Remixing turned off has been “no” for a long time.

Also, screen captures? Sound recorders? Looking at a script and manually copying it?

You cant stop that if someone implimented the feature

No so sure I support… mainly due to the share in the Scratch motto. Great idea, though.

Even if they wanted to implement this, they couldn't. It is against the law. Their license states that the source is open and editable/redistrobutable, and Scratch can't change the licenses. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/legalcode

gravtest wrote:

Even if they wanted to implement this, they couldn't. It is against the law. Their license states that the source is open and editable/redistrobutable, and Scratch can't change the licenses. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/legalcode

Yes, some of the first sections say

“2. Fair Dealing Rights. Nothing in this License is intended to reduce, limit, or restrict any uses free from copyright or rights arising from limitations or exceptions that are provided for in connection with the copyright protection under copyright law or other applicable laws.

3. License Grant. Subject to the terms and conditions of this License, Licensor hereby grants You a worldwide, royalty-free, non-exclusive, perpetual (for the duration of the applicable copyright) license to exercise the rights in the Work as stated below:

a. to Reproduce the Work, to incorporate the Work into one or more Collections, and to Reproduce the Work as incorporated in the Collections;

b. to create and Reproduce Adaptations provided that any such Adaptation, including any translation in any medium, takes reasonable steps to clearly label, demarcate or otherwise identify that changes were made to the original Work. For example, a translation could be marked ”The original work was translated from English to Spanish,“ or a modification could indicate ”The original work has been modified.“;

c. to Distribute and Publicly Perform the Work including as incorporated in Collections; and,

d. to Distribute and Publicly Perform Adaptations.”

dvd4 wrote:

jh1234l wrote:

All the “Do NOT remix!!!!” on projects have no legal meaning, because by sharing scratch projects, you agree to make it under Creative Commons Share alike.

Of course it gas no legal meaning.

But it does have a moral one. For example, only a dishonest person would remix it.

Wrong.

I'm very honest, and I would probably remix it to teach the person a lesson on one of the many things that Scratch is about.

mathfreak231 wrote:

dvd4 wrote:

jh1234l wrote:

All the “Do NOT remix!!!!” on projects have no legal meaning, because by sharing scratch projects, you agree to make it under Creative Commons Share alike.

Of course it gas no legal meaning.

But it does have a moral one. For example, only a dishonest person would remix it.

Wrong.

I'm very honest, and I would probably remix it to teach the person a lesson on one of the many things that Scratch is about.

*thumbs up*

mathfreak231 wrote:

dvd4 wrote:

jh1234l wrote:

All the “Do NOT remix!!!!” on projects have no legal meaning, because by sharing scratch projects, you agree to make it under Creative Commons Share alike.

Of course it gas no legal meaning.

But it does have a moral one. For example, only a dishonest person would remix it.

Wrong.

I'm very honest, and I would probably remix it to teach the person a lesson on one of the many things that Scratch is about.

Me too xD
(of course w/credit and some small changes for legality)

Remixing is a core part of Scratch. No support.

No support