the studio owner, right?

This is where having a local install of ScratchR2 would be helpful.

*hint*hint*nudge*nudge*

MegaApuTurkUltra wrote:

Superdoggy wrote:

MegaApuTurkUltra wrote:

ChocolatePi wrote:

LOL looks like paddle2see sent you a “cease and desist” comment there. +1 on the “AT'er being busted by ST member for doing something harmless” meter! I think it's on 3 - kaj comments, comp09's test account, this!

What comment?

I think he means this one: https://scratch.mit.edu/studios/1231860/comments/#comments-12050712

@ChocolatePi - I wouldn't call it harmless. If the Scratch Team thinks it's harmful, it quite possibly is.

I agree. It does place unnecessary load on scratch servers. That's also why comp09's test account was warned.

I guess you're right - the AT people kind of treat the servers as our playground, like Paddle2See once said

Maybe we should stop messing with the APIs (or at least sending bulk requests)

Superdoggy wrote:

You mean AE drama, right?

Anyway, lol, I remember. MathWizz was the studio owner, right?

Yes and yes.

blob8108 wrote:

We tried this once. We got up to a few tens of thousands of projects. It was back during the AT drama, so we even had a sentiment analyzer that would detect “unhappy” or “happy” comments, and remove or add all of that user's projects, respectively.

The ST noticed. It added unnecessary bloat to their project–studio relation table! So we had to delete it. It was an interesting social experiment though

Ah yes, I remember that studio. The sentiment analyzer was really cool.

Thepuzzlegame wrote:

The sentiment analyzer was really cool.

Thank you! Though it was basically just a simple Bayesian spam filter

I've jumped on the bandwagon of simple signatures

Nope, that's not simple enough

blob8108 wrote:

I've jumped on the bandwagon of simple signatures

Nope, that's not simple enough

I'll just remove my signature altogether, then no one will have a signature simpler than mine xD

Jk, I like my huge signature

Wow. I once tried to do this but canceled it because I wanted to keep my “Alerts” section clean (I only have two alerts so far, one is a false alert, and one is a nicey-nicey not-really-an-alert-but-a-private-message) And I'm glad I did. I should experiment with “useful” stuff instead.. Like MAPU's nice example XD

Rumanti wrote:

Like MAPU's nice example XD

Who's that?