JoeyTheChicken wrote:

Critic2100 wrote:

JoeyTheChicken wrote:

Critic2100 wrote:

JoeyTheChicken wrote:

Critic2100 wrote:

JoeyTheChicken wrote:

I think it's funny how you never realize how bad your projects are until you get to the next rung… My latest project, Falling Horace 2, just looks like a disaster. I spent a lot of work on it, but the gameplay is uninteresting and it lagged a lot, as I was a big fan of forever loops then. Point is, we believe our projects are good when they're not. There's always room for improvement. Even at the top. So maybe they're good, just not as good as we think.

Yeah. Ever since Critic OS v. 1.1 came out, I've been noticing how undeveloped Critic OS v. 1.0 is, and I was really happy with it in the beginning.

The weird ways of the world… At least it's good to know we're always improving

Yeah. I'm pretty sure once Critic OS v. 1.2 comes out, I'll be thinking, “I really thought v. 1.1 was good?”

;D Probably. Also, why is OS-making such a big thing on Scratch? Wondering I bet I'll look back at this huge collab one day and just go… okay.

Yeah. I think that there are about 5 collabs making OS's, and two or three people I'm in a collab with are also making OS's. I'm actually in a collab that's making an OS. .

Haha ^~^ That's a big OS party

Yeah.

JoeyTheChicken wrote:

I think it's funny how you never realize how bad your projects are until you get to the next rung… My latest project, Falling Horace 2, just looks like a disaster. I spent a lot of work on it, but the gameplay is uninteresting and it lagged a lot, as I was a big fan of forever loops then. Point is, we believe our projects are good when they're not. There's always room for improvement. Even at the top. So maybe they're good, just not as good as we think.

Yes, exactly! My earlier projects are terrible, but at the time I thought they were really good. I'm making better stuff now that I feel aren't bad, but there are still many things I could improve upon.

Critic2100 wrote:

JoeyTheChicken wrote:

Critic2100 wrote:

JoeyTheChicken wrote:

Critic2100 wrote:

JoeyTheChicken wrote:

Critic2100 wrote:

JoeyTheChicken wrote:

I think it's funny how you never realize how bad your projects are until you get to the next rung… My latest project, Falling Horace 2, just looks like a disaster. I spent a lot of work on it, but the gameplay is uninteresting and it lagged a lot, as I was a big fan of forever loops then. Point is, we believe our projects are good when they're not. There's always room for improvement. Even at the top. So maybe they're good, just not as good as we think.

Yeah. Ever since Critic OS v. 1.1 came out, I've been noticing how undeveloped Critic OS v. 1.0 is, and I was really happy with it in the beginning.

The weird ways of the world… At least it's good to know we're always improving

Yeah. I'm pretty sure once Critic OS v. 1.2 comes out, I'll be thinking, “I really thought v. 1.1 was good?”

;D Probably. Also, why is OS-making such a big thing on Scratch? Wondering I bet I'll look back at this huge collab one day and just go… okay.

Yeah. I think that there are about 5 collabs making OS's, and two or three people I'm in a collab with are also making OS's. I'm actually in a collab that's making an OS. .

Haha ^~^ That's a big OS party

Yeah.

Haha ^~^ I'll never understand you people

Prinseskat wrote:

JoeyTheChicken wrote:

I think it's funny how you never realize how bad your projects are until you get to the next rung… My latest project, Falling Horace 2, just looks like a disaster. I spent a lot of work on it, but the gameplay is uninteresting and it lagged a lot, as I was a big fan of forever loops then. Point is, we believe our projects are good when they're not. There's always room for improvement. Even at the top. So maybe they're good, just not as good as we think.

Yes, exactly! My earlier projects are terrible, but at the time I thought they were really good. I'm making better stuff now that I feel aren't bad, but there are still many things I could improve upon.

Preach it :3 My alt, GroundyandSkyah, is pretty much made of stuff I thought was good at the time. I moved it all.

THERE HAS BEEN A HUGE MISUNDERSTANDING.

You all seem to think I'm some popular scratcher who is whining about fame. This is not so. I am merely commenting on the way that people peak around my level. I used myself as an example- and I'm not really a good example. Sorry.

Also, it's quite annoying how some people ( (removed by moderator - please keep it general) ) seem to be using this as a place to chat. THIS IS A FORUM POST WITH THE GOAL OF: Letting scratcher become more popular and not have to peak by changing featured project restrictions. End of story.

WillboSwaggins wrote:

THERE HAS BEEN A HUGE MISUNDERSTANDING.

You all seem to think I'm some popular scratcher who is whining about fame. This is not so. I am merely commenting on the way that people peak around my level. I used myself as an example- and I'm not really a good example. Sorry.

Also, it's quite annoying how some people ( (removed by moderator - please keep it general) ) seem to be using this as a place to chat. THIS IS A FORUM POST WITH THE GOAL OF: Letting scratcher become more popular and not have to peak by changing featured project restrictions. End of story.

Oh, sorry.

JoeyTheChicken wrote:

Critic2100 wrote:

JoeyTheChicken wrote:

Critic2100 wrote:

JoeyTheChicken wrote:

Critic2100 wrote:

JoeyTheChicken wrote:

Critic2100 wrote:

JoeyTheChicken wrote:

I think it's funny how you never realize how bad your projects are until you get to the next rung… My latest project, Falling Horace 2, just looks like a disaster. I spent a lot of work on it, but the gameplay is uninteresting and it lagged a lot, as I was a big fan of forever loops then. Point is, we believe our projects are good when they're not. There's always room for improvement. Even at the top. So maybe they're good, just not as good as we think.

Yeah. Ever since Critic OS v. 1.1 came out, I've been noticing how undeveloped Critic OS v. 1.0 is, and I was really happy with it in the beginning.

The weird ways of the world… At least it's good to know we're always improving

Yeah. I'm pretty sure once Critic OS v. 1.2 comes out, I'll be thinking, “I really thought v. 1.1 was good?”

;D Probably. Also, why is OS-making such a big thing on Scratch? Wondering I bet I'll look back at this huge collab one day and just go… okay.

Yeah. I think that there are about 5 collabs making OS's, and two or three people I'm in a collab with are also making OS's. I'm actually in a collab that's making an OS. .

Haha ^~^ That's a big OS party

Yeah.

Haha ^~^ I'll never understand you people

If you want to keep on talking, please go to my profile. Thanks.

WillboSwaggins wrote:

THERE HAS BEEN A HUGE MISUNDERSTANDING.

You all seem to think I'm some popular scratcher who is whining about fame. This is not so. I am merely commenting on the way that people peak around my level. I used myself as an example- and I'm not really a good example. Sorry.

Also, it's quite annoying how some people (*cough* JoeyTheChicken *cough* Critic2100 *cough* ChocolatePi) seem to be using this as a place to chat. THIS IS A FORUM POST WITH THE GOAL OF: Letting scratcher become more popular and not have to peak by changing featured project restrictions. End of story.

Woah, chill! Paddle and the Team are talking about it. Are we allowed to have a discussion? I mean, it says *discussion* forums right up there ^^^

We just wanna discuss Scratch… It's a discussion, not posting super NFE content in some black market studio of projects that hate on New Scratchers…

(I should have come up with something funnier for Scratch black markets Oh well. Maybe they'd have card dealers)

:3

Critic2100 wrote:

WillboSwaggins wrote:

THERE HAS BEEN A HUGE MISUNDERSTANDING.

You all seem to think I'm some popular scratcher who is whining about fame. This is not so. I am merely commenting on the way that people peak around my level. I used myself as an example- and I'm not really a good example. Sorry.

Also, it's quite annoying how some people (*cough* JoeyTheChicken *cough* Critic2100 *cough* ChocolatePi) seem to be using this as a place to chat. THIS IS A FORUM POST WITH THE GOAL OF: Letting scratcher become more popular and not have to peak by changing featured project restrictions. End of story.

Oh, sorry.

JoeyTheChicken wrote:

Critic2100 wrote:

JoeyTheChicken wrote:

Critic2100 wrote:

JoeyTheChicken wrote:

Critic2100 wrote:

JoeyTheChicken wrote:

Critic2100 wrote:

JoeyTheChicken wrote:

I think it's funny how you never realize how bad your projects are until you get to the next rung… My latest project, Falling Horace 2, just looks like a disaster. I spent a lot of work on it, but the gameplay is uninteresting and it lagged a lot, as I was a big fan of forever loops then. Point is, we believe our projects are good when they're not. There's always room for improvement. Even at the top. So maybe they're good, just not as good as we think.

Yeah. Ever since Critic OS v. 1.1 came out, I've been noticing how undeveloped Critic OS v. 1.0 is, and I was really happy with it in the beginning.

The weird ways of the world… At least it's good to know we're always improving

Yeah. I'm pretty sure once Critic OS v. 1.2 comes out, I'll be thinking, “I really thought v. 1.1 was good?”

;D Probably. Also, why is OS-making such a big thing on Scratch? Wondering I bet I'll look back at this huge collab one day and just go… okay.

Yeah. I think that there are about 5 collabs making OS's, and two or three people I'm in a collab with are also making OS's. I'm actually in a collab that's making an OS. .

Haha ^~^ That's a big OS party

Yeah.

Haha ^~^ I'll never understand you people

If you want to keep on talking, please go to my profile. Thanks.

Thank you. This is not a chat room.

WillboSwaggins wrote:

THERE HAS BEEN A HUGE MISUNDERSTANDING.

You all seem to think I'm some popular scratcher who is whining about fame. This is not so. I am merely commenting on the way that people peak around my level. I used myself as an example- and I'm not really a good example. Sorry.

Also, it's quite annoying how some people (*cough* JoeyTheChicken *cough* Critic2100 *cough* ChocolatePi) seem to be using this as a place to chat. THIS IS A FORUM POST WITH THE GOAL OF: Letting scratcher become more popular and not have to peak by changing featured project restrictions. End of story.

WillboSwaggins wrote:

Message to everybody: Thank you very much for hating on my character, projects, and ideas. So as of now, I will no longer post on this discussion. So feel free to judge and hate on me from this point forward.

Okay…

Truth is, you do seem to be a popular Scratcher who is whining about fame. You have gotten more twice as much followers in a few months than I have in a year and few months. You have gotten front paged many times. However, you still want a project featured/curated when there is no real reason for that to happen.
Second part: this isn't used as a “place to chat”, we're trying to tell you exactly what I said above. We're talking about why this isn't needed, why you should actually be happy with being popular instead of trying to be Griffpatch.

JoeyTheChicken wrote:

WillboSwaggins wrote:

THERE HAS BEEN A HUGE MISUNDERSTANDING.

You all seem to think I'm some popular scratcher who is whining about fame. This is not so. I am merely commenting on the way that people peak around my level. I used myself as an example- and I'm not really a good example. Sorry.

Also, it's quite annoying how some people (*cough* JoeyTheChicken *cough* Critic2100 *cough* ChocolatePi) seem to be using this as a place to chat. THIS IS A FORUM POST WITH THE GOAL OF: Letting scratcher become more popular and not have to peak by changing featured project restrictions. End of story.

Woah, chill! Paddle and the Team are talking about it. Are we allowed to have a discussion? I mean, it says *discussion* forums right up there ^^^

We just wanna discuss Scratch… It's a discussion, not posting super NFE content in some black market studio of projects that hate on New Scratchers…

(I should have come up with something funnier for Scratch black markets Oh well. Maybe they'd have card dealers)

:3

People are having discussions about OS-es (not really sure if that's the plural)! They take up an entire page!

WillboSwaggins wrote:

Critic2100 wrote:

WillboSwaggins wrote:

THERE HAS BEEN A HUGE MISUNDERSTANDING.

You all seem to think I'm some popular scratcher who is whining about fame. This is not so. I am merely commenting on the way that people peak around my level. I used myself as an example- and I'm not really a good example. Sorry.

Also, it's quite annoying how some people (*cough* JoeyTheChicken *cough* Critic2100 *cough* ChocolatePi) seem to be using this as a place to chat. THIS IS A FORUM POST WITH THE GOAL OF: Letting scratcher become more popular and not have to peak by changing featured project restrictions. End of story.

Oh, sorry.

JoeyTheChicken wrote:

Critic2100 wrote:

JoeyTheChicken wrote:

Critic2100 wrote:

JoeyTheChicken wrote:

Critic2100 wrote:

JoeyTheChicken wrote:

Critic2100 wrote:

JoeyTheChicken wrote:

I think it's funny how you never realize how bad your projects are until you get to the next rung… My latest project, Falling Horace 2, just looks like a disaster. I spent a lot of work on it, but the gameplay is uninteresting and it lagged a lot, as I was a big fan of forever loops then. Point is, we believe our projects are good when they're not. There's always room for improvement. Even at the top. So maybe they're good, just not as good as we think.

Yeah. Ever since Critic OS v. 1.1 came out, I've been noticing how undeveloped Critic OS v. 1.0 is, and I was really happy with it in the beginning.

The weird ways of the world… At least it's good to know we're always improving

Yeah. I'm pretty sure once Critic OS v. 1.2 comes out, I'll be thinking, “I really thought v. 1.1 was good?”

;D Probably. Also, why is OS-making such a big thing on Scratch? Wondering I bet I'll look back at this huge collab one day and just go… okay.

Yeah. I think that there are about 5 collabs making OS's, and two or three people I'm in a collab with are also making OS's. I'm actually in a collab that's making an OS. .

Haha ^~^ That's a big OS party

Yeah.

Haha ^~^ I'll never understand you people

If you want to keep on talking, please go to my profile. Thanks.

Thank you. This is not a chat room.

uou Gosh, I'll go, but I still want a piece of that cake

Prinseskat wrote:

WillboSwaggins wrote:

THERE HAS BEEN A HUGE MISUNDERSTANDING.

You all seem to think I'm some popular scratcher who is whining about fame. This is not so. I am merely commenting on the way that people peak around my level. I used myself as an example- and I'm not really a good example. Sorry.

Also, it's quite annoying how some people (*cough* JoeyTheChicken *cough* Critic2100 *cough* ChocolatePi) seem to be using this as a place to chat. THIS IS A FORUM POST WITH THE GOAL OF: Letting scratcher become more popular and not have to peak by changing featured project restrictions. End of story.

WillboSwaggins wrote:

Message to everybody: Thank you very much for hating on my character, projects, and ideas. So as of now, I will no longer post on this discussion. So feel free to judge and hate on me from this point forward.

Okay…

Truth is, you do seem to be a popular Scratcher who is whining about fame. You have gotten more twice as much followers in a few months than I have in a year and few months. You have gotten front paged many times. However, you still want a project featured/curated when there is no real reason for that to happen.
Second part: this isn't used as a “place to chat”, we're trying to tell you exactly what I said above. We're talking about why this isn't needed, why you should actually be happy with being popular instead of trying to be Griffpatch.

Tell that to the 50 comments about OS's. Also, I am happy with being popular, I just feel that so many scratcher peak where I am, and because of the way the site is set up, we can't get more popular. It's frustrating, is all. And if that sounds like whining to you, IT'S NOT. It's merely me stating my opinions.

WillboSwaggins wrote:

Prinseskat wrote:

WillboSwaggins wrote:

THERE HAS BEEN A HUGE MISUNDERSTANDING.

You all seem to think I'm some popular scratcher who is whining about fame. This is not so. I am merely commenting on the way that people peak around my level. I used myself as an example- and I'm not really a good example. Sorry.

Also, it's quite annoying how some people (*cough* JoeyTheChicken *cough* Critic2100 *cough* ChocolatePi) seem to be using this as a place to chat. THIS IS A FORUM POST WITH THE GOAL OF: Letting scratcher become more popular and not have to peak by changing featured project restrictions. End of story.

WillboSwaggins wrote:

Message to everybody: Thank you very much for hating on my character, projects, and ideas. So as of now, I will no longer post on this discussion. So feel free to judge and hate on me from this point forward.

Okay…

Truth is, you do seem to be a popular Scratcher who is whining about fame. You have gotten more twice as much followers in a few months than I have in a year and few months. You have gotten front paged many times. However, you still want a project featured/curated when there is no real reason for that to happen.
Second part: this isn't used as a “place to chat”, we're trying to tell you exactly what I said above. We're talking about why this isn't needed, why you should actually be happy with being popular instead of trying to be Griffpatch.

Tell that to the 50 comments about OS's. Also, I am happy with being popular, I just feel that so many scratcher peak where I am, and because of the way the site is set up, we can't get more popular. It's frustrating, is all. And if that sounds like whining to you, IT'S NOT. It's merely me stating my opinions.

But that's the thing! You can't justify yourself by saying it's not whining .-.

JoeyTheChicken wrote:

WillboSwaggins wrote:

Prinseskat wrote:

WillboSwaggins wrote:

THERE HAS BEEN A HUGE MISUNDERSTANDING.

You all seem to think I'm some popular scratcher who is whining about fame. This is not so. I am merely commenting on the way that people peak around my level. I used myself as an example- and I'm not really a good example. Sorry.

Also, it's quite annoying how some people (*cough* JoeyTheChicken *cough* Critic2100 *cough* ChocolatePi) seem to be using this as a place to chat. THIS IS A FORUM POST WITH THE GOAL OF: Letting scratcher become more popular and not have to peak by changing featured project restrictions. End of story.

WillboSwaggins wrote:

Message to everybody: Thank you very much for hating on my character, projects, and ideas. So as of now, I will no longer post on this discussion. So feel free to judge and hate on me from this point forward.

Okay…

Truth is, you do seem to be a popular Scratcher who is whining about fame. You have gotten more twice as much followers in a few months than I have in a year and few months. You have gotten front paged many times. However, you still want a project featured/curated when there is no real reason for that to happen.
Second part: this isn't used as a “place to chat”, we're trying to tell you exactly what I said above. We're talking about why this isn't needed, why you should actually be happy with being popular instead of trying to be Griffpatch.

Tell that to the 50 comments about OS's. Also, I am happy with being popular, I just feel that so many scratcher peak where I am, and because of the way the site is set up, we can't get more popular. It's frustrating, is all. And if that sounds like whining to you, IT'S NOT. It's merely me stating my opinions.

But that's the thing! You can't justify yourself by saying it's not whining .-.

Whining is: 'complaining in a feeble and petulant way," according to google. I am complaining, yes, but about an issue that I feel strongly about. There is nothing feeble or petulant about my arguments. What is feeble and petulant is the way people spent a dozen or more forum posts calling me a horrible person, a hypocrite, and accusing me of being popular (as if it was a bad thing.)

WillboSwaggins wrote:

JoeyTheChicken wrote:

WillboSwaggins wrote:

Prinseskat wrote:

WillboSwaggins wrote:

THERE HAS BEEN A HUGE MISUNDERSTANDING.

You all seem to think I'm some popular scratcher who is whining about fame. This is not so. I am merely commenting on the way that people peak around my level. I used myself as an example- and I'm not really a good example. Sorry.

Also, it's quite annoying how some people (*cough* JoeyTheChicken *cough* Critic2100 *cough* ChocolatePi) seem to be using this as a place to chat. THIS IS A FORUM POST WITH THE GOAL OF: Letting scratcher become more popular and not have to peak by changing featured project restrictions. End of story.

WillboSwaggins wrote:

Message to everybody: Thank you very much for hating on my character, projects, and ideas. So as of now, I will no longer post on this discussion. So feel free to judge and hate on me from this point forward.

Okay…

Truth is, you do seem to be a popular Scratcher who is whining about fame. You have gotten more twice as much followers in a few months than I have in a year and few months. You have gotten front paged many times. However, you still want a project featured/curated when there is no real reason for that to happen.
Second part: this isn't used as a “place to chat”, we're trying to tell you exactly what I said above. We're talking about why this isn't needed, why you should actually be happy with being popular instead of trying to be Griffpatch.

Tell that to the 50 comments about OS's. Also, I am happy with being popular, I just feel that so many scratcher peak where I am, and because of the way the site is set up, we can't get more popular. It's frustrating, is all. And if that sounds like whining to you, IT'S NOT. It's merely me stating my opinions.

But that's the thing! You can't justify yourself by saying it's not whining .-.

Whining is: 'complaining in a feeble and petulant way," according to google. I am complaining, yes, but about an issue that I feel strongly about. There is nothing feeble or petulant about my arguments. What is feeble and petulant is the way people spent a dozen or more forum posts calling me a horrible person, a hypocrite, and accusing me of being popular (as if it was a bad thing.)

That's not the point. I understand your kind of personality. I just think you should try to become a better, more accepting person. Lower the guard, take off the “swag” and just join the swimming world of people. They're all just like you.

I'm not going to argue with you about my character. So please, if you see an issue with my SUGGESTION, feel free to keep commenting. If you see an issue with my CHARACTER/PERSONALITY, do not comment.

Hmm, this thread is on the road of devolving; I think it's time to lock the thread. Whatever adjustments, if necessary, would be the decision of the ST, and I think us ST members can discuss this on our own.

WillboSwaggins wrote:

Paddle2See wrote:

Suggestions is not for ranting.

Do you have a concrete suggestion? Or should we close this now?

My concrete suggestion is to make it easier for scratchers who are semi-popular or popular to achieve more success in getting their projects views. Like Scratchifier said: drop the 1-week requirement, and increase the max love count from 40 to 60. This would make it easier for scratchers like me to get as many views as beginners who have their projects featured.

Your suggestion has been accepted. We dropped the 1-week requirement and increased the maximum love count from 40 to 100. The original limits date back to when the site was much smaller than it is today. It makes sense to change things up to reflect how things are now. Thanks for your suggestion